arXiv subjects

Kazuma Yamasaki

Publications and source records attributed to Kazuma Yamasaki.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

How Do Developers Use Migration Guides? A Case Study of Log4j

Migration guides are a form of software documentation that helps developers address breaking changes introduced in library version updates. Prior studies have examined documents such as release notes, API reference manuals, and patch notes. However, research that focuses specifically on migration guides remains limited. Improving the usability and coverage of migration guides is essential for helping developers resolve breaking changes efficiently. Yet, we still lack a clear understanding of how migration guides are currently provided and how developers use them in practice. To fill this gap, we first investigate whether libraries known to introduce incompatibilities provide migration guides. We then conduct a detailed case study on Log4j, a library that has experienced large-scale breaking updates in the past. We empirically analyze how developers refer to and use the official migration guide in real-world projects. We find that pull request authors most frequently reference the migration guide in the pull request description, and that most references (82.81%) link to the entire guide rather than specific sections. We also find that developers use migration guides not only during major version updates but also during subsequent maintenance tasks, suggesting that the guides serve as a resource throughout the entire migration process.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

How AI Coding Agents Communicate: A Study of Pull Request Description Characteristics and Human Review Responses

The rapid adoption of large language models has led to the emergence of AI coding agents that autonomously create pull requests on GitHub. However, how these agents differ in their pull request description characteristics, and how human reviewers respond to them, remains underexplored. In this study, we conduct an empirical analysis of pull requests created by five AI coding agents using the AIDev dataset. We analyze agent differences in pull request description characteristics, including structural features, and examine human reviewer response in terms of review activity, response timing, sentiment, and merge outcomes. We find that AI coding agents exhibit distinct PR description styles, which are associated with differences in reviewer engagement, response time, and merge outcomes. We observe notable variation across agents in both reviewer interaction metrics and merge rates. These findings highlight the role of pull request presentation and reviewer interaction dynamics in human-AI collaborative software development.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Who Writes the Docs in SE 3.0? Agent vs. Human Documentation Pull Requests

As software engineering moves toward SE3.0, AI agents are increasingly used to carry out development tasks and contribute changes to software projects. It is therefore important to understand the extent of these contributions and how human developers review and intervene, since these factors shape the risks of delegating work to AI agents. While recent studies have examined how AI agents support software development tasks (e.g., code generation, issue resolution, and PR automation), their role in documentation tasks remains underexplored-even though documentation is widely consumed and shapes how developers understand and use software. Using the AIDev, we analyze 1,997 documentation-related pull requests (PRs) authored by AI agents and human developers, where documentation PRs are those that create or modify project documentation artifacts. We find that AI agents submit substantially more documentation-related PRs than humans in the studied repositories. We further observe that agent-authored documentation edits are typically integrated with little follow-up modification from humans, raising concerns about review practices and the reliability of agent-generated documentation. Overall, while AI agents already contribute substantially to documentation workflows, our results suggest concerns for emerging challenges for documentation quality assurance and human-AI collaboration in SE3.0.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

Round Outcome Prediction in VALORANT Using Tactical Features from Video Analysis

Recently, research on predicting match outcomes in esports has been actively conducted, but much of it is based on match log data and statistical information. This research targets the FPS game VALORANT, which requires complex strategies, and aims to build a round outcome prediction model by analyzing minimap information in match footage. Specifically, based on the video recognition model TimeSformer, we attempt to improve prediction accuracy by incorporating detailed tactical features extracted from minimap information, such as character position information and other in-game events. This paper reports preliminary results showing that a model trained on a dataset augmented with such tactical event labels achieved approximately 81% prediction accuracy, especially from the middle phases of a round onward, significantly outperforming a model trained on a dataset with the minimap information itself. This suggests that leveraging tactical features from match footage is highly effective for predicting round outcomes in VALORANT.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

Mining for Lags in Updating Critical Security Threats: A Case Study of Log4j Library

The Log4j-Core vulnerability, known as Log4Shell, exposed significant challenges to dependency management in software ecosystems. When a critical vulnerability is disclosed, it is imperative that dependent packages quickly adopt patched versions to mitigate risks. However, delays in applying these updates can leave client systems exposed to exploitation. Previous research has primarily focused on NPM, but there is a need for similar analysis in other ecosystems, such as Maven. Leveraging the 2025 mining challenge dataset of Java dependencies, we identify factors influencing update lags and categorize them based on version classification (major, minor, patch release cycles). Results show that lags exist, but projects with higher release cycle rates tend to address severe security issues more swiftly. In addition, over half of vulnerability fixes are implemented through patch updates, highlighting the critical role of incremental changes in maintaining software security. Our findings confirm that these lags also appear in the Maven ecosystem, even when migrating away from severe threats.

cs.SE↗