Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Kazunori D. Yamada

Publications and source records attributed to Kazunori D. Yamada.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Procedural Content Generation via Generative Artificial Intelligence

The attempt to utilize machine learning in procedural content generation (PCG) has been made in the past. In this survey paper, we investigate how generative artificial intelligence (AI), which saw a significant increase in interest in the mid-2010s, is being used for PCG. We review applications of generative AI for the creation of various types of content, including terrains, items, and even storylines. While generative AI is effective for PCG, building high-performance models requires not only handling customized content and ensuring quality and diversity, but also securing sufficient training data. For PCG research to advance further, addressing these challenges is essential. Thus, we also give special consideration to research that explores innovative generation techniques, model architectures, and approaches suited for limited-data scenarios.

cs.AI↗

Same Brain, Different Prediction: How Preprocessing Choices Undermine EEG Decoding Reliability

Electroencephalography (EEG) is a cornerstone of brain-computer interfaces and clinical neuroscience, yet deep learning models are typically trained and evaluated under a single, unreported preprocessing pipeline. We formalize preprocessing choices as a counterfactual intervention space and show that EEG predictions are surprisingly unstable under this space: across six datasets spanning four paradigms, up to 42% of trial-level predictions flip when only the preprocessing changes, a variability that standard uncertainty methods do not explicitly quantify because they condition on a fixed preprocessing pipeline. We provide three tools to make this instability measurable, decomposable, and reducible. First, a Walsh-Hadamard decomposition of the 2^7 pipeline space reveals that sensitivity is near-additive in practice under the binary intervention design, enabling efficient step-by-step optimization. Second, we introduce Preprocessing Uncertainty (PU), a per-trial diagnostic that captures a dimension of instability complementary to model-based confidence. Third, we study Normalized Adaptive PGI (NA-PGI), a graph-structured regularizer that exploits the compositional structure of preprocessing interventions as one mitigation strategy with clear scope conditions.

cs.LG↗