SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Kefei Zhang

Publications and source records attributed to Kefei Zhang.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

ScaleResfusion: Residual Rectified Flow based on Residual Vector Field

Real-world Image Restoration (Real-IR) aims to recover high-quality (HQ) images from complex and unknown degradations. Recent diffusion-based methods have substantially improved perceptual quality, yet two obstacles remain: methods that sample from Gaussian noise require many steps and are often less faithful to the degraded input, whereas residual-based methods that start from the low-quality (LQ) image typically train task-specific models from scratch, with optimization objectives coupled to a particular noise scheduler, and therefore cannot reuse modern pre-trained generative priors. We present \textbf{ScaleResfusion}, which rewrites residual restoration as a scheduler-independent adaptation interface for pre-trained text-to-image rectified-flow models. Its core, \textbf{Residual Rectified Flow} (RRF), inserts the residual term $R$ into the linear transport path of Rectified Flow, so that sampling starts from noisy LQ at an exact acceleration point, where the signal-to-noise ratio of the starting state is continuously controlled by the residual ratio $\gamma$. The resulting optimization target, the \textbf{residual vector field}, contains no scheduler-specific coefficients and differs from the pre-trained rectified-flow target only by the residual offset $\gamma R$; adapting a frozen billion-scale backbone therefore reduces to fitting this compact residual correction with LoRA-only training. A knowledge-distillation pipeline built around RRF further reduces sampling to as few as 4 steps. Experiments on real-world super-resolution across multiple benchmarks show that ScaleResfusion achieves state-of-the-art restoration quality and transfers consistently across pre-trained rectified-flow backbones from 2B to 9B parameters.

cs.CV

Forecasting of the Thermosphere via Assimilation of Electron Density and Temperature Data

The paper presents experiments of driving a physics-based thermosphere model by assimilating electron density (Ne) and temperature (Tn) data using the ensemble adjustment Kalman filter (EAKF) technique. This study not only helps to gauge the accuracy of the assimilation, to explain the inherent model bias, and to understand the limitations of the framework, but it also establishes EAKF as a viable technique in the presence of realistic data assimilation scenarios to forecast the highly dynamical thermosphere. The results from perfect model scenarios show that data assimilation changes and, more often than not, improves the model state. Data from Swarm-A, Swarm-C, CHAMP, and GRACE-A are used to validate the resulting analysis states. The independent validation results show that the Ne-guided thermosphere state does not outperform the model state without data assimilation along the considered orbits. This may be due to the limited number of bonafide Ne profiles available for the thermosphere specification tasks in the experiments. More importantly, the results show that the Ne-guided thermosphere state does not deteriorate much in performance during geomagnetic storm time. The results reveal a few challenges of using Ne profiles in a hypothetical operational data assimilation exercise. The experiment with assimilating Tn shows more promise over Ne in terms of estimating mass density along the orbits of both CHAMP and GRACE-A satellites. The results show that the improvement gained in the overall forecasted thermosphere state is better during solar minimum compared to that of solar maximum. These results also provide insights into the biases inherent in the physics-based model. The systematic biases that the paper highlight could be an indication that the specification of plasma-neutral interactions in the model needs further adjustments.

physics.space-ph

The First Comparison Between Swarm-C Accelerometer-Derived Thermospheric Densities and Physical and Empirical Model Estimates

The first systematic comparison between Swarm-C accelerometer-derived thermospheric density and both empirical and physics-based model results using multiple model performance metrics is presented. This comparison is performed at the satellite's high temporal 10-s resolution, which provides a meaningful evaluation of the models' fidelity for orbit prediction and other space weather forecasting applications. The comparison against the physical model is influenced by the specification of the lower atmospheric forcing, the high-latitude ionospheric plasma convection, and solar activity. Some insights into the model response to thermosphere-driving mechanisms are obtained through a machine learning exercise. The results of this analysis show that the short-timescale variations observed by Swarm-C during periods of high solar and geomagnetic activity were better captured by the physics-based model than the empirical models. It is concluded that Swarm-C data agree well with the climatologies inherent within the models and are, therefore, a useful data set for further model validation and scientific research.

physics.ao-ph