SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Keir Lockridge

Publications and source records attributed to Keir Lockridge.

15 recordsLinked to original sources

Half of finite abelian groups are unit groups

A group is called realizable if it is the group of units in a ring with identity. The classification of realizable groups is a difficult open problem -- originally posed by L\'aszl\'o Fuchs -- and is an active area of research. Realizable groups seem rare, but their proportion within a fixed class of groups (cyclic, dihedral, finite abelian, etc.) varies. To quantify this proportion, we introduce the realizable density of a class of finite groups as an analog of natural density for subsets of the natural numbers. The realizable finite cyclic groups and the realizable finite abelian $p$-groups for $p$ odd have been classified; we prove that their realizable densities are 1/4 and 0, respectively. The realizable finite abelian 2-groups -- and more generally the realizable finite abelian groups -- have not been fully classified, and these special cases appear quite difficult. Nonetheless, we prove that the realizable density of finite abelian 2-groups is 1 and the realizable density of finite abelian groups is 1/2. Our work combines existing classification theorems for realizable groups with tools from analytic number theory.

math.GR

Fuchs' problem for endomorphisms of nonabelian groups

In 1960, L\'{a}szl\'{o} Fuchs posed the problem of determining which groups $G$ are realizable as the group of units in some ring $R$. In \cite{chebolu2022fuchs}, we investigated the following variant of Fuchs' problem, for abelian groups: which groups $G$ are realized by a ring $R$ where every group endomorphism of $G$ is induced by a ring endomorphism of $R$? Such groups are called fully realizable. In this paper, we answer the aforementioned question for several families of nonabelian groups: symmetric, dihedral, quaternion, alternating, and simple groups; almost cyclic $p$-groups; and groups whose Sylow $2$-subgroup is either cyclic or normal and abelian. We construct three infinite families of fully realizable nonabelian groups using iterated semidirect products.

math.GR

Fuchs' problem for linear groups

Which groups can occur as the group of units in a ring? Such groups are called realizable. Though the realizable members of several classes of groups have been determined (e.g., cyclic, odd order, alternating, symmetric, finite simple, indecomposable abelian, and dihedral), the question remains open. The general linear groups are realizable by definition: they are the units in the corresponding matrix rings. In this paper, we study the realizability of two closely related linear groups, the special linear groups and the affine general linear groups. We determine which special linear groups of degree 2 over a finite field are realizable by a finite ring, and we determine which affine general linear groups of degree 1 over a cyclic group are realizable by a finite ring. We also give partial results for certain linear groups of other degrees and for rings of characteristic zero.

math.GR

Fuchs' problem for endomorphisms of abelian groups

L\'{a}szl\'{o} Fuchs posed the following question: which abelian groups arise as the group of units in a ring? In this paper, we investigate a related question: for such realizable groups $G$, when is there a ring $R$ with unit group $G$ such that every group endomorphism of $G$ is induced by a ring endomorphism of $R$? We answer this question for four common classes of groups: torsion-free abelian groups, groups of odd order, torsion abelian groups, and finitely generated abelian groups.

math.AC

Is there an infinite field whose multiplicative group is indecomposable?

In an earlier paper, we determined the finite fields with indecomposable multiplicative groups and conjectured that there is no infinite field whose multiplicative group is indecomposable. In this paper, we prove this conjecture for several popular classes of fields, including finitely generated fields, discrete valued fields, fields of Hahn series, local fields, global fields, and function fields.

math.NT

Gaussian Binomial Coefficients in Group Theory, Field Theory, and Topology

In this article, we offer group-theoretic, field-theoretic, and topological interpretations of the Gaussian binomial coefficients and their sum. For a finite $p$-group $G$ of rank $n$, we show that the Gaussian binomial coefficient $\binom{n}{k}_p$ is the number of subgroups of $G$ that are minimally expressible as an intersection of $n - k$ maximal subgroups of $G$, and their sum is precisely the number of subgroups that are either $G$ or an intersection of maximal subgroups of $G$. We provide a field-theoretic interpretation of these quantities through the lens of Galois theory and a topological interpretation involving covering spaces

math.GR

Fuchs' problem for $p$-groups

Which groups can be the group of units in a ring? This open question, posed by L\'{a}szl\'{o} Fuchs in 1960, has been studied by the authors and others with a variety of restrictions on either the class of groups or the class of rings under consideration. In the present work, we investigate Fuchs' problem for the class of $p$-groups. Ditor provided a solution in the finite, odd-primary case in 1970. Our first main result is that a finite $2$-group $G$ is the group of units of a ring of odd characteristic if and only if $G$ is of the form $C_8^t \times \prod_{i = 1}^k C_{2^{n_i}}^{s_i},$ where $t$ and $s_i$ are non-negative integers and $2^{n_i}+1$ is a Fermat prime for all $i$. We also determine the finite abelian $2$-groups of rank at most 2 that are realizable over the class of rings of characteristic 2, and we give some results concerning the realizability of $2$-groups in characteristic 0 and $2^n$. Finally, we show that the only almost cyclic $2$-groups which appear as the group of units in a ring are $C_2, C_4, C_8, C_{q-1}$ ($q$ a Fermat prime), $C_2 \times C_{2^n} (n \ge 1)$, $D_8$, and $Q_8$. From this list we obtain the $p$-groups with periodic cohomology which arise as the group of units in a ring.

math.RA

How many units can a commutative ring have?

Laszlo Fuchs posed the following problem in 1960, which remains open: classify the abelian groups occurring as the group of all units in a commutative ring. In this note, we provide an elementary solution to a simpler, related problem: find all cardinal numbers occurring as the cardinality of the group of all units in a commutative ring. As a by-product, we obtain a solution to Fuchs' problem for the class of finite abelian $p$-groups when $p$ is an odd prime.

math.AC

Fuchs' problem for dihedral groups

More than 50 years ago, Laszlo Fuchs asked which abelian groups can be the group of units of a ring. Though progress has been made, the question remains open. One could equally well pose the question for various classes of nonabelian groups. In this paper, we prove that D_2, D_4, D_6, D_8, and D_12 are the only dihedral groups that appear as the group of units of a ring of positive characteristic (or, equivalently, of a finite ring), and D_2 and D_4k, where k is odd, are the only dihedral groups that appear as the group of units of a ring of characteristic 0.

math.RA

Characterizations of Mersenne and 2-rooted primes

We give several characterizations of Mersenne primes (Theorem 1.1) and of primes for which 2 is a primitive root (Theorem 1.2). These characterizations involve group algebras, circulant matrices, binomial coefficients, and bipartite graphs.

math.NT

Fuchs' problem for indecomposable abelian groups

More than 50 years ago, Laszlo Fuchs asked which abelian groups can be the group of units of a commutative ring. Though progress has been made, the question remains open. We provide an answer to this question in the case of indecomposable abelian groups by classifying the indecomposable abelian groups that are realizable as the group of units of a ring of any given characteristic.

math.AC

When is the multiplicative group of a field indecomposable?

The multiplicative group of a finite field is well known to be cyclic; in this note, we determine the finite fields whose multiplicative groups are direct sum indecomposable. We obtain our classification using a direct argument and also as a corollary to Catalan's Conjecture. Turning to infinite fields, we prove that any infinite field whose characteristic is not equal to 2 must have a decomposable multiplicative group. We conjecture that this is also true for infinite fields of characteristic 2 and we narrow the class of possible counter-examples. Finally, using the classification of finite commutative primary rings with cyclic multiplicative groups, we determine all finite commutative rings with indecomposable multiplicative groups.

math.NT

Homological dimensions of ring spectra

We define homological dimensions for S-algebras, the generalized rings that arise in algebraic topology. We compute the homological dimensions of a number of examples, and establish some basic properties. The most difficult computation is the global dimension of real K-theory KO and its connective version ko at the prime 2. We show that the global dimension of KO is 1, 2, or 3, and the global dimension of ko is 4 or 5.

math.AT

The ghost and weak dimensions of rings and ring spectra

The primary object of this paper is to prove the conjecture of the authors from a previous paper, explaining how to recover the weak dimension of a ring from its derived category. In the process, we develop a theory of weak dimension, which we call ghost dimension, for the generalized rings, known as ring spectra, that arise in algebraic topology.

math.AT

The generating hypothesis in the derived category of a ring

We show that a strong form (the fully faithful version) of the generating hypothesis, introduced by Freyd in algebraic topology, holds in the derived category of a ring R if and only if R is von Neumann regular. This extends results of the second author. We also characterize rings for which the original form (the faithful version) of the generating hypothesis holds in the derived category of R. These must be close to von Neumann regular in a precise sense, and, given any of a number of finiteness hypotheses, must be von Neumann regular. However, we construct an example of such a ring that is not von Neumann regular, and therefore does not satisfy the strong form of the generating hypothesis.

math.AT