SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Keith Driscoll

Publications and source records attributed to Keith Driscoll.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Extremal Chowla sets and their linear analogues: A human-AI mathematical investigation using Co-Scientist

We introduce an extremal invariant associated with Chowla-type order conditions in finite groups. A nonempty subset $S$ of a finite group $G$ is called a Chowla set if every element of $S$ has order greater than $|S|$, and we write $C(G)$ for the maximum cardinality of such a set. We first show that $C(G)$ is determined by the distribution of element orders in $G$. For cyclic groups, we derive an exact divisor formula and characterize the integers $n$ for which $C(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})=\varphi(n)$. We prove that $\liminf_{n\to\infty}C(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})/\varphi(n)=1$, whereas $\limsup_{n\to\infty}C(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})/\varphi(n)=\infty$, and we determine the corresponding lower and upper limits under normalization by $n$. For finite abelian groups, we obtain an explicit formula in terms of the invariant-factor decomposition, together with a closed formula for finite abelian $p$-groups. We then develop a linear analogue for finite field extensions. A nonzero $K$-subspace $A$ of an extension $L/K$ is called a Chowla subspace if $[K(a):K]>\dim_K A$ for every nonzero $a\in A$. Since this condition depends on $\dim_K A$, it does not generally require every nonzero element of $A$ to generate $L$ over $K$. Nevertheless, when $L/K$ is finite and separable, we prove the exact formula $C(L/K)=[L:K]-d_{\max}(L/K)$, where $d_{\max}(L/K)$ is the largest degree over $K$ of a proper intermediate field. For finite fields, we give a direct proof in every degree using a normal-basis construction. This work was developed through an expert-guided human-AI collaboration. A reasoning-focused configuration of Co-Scientist was used to explore examples and potential proof strategies. The authors formulated the problem, independently verified and completed all arguments, and wrote the final proofs.

math.NT

Data Analysis Methods Preliminaries for a Photon-based Hardware Random Number Generator

High quality random numbers are necessary in the modern world. Ranging from encryption keys in cyber security to models and simulations for scientific use: it's important that these random numbers are of high quality and quickly attainable. One common solution to the generation of random numbers is that of pseudo-random number generators, or PRNGs. PRNGs generate random numbers by first quantifying some unpredictable phenomena into a number or string and feeding it into an algorithm which yields numbers randomly based on that seed. Easy places to find seeds include the user's mouse movements or the machine's uptime. These are only pseudorandom, however, as if given the same seed twice, the PRNG would generate the same 'random' output. This is great for games like Minecraft, but not so great for cybersecurity encryption key generation. By using a hardware random number generator (HRNG), random numbers that are not susceptible to the flaws found in PRNGs can be attained at a high rate.

cs.CR

Grundy domination of forests and the strong product conjecture

A maximum sequence $S$ of vertices in a graph $G$, so that every vertex in $S$ has a neighbor which is independent, or is itself independent, from all previous vertices in $S$, is called a Grundy dominating sequence. The Grundy domination number, $γ_{gr}(G)$, is the length of $S$. We show that for any forest $F$, $γ_{gr}(F)=|V(T)|-|\mathcal{P}|$ where $\mathcal{P}$ is a minimum partition of the non-isolate vertices of $F$ into caterpillars in which if two caterpillars of $\mathcal{P}$ have an edge between them in $F$, then such an edge must be incident to a non-leaf vertex in at least one of the caterpillars. We use this result to show the strong product conjecture of B. Brešar, Cs. Bujtás, T. Gologranc, S. Klavžar, G. Košmrlj, B. Patkós, Zs. Tuza, and M. Vizer, Dominating sequences in grid-like and toroidal graphs, Electron. J. Combin. 23(4): P4.34 (2016), for all forests. Namely, we show that for any forest $G$ and graph $H$, $γ_{gr}(G \boxtimes H) = γ_{gr}(G) γ_{gr}(H)$. We also show that every connected graph $G$ has a spanning tree $T$ so that $γ_{gr}(G)\le γ_{gr}(T)$ and that every non-complete connected graph contains a Grundy dominating set $S$ so that the induced subgraph of $S$ contains no isolated vertices.

math.CO

All Trees are Seven-Cordial

For any integer $k>0$, a tree $T$ is $k$-cordial if there exists a labeling of the vertices of $T$ by $\mathbb{Z}_k$, inducing edge-weights as the sum modulo $k$ of the labels on incident vertices to a given edge, which furthermore satisfies the following conditions: (i) Each label appears on at most one more vertex than any other label. (ii) Each edge-weight appears on at most one more edge than any other edge-weight. Mark Hovey (1991) conjectured that all trees are $k$-cordial for any integer $k$. Cahit (1987) had shown earlier that all trees are $2$-cordial and Hovey proved that all trees are $3,4,$ and $5$-cordial. Driscoll, et. al. (2017), used an adjustment to Hovey's test to show that all trees are $6$-cordial. It is shown here that all trees are $7$-cordial by that same adjustment.

math.CO

All trees are six-cordial

For any integer $k>0$, a tree $T$ is $k$-cordial if there exists a labeling of the vertices of $T$ by $\mathbb{Z}_k$, inducing a labeling on the edges with edge-weights found by summing the labels on vertices incident to a given edge modulo $k$ so that each label appears on at most one more vertex than any other and each edge-weight appears on at most one more edge than any other. We prove that all trees are six-cordial by an adjustment of the test proposed by Hovey (1991) to show all trees are $k$-cordial.

math.CO