arXiv subjects

Kevin Schewior

Publications and source records attributed to Kevin Schewior.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Threshold Dynamics and Correlated Prophet Inequalities

Prophet inequalities have become a central tool for analyzing the performance of online algorithms. However, most existing results assume that input random variables are independent, which limits their applicability. Motivated by this gap, we study prophet inequalities under two correlation models induced by a latent state of the world variable $Z$. In the common-base model, the algorithm observes the sequence $Z+X_1,\dots,Z+X_n$. We analyze single-threshold algorithms with the constraint that they always accept the final item, guaranteeing a reward of at least $Z$. When $Z$ is chosen adversarially, we characterize the optimal deterministic algorithm of this form, achieving a competitive ratio of $0.381$. We then show that randomizing improves the guarantee to $0.4$. By a minimax argument, the same ratio is achievable when $Z$ is random. We depart from standard techniques by establishing a stronger lower bound of $0.41$ and an upper bound of $0.475$, ruling out the possibility that this class of algorithms attains the $1/2$ ratio known for independent inputs. The core technical contribution is a new analytical framework that captures the reward dynamics of single-threshold algorithms. We introduce a differential equation characterizing the expected reward of a threshold in the worst-case instance, parameterized by the distribution of the maximum. This equation admits a closed-form and unifies known single-threshold prophet inequalities, yielding a simple threshold-optimality condition applicable to the common-base model. Finally, we study the common-scale model, where inputs take the form $Z\cdot X_1,\dots,Z\cdot X_n$. We show that this minimal multiplicative correlation yields strong impossibility results: no algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio exceeding $1/n$.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Forwarding Packets Greedily on the Line

We consider the problem of forwarding packets arriving online with their destinations in a line network. In each time step, each router can forward one packet along the edge to its right, and the packet arrives at the next router one time step later. Packets are forwarded until they reach their destination. The flow time of a packet is the elapsed time between its release and its arrival at its destination. The goal is to minimize the maximum flow time. This problem was introduced by Antoniadis et al. in 2014, with a focus on line networks. They proposed several natural algorithms. For one, they proved that it is not $O(1)$-competitive; for others, they claimed analogous lower bounds, seemingly leaving no natural candidate for an $O(1)$-competitive algorithm. In this paper, we study a natural algorithm not considered in that work. Our algorithm, simply called Greedy, selects packets according to their projected flow time under the assumption that they are not delayed any further. We focus on the special case in which each packet needs to be forwarded by one or two routers; this case captures core difficulties. We show that Greedy achieves a competitive ratio of exactly $2-2^{1-k}$, where $k$ is the number of active routers in the network. We also give the first nontrivial general lower bound, which applies even to randomized algorithms: using the same type of instances as in our lower bound for Greedy, we show that no algorithm can be $(4/3-\varepsilon)$-competitive for any $\varepsilon>0$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Combinatorial Perpetual Scheduling: Existence and Computation of Low-Height Schedules

This paper considers a framework for combinatorial variants of perpetual-scheduling problems. Given an independence system $(E,\mathcal{I})$, a schedule consists of an independent set $I_t \in \mathcal{I}$ for every time step $t \in \mathbb{N}$, with the objective of fulfilling frequency requirements on the occurrence of elements in $E$. We focus specifically on combinatorial bamboo garden trimming, where elements accumulate height at growth rates $g(e)$ for $e \in E$ and are reset to zero when scheduled, with the goal of minimizing the maximum height attained by any element. We assume that $g$ is normalized so that it is a convex combination of the incidence vectors of $\mathcal{I}$. Using the integrality of the matroid-intersection polytope, we prove that, when $(E,\mathcal{I})$ is a matroid, it is possible to guarantee a maximum height of at most 2, which is optimal. We complement this existential result with efficient algorithms for specific matroid classes, achieving a maximum height of 2 for uniform and partition matroids, and 4 for graphic and laminar matroids. In contrast, we show that for general independence systems, the optimal guaranteed height is $\Theta(\log |E|)$ and can be achieved by an efficient algorithm. For combinatorial pinwheel scheduling, where each element $e\in E$ needs to occur in the schedule at least every $a_e \in \mathbb{N}$ time steps, our results imply bounds on the density sufficient for schedulability.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Approximating Matroid Basis Testing for Partition Matroids using Budget-In-Expectation

We consider the following Stochastic Boolean Function Evaluation problem, which is closely related to several problems from the literature. A matroid $\mathcal{M}$ (in compact representation) on ground set $E$ is given, and each element $i\in E$ is active independently with known probability $p_i\in(0,1)$. The elements can be queried, upon which it is revealed whether the respective element is active or not. The goal is to find an adaptive querying strategy for determining whether there is a basis of $\mathcal{M}$ in which all elements are active, with the objective of minimizing the expected number of queries. When $\mathcal{M}$ is a uniform matroid, this is the problem of evaluating a $k$-of-$n$ function, first studied in the 1970s. This problem is well-understood, and has an optimal adaptive strategy that can be computed in polynomial time. Taking $\mathcal{M}$ to instead be a partition matroid, we show that previous approaches fail to give a constant-factor approximation. Our main result is a polynomial-time constant-factor approximation algorithm producing a randomized strategy for this partition matroid problem. We obtain this result by combining a new technique with several well-established techniques. Our algorithm adaptively interleaves solutions to several instances of a novel type of stochastic querying problem, with a constraint on the $\textit{expected}$ cost. We believe that this type of problem is of independent interest, will spark follow-up work, and has the potential for additional applications.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Non-Adaptive Evaluation of $k$-of-$n$ Functions: Tight Gap and a Unit-Cost PTAS

We consider the Stochastic Boolean Function Evaluation (SBFE) problem in the well-studied case of $k$-of-$n$ functions: There are independent Boolean random variables $x_1,\dots,x_n$ where each variable $i$ has a known probability $p_i$ of taking value $1$, and a known cost $c_i$ that can be paid to find out its value. The value of the function is $1$ iff there are at least $k$ $1$s among the variables. The goal is to efficiently compute a strategy that, at minimum expected cost, tests the variables until the function value is determined. While an elegant polynomial-time exact algorithm is known when tests can be made adaptively, we focus on the non-adaptive variant, for which much less is known. First, we show a clean and tight lower bound of $2$ on the adaptivity gap, i.e., the worst-case multiplicative loss in the objective function caused by disallowing adaptivity, of the problem. This improves the tight lower bound of $3/2$ for the unit-cost variant. Second, we give a PTAS for computing the best non-adaptive strategy in the unit-cost case, the first PTAS for an SBFE problem. At the core, our scheme establishes a novel notion of two-sided dominance (w.r.t. the optimal solution) by guessing so-called milestone tests for a set of carefully chosen buckets of tests. To turn this technique into a polynomial-time algorithm, we use a decomposition approach paired with a random-shift argument. In fact, our PTAS extends to the class of arbitrary symmetric Boolean functions, which are Boolean functions whose value only depends on the number of $1$s among the input variables.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Stochastic scheduling with Bernoulli-type jobs through policy stratification

This paper addresses the problem of computing a scheduling policy that minimizes the total expected completion time of a set of $N$ jobs with stochastic processing times on $m$ parallel identical machines. When all processing times follow Bernoulli-type distributions, Gupta et al. (SODA '23) exhibited approximation algorithms with an approximation guarantee $\tilde{\text{O}}(\sqrt{m})$, where $m$ is the number of machines and $\tilde{\text{O}}(\cdot)$ suppresses polylogarithmic factors in $N$, improving upon an earlier ${\text{O}}(m)$ approximation by Eberle et al. (OR Letters '19) for a special case. The present paper shows that, quite unexpectedly, the problem with Bernoulli-type jobs admits a PTAS whenever the number of different job-size parameters is bounded by a constant. The result is based on a series of transformations of an optimal scheduling policy to a "stratified" policy that makes scheduling decisions at specific points in time only, while losing only a negligible factor in expected cost. An optimal stratified policy is computed using dynamic programming. Two technical issues are solved, namely (i) to ensure that, with at most a slight delay, the stratified policy has an information advantage over the optimal policy, allowing it to simulate its decisions, and (ii) to ensure that the delays do not accumulate, thus solving the trade-off between the complexity of the scheduling policy and its expected cost. Our results also imply a quasi-polynomial $\text{O}(\log N)$-approximation for the case with an arbitrary number of job sizes.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Scheduling on a Stochastic Number of Machines

We consider a new scheduling problem on parallel identical machines in which the number of machines is initially not known, but it follows a given probability distribution. Only after all jobs are assigned to a given number of bags, the actual number of machines is revealed. Subsequently, the jobs need to be assigned to the machines without splitting the bags. This is the stochastic version of a related problem introduced by Stein and Zhong [SODA 2018, TALG 2020] and it is, for example, motivated by bundling jobs that need to be scheduled by data centers. We present two PTASs for the stochastic setting, computing job-to-bag assignments that (i) minimize the expected maximum machine load and (ii) maximize the expected minimum machine load (like in the Santa Claus problem), respectively. The former result follows by careful enumeration combined with known PTASs. For the latter result, we introduce an intricate dynamic program that we apply to a suitably rounded instance.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Designing Exploration Contracts

We study a natural application of contract design in the context of sequential exploration problems. In our principal-agent setting, a search task is delegated to an agent. The agent performs a sequential exploration of $n$ boxes, suffers the exploration cost for each inspected box, and selects the content (called the prize) of one inspected box as outcome. Agent and principal obtain an individual value based on the selected prize. To influence the search, the principal a-priori designs a contract with a non-negative payment to the agent for each potential prize. The goal of the principal is to maximize her expected reward, i.e., value minus payment. Interestingly, this natural contract scenario shares close relations with the Pandora's Box problem. We show how to compute optimal contracts for the principal in several scenarios. A popular and important subclass is that of linear contracts, and we show how to compute optimal linear contracts in polynomial time. For general contracts, we obtain optimal contracts under the standard assumption that the agent suffers cost but obtains value only from the transfers by the principal. More generally, for general contracts with non-zero agent values for outcomes we show how to compute an optimal contract in two cases: (1) when each box has only one prize with non-zero value for principal and agent, (2) for i.i.d. boxes with a single prize with positive value for the principal.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Quickly Determining Who Won an Election

This paper considers elections in which voters choose one candidate each, independently according to known probability distributions. A candidate receiving a strict majority (absolute or relative, depending on the version) wins. After the voters have made their choices, each vote can be inspected to determine which candidate received that vote. The time (or cost) to inspect each of the votes is known in advance. The task is to (possibly adaptively) determine the order in which to inspect the votes, so as to minimize the expected time to determine which candidate has won the election. We design polynomial-time constant-factor approximation algorithms for both the absolute-majority and the relative-majority version. Both algorithms are based on a two-phase approach. In the first phase, the algorithms reduce the number of relevant candidates to $O(1)$, and in the second phase they utilize techniques from the literature on stochastic function evaluation to handle the remaining candidates. In the case of absolute majority, we show that the same can be achieved with only two rounds of adaptivity.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Clustering Graphs of Bounded Treewidth to Minimize the Sum of Radius-Dependent Costs

We consider the following natural problem that generalizes min-sum-radii clustering: Given is $k\in\mathbb{N}$ as well as some metric space $(V,d)$ where $V=F\cup C$ for facilities $F$ and clients $C$. The goal is to find a clustering given by $k$ facility-radius pairs $(f_1,r_1),\dots,(f_k,r_k)\in F\times\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$ such that $C\subseteq B(f_1,r_1)\cup\dots\cup B(f_k,r_k)$ and $\sum_{i=1,\dots,k} g(r_i)$ is minimized for some increasing function $g:\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$. Here, $B(x,r)$ is the radius-$r$ ball centered at $x$. For the case that $(V,d)$ is the shortest-path metric of some edge-weighted graph of bounded treewidth, we present a dynamic program that is tailored to this class of problems and achieves a polynomial running time, establishing that the problem is in $\mathsf{XP}$ with parameter treewidth.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Threshold Testing and Semi-Online Prophet Inequalities

We study threshold testing, an elementary probing model with the goal to choose a large value out of $n$ i.i.d. random variables. An algorithm can test each variable $X_i$ once for some threshold $t_i$, and the test returns binary feedback whether $X_i \ge t_i$ or not. Thresholds can be chosen adaptively or non-adaptively by the algorithm. Given the results for the tests of each variable, we then select the variable with highest conditional expectation. We compare the expected value obtained by the testing algorithm with expected maximum of the variables. Threshold testing is a semi-online variant of the gambler's problem and prophet inequalities. Indeed, the optimal performance of non-adaptive algorithms for threshold testing is governed by the standard i.i.d. prophet inequality of approximately $0.745+o(1)$ as $n \to \infty$. We show how adaptive algorithms can significantly improve upon this ratio. Our adaptive testing strategy guarantees a competitive ratio of at least $0.869-o(1)$. Moreover, we show that there are distributions that admit only a constant ratio $c < 1$, even when $n \to \infty$. Finally, when each box can be tested multiple times (with $n$ tests in total), we design an algorithm that achieves a ratio of $1-o(1)$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Trading Prophets

In this work we initiate the study of buy-and-sell prophet inequalities. We start by considering what is arguably the most fundamental setting. In this setting the online algorithm observes a sequence of prices one after the other. At each time step, the online algorithm can decide to buy and pay the current price if it does not hold the item already; or it can decide to sell and collect the current price as a reward if it holds the item. We show that for i.i.d. prices a single-threshold online algorithm achieves at least $1/2$ of the expected profit of the optimal offline algorithm and we prove that this is optimal. For non-i.i.d. prices in random order, where prices are no longer independent, we give a single-threshold online algorithm that achieves at least a $1/16$ fraction of the expected profit of the optimal offline algorithm. We also show that for this setting no online algorithm can yield a better than $1/3$ approximation, and thus establish a formal separation from the i.i.d. case. On the other hand, we present a threshold-based online algorithm for this setting that yields a $1/2-o(1)$ approximation. For non-i.i.d. prices no approximation is possible. We use the results for these base cases to solve a variety of more complex settings. For instance, we show a $1/2-o(1)$ approximation for settings where prices are affiliated and the online algorithm has only access to a single sample. We also extend our upper and lower bounds for the single item case to $k$ items, and thus in particular show that it is impossible to achieve $1-o(1)$ approximations. For the budgeted version, where fractions of an item can be bought, and gains can be reinvested, we show a constant-factor approximation to the optimal offline algorithm's growth rate. In a setting with $k$ item types and price streams, we achieve a $\Omega(1/k)$ approximation for the unit-capacity case, which is optimal.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Incremental Maximization via Continuization

We consider the problem of finding an incremental solution to a cardinality-constrained maximization problem that not only captures the solution for a fixed cardinality, but also describes how to gradually grow the solution as the cardinality bound increases. The goal is to find an incremental solution that guarantees a good competitive ratio against the optimum solution for all cardinalities simultaneously. The central challenge is to characterize maximization problems where this is possible, and to determine the best-possible competitive ratio that can be attained. A lower bound of $2.18$ and an upper bound of $\varphi + 1 \approx 2.618$ are known on the competitive ratio for monotone and accountable objectives [Bernstein et al., Math. Prog., 2022], which capture a wide range of maximization problems. We introduce a continuization technique and identify an optimal incremental algorithm that provides strong evidence that $\varphi + 1$ is the best-possible competitive ratio. Using this continuization, we obtain an improved lower bound of $2.246$ by studying a particular recurrence relation whose characteristic polynomial has complex roots exactly beyond the lower bound. Based on the optimal continuous algorithm combined with a scaling approach, we also provide a $1.772$-competitive randomized algorithm. We complement this by a randomized lower bound of $1.447$ via Yao's principle.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Improved Approximation Algorithms for the Expanding Search Problem

A searcher is tasked with exploring a graph with edge lengths and vertex weights, starting from a designated vertex. Initially, only the starting vertex is considered explored. At each step, the searcher adds an edge to the solution, connecting an unexplored vertex to an explored one. The time required to add an edge equals its length. The objective is to minimize the weighted sum of exploration times for all vertices. We demonstrate that this problem is hard to approximate and present algorithms with improved approximation guarantees. Specifically, we provide a $(2\mathrm{e} + \varepsilon)$-approximation for any $\varepsilon > 0$ for the general case. On instances where the vertex weights are binary, we achieve a $2\mathrm{e}$-approximation. Finally, we develop a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) for Euclidean graphs. Previously, only an $8$-approximation was known for all these cases.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Simple Algorithms for Stochastic Score Classification with Small Approximation Ratios

We revisit the Stochastic Score Classification (SSC) problem introduced by Gkenosis et al. (ESA 2018): We are given $n$ tests. Each test $j$ can be conducted at cost $c_j$, and it succeeds independently with probability $p_j$. Further, a partition of the (integer) interval $\{0,\dots,n\}$ into $B$ smaller intervals is known. The goal is to conduct tests so as to determine that interval from the partition in which the number of successful tests lies while minimizing the expected cost. Ghuge et al. (IPCO 2022) recently showed that a polynomial-time constant-factor approximation algorithm exists. We show that interweaving the two strategies that order tests increasingly by their $c_j/p_j$ and $c_j/(1-p_j)$ ratios, respectively, -- as already proposed by Gkensosis et al. for a special case -- yields a small approximation ratio. We also show that the approximation ratio can be slightly decreased from $6$ to $3+2\sqrt{2}\approx 5.828$ by adding in a third strategy that simply orders tests increasingly by their costs. The similar analyses for both algorithms are nontrivial but arguably clean. Finally, we complement the implied upper bound of $3+2\sqrt{2}$ on the adaptivity gap with a lower bound of $3/2$. Since the lower-bound instance is a so-called unit-cost $k$-of-$n$ instance, we settle the adaptivity gap in this case.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Knapsack Secretary Through Boosting

We revisit the knapsack-secretary problem (Babaioff et al.; APPROX 2007), a generalization of the classic secretary problem in which items have different sizes and multiple items may be selected if their total size does not exceed the capacity $B$ of a knapsack. Previous works show competitive ratios of $1/(10e)$ (Babaioff et al.), $1/8.06$ (Kesselheim et al.; STOC 2014), and $1/6.65$ (Albers, Khan, and Ladewig; APPROX 2019) for the general problem but no definitive answers for the achievable competitive ratio; the best known impossibility remains $1/e$ as inherited from the classic secretary problem. In an effort to make more qualitative progress, we take an orthogonal approach and give definitive answers for special cases. Our main result is on the $1$-$2$-knapsack secretary problem, the special case in which $B=2$ and all items have sizes $1$ or $2$, arguably the simplest meaningful generalization of the secretary problem towards the knapsack secretary problem. Our algorithm is simple: It $\textit{boosts}$ the value of size-$1$ items by a factor $\alpha>1$ and then uses the size-oblivious approach by Albers, Khan, and Ladewig. We show by a nontrivial analysis that this algorithm achieves a competitive ratio of $1/e$ if and only if $1.40\lesssim\alpha\leq e/(e-1)\approx 1.58$. Towards understanding the general case, we then consider the case when sizes are $1$ and $B$, and $B$ is large. While it remains unclear if $1/e$ can be achieved in that case, we show that algorithms based only on the relative ranks of the item values can achieve precisely a competitive ratio of $1/(e+1)$. To show the impossibility, we use a non-trivial generalization of the factor-revealing linear program for the secretary problem (Buchbinder, Jain, and Singh; IPCO 2010).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Online Search for a Hyperplane in High-Dimensional Euclidean Space

We consider the online search problem in which a server starting at the origin of a $d$-dimensional Euclidean space has to find an arbitrary hyperplane. The best-possible competitive ratio and the length of the shortest curve from which each point on the $d$-dimensional unit sphere can be seen are within a constant factor of each other. We show that this length is in $\Omega(d)\cap O(d^{3/2})$.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2021

A Stronger Impossibility for Fully Online Matching

We revisit the fully online matching model (Huang et al., J.\ ACM, 2020), an extension of the classic online matching model due to Karp, Vazirani, and Vazirani (STOC 1990), which has recently received a lot of attention (Huang et al., SODA 2019 and FOCS 2020), partly due to applications in ride-sharing platforms. It has been shown that the fully online version is harder than the classic version for which the achievable competitive ratio is at most $0.6317$, rather than precisely $1-\frac{1}{e}\approx 0.6321$. We introduce two new ideas to the construction. By optimizing the parameters of the modified construction numerically, we obtain an improved impossibility result of $0.6297$. Like the previous bound, the new bound even holds for fractional (rather than randomized) algorithms on bipartite graphs.

cs.DS↗