Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Kirill Simonov

Publications and source records attributed to Kirill Simonov.

40 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Manipulating Districts to Win Elections: Fine-Grained Complexity

Gerrymandering is a practice of manipulating district boundaries and locations in order to achieve a political advantage for a particular party. Lewenberg, Lev, and Rosenschein [AAMAS 2017] initiated the algorithmic study of a geographically-based manipulation problem, where voters must vote at the ballot box closest to them. In this variant of gerrymandering, for a given set of possible locations of ballot boxes and known political preferences of $n$ voters, the task is to identify locations for $k$ boxes out of $m$ possible locations to guarantee victory of a certain party in at least $l$ districts. Here integers $k$ and $l$ are some selected parameter. It is known that the problem is NP-complete already for 4 political parties and prior to our work only heuristic algorithms for this problem were developed. We initiate the rigorous study of the gerrymandering problem from the perspectives of parameterized and fine-grained complexity and provide asymptotically matching lower and upper bounds on its computational complexity. We prove that the problem is W[1]-hard parameterized by $k+n$ and that it does not admit an $f(n,k)\cdot m^{o(\sqrt{k})}$ algorithm for any function $f$ of $k$ and $n$ only, unless Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. Our lower bounds hold already for $2$ parties. On the other hand, we give an algorithm that solves the problem for a constant number of parties in time $(m+n)^{O(\sqrt{k})}$.

cs.DS↗

Refined Complexity of PCA with Outliers

Principal component analysis (PCA) is one of the most fundamental procedures in exploratory data analysis and is the basic step in applications ranging from quantitative finance and bioinformatics to image analysis and neuroscience. However, it is well-documented that the applicability of PCA in many real scenarios could be constrained by an "immune deficiency" to outliers such as corrupted observations. We consider the following algorithmic question about the PCA with outliers. For a set of $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^{d}$, how to learn a subset of points, say 1% of the total number of points, such that the remaining part of the points is best fit into some unknown $r$-dimensional subspace? We provide a rigorous algorithmic analysis of the problem. We show that the problem is solvable in time $n^{O(d^2)}$. In particular, for constant dimension the problem is solvable in polynomial time. We complement the algorithmic result by the lower bound, showing that unless Exponential Time Hypothesis fails, in time $f(d)n^{o(d)}$, for any function $f$ of $d$, it is impossible not only to solve the problem exactly but even to approximate it within a constant factor.

cs.DS↗

Low-rank binary matrix approximation in column-sum norm

We consider $\ell_1$-Rank-$r$ Approximation over GF(2), where for a binary $m\times n$ matrix ${\bf A}$ and a positive integer $r$, one seeks a binary matrix ${\bf B}$ of rank at most $r$, minimizing the column-sum norm $||{\bf A} -{\bf B}||_1$. We show that for every $\varepsilon\in (0, 1)$, there is a randomized $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for $\ell_1$-Rank-$r$ Approximation over GF(2) of running time $m^{O(1)}n^{O(2^{4r}\cdot \varepsilon^{-4})}$. This is the first polynomial time approximation scheme (PTAS) for this problem.

cs.DS↗

Parameterized k-Clustering: The distance matters!

We consider the $k$-Clustering problem, which is for a given multiset of $n$ vectors $X\subset \mathbb{Z}^d$ and a nonnegative number $D$, to decide whether $X$ can be partitioned into $k$ clusters $C_1, \dots, C_k$ such that the cost \[\sum_{i=1}^k \min_{c_i\in \mathbb{R}^d}\sum_{x \in C_i} \|x-c_i\|_p^p \leq D,\] where $\|\cdot\|_p$ is the Minkowski ($L_p$) norm of order $p$. For $p=1$, $k$-Clustering is the well-known $k$-Median. For $p=2$, the case of the Euclidean distance, $k$-Clustering is $k$-Means. We show that the parameterized complexity of $k$-Clustering strongly depends on the distance order $p$. In particular, we prove that for every $p\in (0,1]$, $k$-Clustering is solvable in time $2^{O(D \log{D})} (nd)^{O(1)}$, and hence is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by $D$. On the other hand, we prove that for distances of orders $p=0$ and $p=\infty$, no such algorithm exists, unless FPT=W[1].

cs.DS↗