Kishin Sasaki | Searcharxiv

arXiv2023

On ordered sequences for link diagrams with respect to Reidemeister moves I and III

We first prove that, infinitely many pairs of trivial knot diagrams that are transformed into each other by applying Reidemeister moves I and III are NOT transformed into each other by a sequence of the Reidemeister moves I that increase the number of crossings, followed by a sequence of Reidemeister moves III, followed by a sequence of the Reidemeister moves I that decrease the number of crossings. To create a simple sequence between link diagrams that are transformed into each other by applying finitely many Reidemeister moves I and III, we prove that the link diagrams are always transformed into each other by applying an I-generalized ordered sequence.

math.GT↗

arXiv2023

On link diagrams that are minimal with respect to Reidemeister moves I and II

In this paper, a link diagram is said to be minimal if no Reidemeister move I or II can be applied to it to reduce the number of crossings. We show that for an arbitrary diagram D of a link without a trivial split component, a minimal diagram obtained by applying Reidemeister moves I and II to D is unique. The proof also shows that the number of crossings of such a minimal diagram is unique for any diagram of any link. As the unknot admits infinitely many non-trivial minimal diagrams, we see that every link has infinitely many minimal diagrams, by considering the connected sums with such diagrams. We show that for a link without a trivial split component, an arbitrary Reidemeister move III either does not change the associated minimal diagram or can be reduced to a special type of a move up to Reidemeister moves I and II.

math.GT↗