Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Konrad K. Dabrowski

Publications and source records attributed to Konrad K. Dabrowski.

39 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Editing to Eulerian Graphs

We investigate the problem of modifying a graph into a connected graph in which the degree of each vertex satisfies a prescribed parity constraint. Let $ea$, $ed$ and $vd$ denote the operations edge addition, edge deletion and vertex deletion respectively. For any $S\subseteq \{ea,ed,vd\}$, we define Connected Degree Parity Editing$(S)$ (CDPE($S$)) to be the problem that takes as input a graph $G$, an integer $k$ and a function $δ\colon V(G)\rightarrow\{0,1\}$, and asks whether $G$ can be modified into a connected graph $H$ with $d_{H}(v)\equivδ(v)~(\bmod~2)$ for each $v\in V(H)$, using at most $k$ operations from $S$. We prove that 1. if $S=\{ea\}$ or $S=\{ea,ed\}$, then CDPE($S$) can be solved in polynomial time; 2. if $\{vd\} \subseteq S\subseteq \{ea,ed,vd\}$, then CDPE($S$) is NP-complete and W[1]-hard when parameterized by $k$, even if $δ\equiv 0$. Together with known results by Cai and Yang and by Cygan, Marx, Pilipczuk, Pilipczuk and Schlotter, our results completely classify the classical and parameterized complexity of the CDPE($S$) problem for all $S\subseteq \{ea,ed,vd\}$. We obtain the same classification for a natural variant of the CDPE($S$) problem on directed graphs, where the target is a weakly connected digraph in which the difference between the in- and out-degree of every vertex equals a prescribed value. As an important implication of our results, we obtain polynomial-time algorithms for the Eulerian Editing problem and its directed variant.

cs.DM↗

Classifying the Clique-Width of $H$-Free Bipartite Graphs

Let $G$ be a bipartite graph, and let $H$ be a bipartite graph with a fixed bipartition $(B_H,W_H)$. We consider three different, natural ways of forbidding $H$ as an induced subgraph in $G$. First, $G$ is $H$-free if it does not contain $H$ as an induced subgraph. Second, $G$ is strongly $H$-free if $G$ is $H$-free or else has no bipartition $(B_G,W_G)$ with $B_H\subseteq B_G$ and $W_H\subseteq W_G$. Third, $G$ is weakly $H$-free if $G$ is $H$-free or else has at least one bipartition $(B_G,W_G)$ with $B_H\not\subseteq B_G$ or $W_H\not\subseteq W_G$. Lozin and Volz characterized all bipartite graphs $H$ for which the class of strongly $H$-free bipartite graphs has bounded clique-width. We extend their result by giving complete classifications for the other two variants of $H$-freeness.

cs.DM↗

Playing with parameters: structural parameterization in graphs

When considering a graph problem from a parameterized point of view, the parameter chosen is often the size of an optimal solution of this problem (the "standard" parameter). A natural subject for investigation is what happens when we parameterize such a problem by various other parameters, some of which may be the values of optimal solutions to different problems. Such research is known as parameterized ecology. In this paper, we investigate seven natural vertex problems, along with their respective parameters: the size of a maximum independent set, the size of a minimum vertex cover, the size of a maximum clique, the chromatic number, the size of a minimum dominating set, the size of a minimum independent dominating set and the size of a minimum feedback vertex set. We study the parameterized complexity of each of these problems with respect to the standard parameter of the others.

cs.CC↗