Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Koppány István Encz

Publications and source records attributed to Koppány István Encz.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Robust Approximation and the Arity Barrier at Width Two

Zwick's algorithm for Horn satisfiability shows that constraints of unbounded arity can admit a robust approximation guarantee independent of the arity. For finite constraint languages, Barto and Kozik proved that robust approximability is characterized by bounded width. We ask whether arity-independent robustness persists beyond width one and show that it fails already at width two. For Majority-closed Boolean linear constraints of maximum arity $k \ge 2$, we give a randomized polynomial-time algorithm that, without knowing $\varepsilon$, violates an expected $O(\sqrt{\varepsilon \log k})$ fraction of the constraint weight on $(1-\varepsilon)$-satisfiable instances. Under the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC), a matching NP-hardness lower bound of $Ω(\sqrt{\varepsilon \log k})$ holds in an explicit parameter regime. Under this assumption, the bounded-width characterization therefore does not extend uniformly to constraints of unbounded arity. The algorithm rounds a degree-eight Sum-of-Squares (SoS) relaxation with a single Gaussian threshold. Since polynomial size alone does not make SoS solvable in polynomial bit complexity, we construct complete truncated Groebner bases for the soft Majority ideal and show that, at every fixed degree $2d$, the relaxation can be optimized to any rational accuracy in polynomial time with exactly feasible solutions, and degree-$2d$ SoS proofs can be found after an additive perturbation at degree at most $4d+10$. The lower bound combines Raghavendra's gap-to-hardness theorem with an integrality gap on a Gaussian star, analyzed via the Isaksson-Mossel theorem that parallel halfspaces maximize the joint membership probability of exchangeable Gaussians.

cs.CC↗

Integrality gap preserving reductions

We propose a framework for the systematic study of integrality gaps of combinatorial optimization problems with respect to a fixed linear programming formulation. The method, called \emph{integrality gap preserving reduction}, consists of iteratively shrinking the input universe of the problem while guaranteeing that gap-maximizing instances remain selected. When the subset of remaining instances becomes specific enough, we calculate the integrality gap explicitly. Besides applying integrality gap preserving reductions to three well-known optimization problems via their standard linear programming formulations (weighted vertex cover problem, multiple knapsack problem, and unrelated machine scheduling problem), we analyse the restricted assignment problem via its configuration LP relaxation. We prove that the integrality gap is equal to $1$ for three ``easy'' subclasses of the problem that are either solvable in polynomial time or admit a PTAS (e.g., the all-one processing time case). For some remaining cases, we improve the current lower bound using our technique.

cs.DM↗

Branch-and-Bound Algorithms as Polynomial-time Approximation Schemes

Branch-and-bound algorithms (B&B) and polynomial-time approximation schemes (PTAS) are two seemingly distant areas of combinatorial optimization. We intend to (partially) bridge the gap between them while expanding the boundary of theoretical knowledge on the B\&B framework. Branch-and-bound algorithms typically guarantee that an optimal solution is eventually found. However, we show that the standard implementation of branch-and-bound for certain knapsack and scheduling problems also exhibits PTAS-like behavior, yielding increasingly better solutions within polynomial time. Our findings are supported by computational experiments and comparisons with benchmark methods. This paper is an extended version of a paper accepted at ICALP 2025

cs.DS↗