arXiv subjects

Krishna Kumar Balaraman

Publications and source records attributed to Krishna Kumar Balaraman.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

The Hourglass Revolution: A Theoretical Framework of AI's Impact on Organizational Structures in Developed and Emerging Markets

This paper presents a theoretical framework examining how artificial intelligence (AI) transforms organizational structures, introducing an "hourglass" configuration that emerges as AI assumes traditional middle management functions. The analysis identifies three key mechanisms algorithmic coordination, structural fluidity, and hybrid agency that demonstrate how AI enables organizational forms transcending traditional structural boundaries. These mechanisms illustrate how AI enables new modes of organizing to go beyond existing structural boundaries. Drawing on institutional theory and digital transformation research, we examine how these mechanisms operate differently in developed and emerging markets, producing distinct patterns of structural transformation. Our framework offers three important theoretical contributions: (1) conceptualizing algorithmic coordination as a unique form of organizational integration, (2) explaining how structural fluidity allows organizations to achieve stability and adaptability at the same time, and (3) the theoretical argument that hybrid agency surpasses traditional, human centric forms of organizational capabilities. Our analysis shows that while the move to AI enabled strategies overall seems quite global, successful application will need to pay sufficient attention to the technological capabilities, cultural dimensions, and contexts of the market.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2025

The Triad of Modern Democracies: Money, Identity, and Information in Shaping Power and Legitimacy

This article examines the interplay of money, identity, and information as a pivotal triad reshaping electoral politics and legitimacy in modern democracies, with insights from the United States, India, Germany, China, and Russia. Financial resources, through campaign finance and state funds, enable strategies exploiting identity cleavages like race, caste, and nationalism, amplified by digital networks such as social media and targeted messaging. In democracies, this dynamic fosters polarization and erodes trust, while in non democracies, it bolsters regime narratives. Drawing on political economy, social identity theory, and media studies, the study reveals a feedback loop: money shapes identity appeals, information disseminates them, and power consolidates, challenging issue based governance assumptions. Comparative analysis highlights the triad universal yet context specific impact, underscoring the need for reforms to address its effects on democratic theory and practice, as it entrenches elite influence and tribal divisions across diverse political systems.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2025

The Nexus of Money and Political Legitimacy: A Comparative Analysis of Democracies and Non-Democracies

This article examines the complex relationship between money and political legitimacy in democracies (United States, Germany, India) and nondemocracies (China, Russia), using published empirical evidence to explore how financial resources influence governance. In democracies, US campaign finance, German party funding, and Indias electoral bonds amplify elite influence, openly eroding public trust by skewing policy toward wealthy interests. In nondemocracies, Chinas state enterprise patronage and Russias oligarch suppression strengthen legitimacy, yet hide vulnerabilities revealed by anticorruption campaigns and power struggles. The analysis argues that moneys corrosive impact is widespread but varies: democracies face evident legitimacy crises, while nondemocracies conceal underlying fragility. These findings highlight the need for reforms: increased transparency in democracies and wider power bases in nondemocracies, to mitigate moneys distorting effect on political authority.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2025

The Paradox of Professional Input: How Expert Collaboration with AI Systems Shapes Their Future Value

This perspective paper examines a fundamental paradox in the relationship between professional expertise and artificial intelligence: as domain experts increasingly collaborate with AI systems by externalizing their implicit knowledge, they potentially accelerate the automation of their own expertise. Through analysis of multiple professional contexts, we identify emerging patterns in human-AI collaboration and propose frameworks for professionals to navigate this evolving landscape. Drawing on research in knowledge management, expertise studies, human-computer interaction, and labor economics, we develop a nuanced understanding of how professional value may be preserved and transformed in an era of increasingly capable AI systems. Our analysis suggests that while the externalization of tacit knowledge presents certain risks to traditional professional roles, it also creates opportunities for the evolution of expertise and the emergence of new forms of professional value. We conclude with implications for professional education, organizational design, and policy development that can help ensure the codification of expert knowledge enhances rather than diminishes the value of human expertise.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2025

Hedonic Adaptation in the Age of AI: A Perspective on Diminishing Satisfaction Returns in Technology Adoption

The fast paced progress of artificial intelligence (AI) through scaling laws connecting rising computational power with improving performance has created tremendous technological breakthroughs. These breakthroughs do not translate to corresponding user satisfaction improvements, resulting in a general mismatch. This research suggests that hedonic adaptation the psychological process by which people revert to a baseline state of happiness after drastic change provides a suitable model for understanding this phenomenon. We argue that user satisfaction with AI follows a logarithmic path, thus creating a longterm "satisfaction gap" as people rapidly get used to new capabilities as expectations. This process occurs through discrete stages: initial excitement, declining returns, stabilization, and sporadic resurgence, depending on adaptation rate and capability introduction. These processes have far reaching implications for AI research, user experience design, marketing, and ethics, suggesting a paradigm shift from sole technical scaling to methods that sustain perceived value in the midst of human adaptation. This perspective reframes AI development, necessitating practices that align technological progress with people's subjective experience.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2025

The Endurance of Identity-Based Voting: Evidence from the United States and Comparative Democracies

This study demonstrates the persistent dominance of identity based voting across democratic systems, using the United States as a primary case and comparative analyses of 19 other democracies as counterfactuals. Drawing solely on election data from the Roper Center (1976 through recent cycles), we employ OLS regression, ANOVA, and correlation tests to show that race remains the strongest predictor of party affiliation in the US (p < 0.001), with White voters favoring Republicans and Black voters consistently supporting Democrats (85% since 1988). Income, education, and gender exemplified by gaps like 10 points in 2020 further shape voting patterns, yet racial identity predominates. Comparative evidence from majoritarian (e.g., India), proportional (e.g., Germany through 2025), and hybrid (e.g., South Korea with a 25 point gender gap) systems reveals no democracy where issue based voting fully supplants identity based voting. Digital mobilization amplifies this trend globally. These findings underscore identity enduring role in electoral behavior, challenging assumptions of policy driven democratic choice.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2025

Artificial Intelligence Quotient (AIQ): A Novel Framework for Measuring Human-AI Collaborative Intelligence

As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly integrated into professional and personal domains, traditional metrics of human intelligence require reconceptualization. This paper introduces the Artificial Intelligence Quotient (AIQ), a novel measurement framework designed to assess an individual's capacity to effectively collaborate with and leverage AI systems, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs). Building upon established cognitive assessment methodologies and contemporary AI interaction research, we present a comprehensive framework for quantifying human-AI collaborative intelligence. This work addresses the growing need for standardized evaluation of AI-augmented cognitive capabilities in educational and professional contexts.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Skill-Based Labor Market Polarization in the Age of AI: A Comparative Analysis of India and the United States

This paper examines labor market polarization through a comparative analysis of skill-based employment and wage distributions in India and the United States during 2018-2023, with particular attention to differential automation risks and AI preparedness. Using detailed occupation-level data, automation risk metrics, and a series of statistical tests including wage premium analysis, employment share tests, and wage-employment regressions, we document significant structural differences in labor markets between developing and developed economies. Our analysis yields four key findings. First, we find statistically significant differences in employment distribution patterns, with India showing disproportionate concentration in low-skill employment compared to the US, particularly in occupations with high automation risk. Second, regression analysis reveals that wage premiums differ systematically between the two countries, with significantly larger skill-based wage gaps in India. Third, we find robust evidence of a negative relationship between employment size and wages, suggesting stronger labor supply effects in developing economies. Fourth, analysis of occupation-specific automation risk reveals that developing economies face a "double vulnerability" - concentration of employment in both low-skill occupations and jobs with higher automation potential, complicated by lower AI preparedness scores. These findings provide novel empirical evidence on how development stages influence labor market polarization patterns and carry important implications for skill development and technology adoption policies in developing economies. Our results suggest that traditional approaches to labor market development may need significant modification to account for the differential impacts of AI across development stages.

econ.GN↗