Kristinn R. Thórisson

arXiv2026

ICE-ID: A Novel Historical Census Dataset for Longitudinal Identity Resolution

We introduce \textbf{ICE-ID}, a benchmark dataset comprising 984,028 records from 16 Icelandic census waves spanning 220 years (1703--1920), with 226,864 expert-curated person identifiers. ICE-ID combines hierarchical geography (farm$\to$parish$\to$district$\to$county), patronymic naming conventions, sparse kinship links (partner, father, mother), and multi-decadal temporal drift -- challenges not captured by standard product-matching or citation datasets. This paper presents an artifact-backed analysis of temporal coverage, missingness, identifier ambiguity, candidate-generation efficiency, and cluster distributions, and situates ICE-ID against classical ER benchmarks (Abt--Buy, Amazon--Google, DBLP--ACM, DBLP--Scholar, Walmart--Amazon, iTunes--Amazon, Beer, Fodors--Zagats). We also define a deployment-faithful temporal OOD protocol and release the dataset, splits, regeneration scripts, analysis artifacts, and a dashboard for interactive exploration. Baseline model comparisons and end-to-end ER results are reported in the companion methods paper.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2016

Why Artificial Intelligence Needs a Task Theory --- And What It Might Look Like

The concept of "task" is at the core of artificial intelligence (AI): Tasks are used for training and evaluating AI systems, which are built in order to perform and automatize tasks we deem useful. In other fields of engineering theoretical foundations allow thorough evaluation of designs by methodical manipulation of well understood parameters with a known role and importance; this allows an aeronautics engineer, for instance, to systematically assess the effects of wind speed on an airplane's performance and stability. No framework exists in AI that allows this kind of methodical manipulation: Performance results on the few tasks in current use (cf. board games, question-answering) cannot be easily compared, however similar or different. The issue is even more acute with respect to artificial *general* intelligence systems, which must handle unanticipated tasks whose specifics cannot be known beforehand. A *task theory* would enable addressing tasks at the *class* level, bypassing their specifics, providing the appropriate formalization and classification of tasks, environments, and their parameters, resulting in more rigorous ways of measuring, comparing, and evaluating intelligent behavior. Even modest improvements in this direction would surpass the current ad-hoc nature of machine learning and AI evaluation. Here we discuss the main elements of the argument for a task theory and present an outline of what it might look like for physical tasks.

cs.AI↗