arXiv subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Krzysztof C. Kiwiel.
We show that several versions of Floyd and Rivest's improved algorithm Select for finding the $k$th smallest of $n$ elements require at most $n+\min\{k,n-k\}+O(n^{1/2}\ln^{1/2}n)$ comparisons on average and with high probability. This rectifies the analysis of Floyd and Rivest, and extends it to the case of nondistinct elements. Encouraging computational results on large median-finding problems are reported.
We show that several versions of Floyd and Rivest's algorithm Select [Comm.\ ACM {\bf 18} (1975) 173] for finding the $k$th smallest of $n$ elements require at most $n+\min\{k,n-k\}+o(n)$ comparisons on average, even when equal elements occur. This parallels our recent analysis of another variant due to Floyd and Rivest [Comm. ACM {\bf 18} (1975) 165--172]. Our computational results suggest that both variants perform well in practice, and may compete with other selection methods, such as Hoare's Find or quickselect with median-of-3 pivots.
We introduce several modifications of the partitioning schemes used in Hoare's quicksort and quickselect algorithms, including ternary schemes which identify keys less or greater than the pivot. We give estimates for the numbers of swaps made by each scheme. Our computational experiments indicate that ternary schemes allow quickselect to identify all keys equal to the selected key at little additional cost.
We show that several versions of Floyd and Rivest's algorithm Select for finding the $k$th smallest of $n$ elements require at most $n+\min\{k,n-k\}+o(n)$ comparisons on average and with high probability. This rectifies the analysis of Floyd and Rivest, and extends it to the case of nondistinct elements. Our computational results confirm that Select may be the best algorithm in practice.
We show that several versions of Floyd and Rivest's algorithm Select for finding the $k$th smallest of $n$ elements require at most $n+\min\{k,n-k\}+o(n)$ comparisons on average and with high probability. This rectifies the analysis of Floyd and Rivest, and extends it to the case of nondistinct elements. Our computational results confirm that Select may be the best algorithm in practice.