arXiv subjects

Kshitiz Upadhyay

Publications and source records attributed to Kshitiz Upadhyay.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Operator-Informed Gaussian Processes for Complex Helmholtz Wavefields: From Synthetic Benchmarks to In Vivo Brain Elastography

The Helmholtz equation governs time-harmonic wave propagation, and in dissipative media a complex modulus renders its squared wavenumber $κ^2$ complex. Inferring such fields from sparse, noisy data calls for solvers that also quantify their own uncertainty. Physics-informed Gaussian-process (GP) regression supplies this by returning a posterior over the solution, yet operator-conditioned formulations have been developed almost exclusively for real-valued fields. We extend operator-informed GP regression to complex-valued Helmholtz problems by realifying the complex operator into an equivalent coupled real block, which enables inference with standard real-valued GP conditioning. The construction admits a family of priors, from a proper diagonal prior to coregionalized and multiscale variants, and conditions on PDE residuals and boundary traces. On benchmark problems in one to three dimensions, the solver is competitive with finite-difference and neural-network baselines at a far smaller interior-constraint budget. Unlike those deterministic baselines, it returns a posterior over the complex wavefield rather than a point estimate. Applied to \textit{in vivo} brain magnetic resonance elastography, a proper multiscale prior reconstructs the shear curl field to a correlation of $0.77$ with measurement, above a $0.75$ target. The gain arises from the multiscale kernel rather than from real--imaginary coupling. We further identify a low-frequency accuracy ceiling set by model mismatch and a posterior uncertainty that is not yet calibrated. Calibrated uncertainty therefore emerges as the central next step for probabilistic wavefield inference in dissipative media.

stat.ML↗

arXiv2026

Process-fracture mapping of a DLP-printed photopolymer using Bayesian active learning and surrogate-based sensitivity analysis

Digital light processing (DLP) enables rapid fabrication of polymer structures, but fracture performance depends on multiple interacting processing variables, making exhaustive experimental characterization impractical. This work presents a data-efficient framework for process-fracture mapping of a DLP-printed photopolymer using Bayesian active learning and digital image correlation (DIC)-assisted Mode I fracture experiments. Four processing parameters were considered: layer angle, UV exposure time, layer height, and print temperature. Fracture resistance was quantified by the critical J-integral, $J_c$, obtained from three-point-bending tests with DIC-based evaluation of crack-mouth opening displacement and hinge-point kinematics. Beginning with two randomly selected conditions, Gaussian process regression (GPR) and a modified upper confidence bound (UCB)-style acquisition function selected 26 additional experiments, yielding 28 processing conditions with three replicates each. The final GPR surrogate reproduced the training data with $R^2=0.99$ and achieved leave-one-out cross-validation performance of $R^2=0.63$ and Pearson $r=0.81$. Surrogate-based sensitivity analysis quantified parameter effects and global contributions. One-at-a-time response curves revealed nonlinear conditional trends, while global Sobol analysis identified UV exposure time as the dominant processing variable, with first-order and total-order indices of 0.6780 and 0.7581, respectively. Based on total-order influence, the parameters ranked as UV exposure time, layer angle, print temperature, and layer height. The first-order Sobol indices summed to 0.8058, indicating non-negligible interaction and higher-order effects. These results demonstrate that Bayesian-active-learning-guided experimentation can efficiently recover process-fracture relationships and parameter interactions from a sparse experimental campaign.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2026

History Matters: Damage-Mediated Amplification of Brain Deformation and Injury Risk under Repeated Head Impacts

Computational head models are typically applied to isolated impacts, leaving repeated head loading largely unexplored. An Ogden-Roxburgh Mullins damage formulation was implemented in a high-fidelity finite element head model to represent loading-history-dependent softening during cyclic brain-tissue deformation. Repeated-loading histories derived from mixed martial arts head-impact data were applied and compared with damage-free hyperelastic (HE) and linear visco-hyperelastic (LVHE) model variants. Under five identical single-axis cycles, Mullins-type softening progressively increased strain and strain rate metrics relative to the HE model. Mullins-based injury probabilities progressively exceeded strain-based HE predictions and diverged from unchanged kinematics-based predictions, indicating that neglecting prior softening may underestimate injury risk. In a randomized twenty-cycle multiaxial sequence, cycles of similar kinematic intensity produced different deformation and injury-risk estimates depending on prior softening. HE and LVHE models predicted higher injury probabilities initially, whereas the Mullins-based model produced the largest later-cycle estimates and highest probability of at least one injury over the sequence. Regional amplification depended on loading direction and prior softening, with no direction-independent trend among brain substructures. Gyral elements exhibited higher cumulative maximum principal strain than sulcal elements, which showed greater amplification relative to initial responses. These findings demonstrate that short-term damage-mediated softening can substantially amplify tissue deformation and injury-risk estimates beyond damage-free head models under the same loading histories. Further experimental characterization of cyclic brain-tissue softening is needed to improve models of repeated head loading and traumatic brain injury.

q-bio.TO↗

arXiv2026

A constitutive framework for distortional-mode-dependent failure in soft materials: Tension-compression asymmetry and beyond

Soft materials exhibit pronounced tension-compression asymmetry (TCA) in their softening and failure, a feature that conventional hyperelastic and continuum-damage formulations fail to capture in a unified framework. We present a Lode-invariant-based hyperelastic softening model for distortional-mode-dependent failure in soft materials, where mode dependence is introduced through a bi-failure construction with distinct tensile and compressive energy limiters. The proposed model extends Volokh's classical energy-limiting approach by embedding a Lode-angle-dependent weighting function, ensuring a smooth and physically consistent transition in failure across distortion modes within the constitutive description of the bulk response, without introducing internal damage variables. Agarose hydrogels (1, 2, and 3 % w/v) serve as the validation system. The framework reproduces experimental stress-stretch responses in uniaxial tension and compression, capturing concentration-dependent stiffness and failure energetics. Using parameters calibrated solely from combined uniaxial data, the model predicts pure shear behavior, including softening and failure, thereby demonstrating strong cross-mode predictive capability. To further assess thermodynamic consistency and distortion-mode sensitivity, the model's free-energy landscape is analyzed across the full Lode-invariant space, confirming a smooth and physically consistent response under diverse loading conditions. Parameter evolution with concentration follows power-law scaling, enabling interpolation and predictive validation at intermediate concentrations (evaluated at 2.5 % w/v). Overall, the proposed formulation provides a physically interpretable constitutive framework for tension-compression-asymmetric softening and distortional-mode-dependent failure, and establishes a foundation for three-dimensional failure mapping in soft materials.

cond-mat.soft↗

arXiv2026

A physics-informed data-driven framework for modeling hyperelastic materials with progressive damage and failure

This work presents a two-stage physics-informed, data-driven constitutive modeling framework for hyperelastic soft materials undergoing progressive damage and failure. The framework is grounded in the concept of hyperelasticity with energy limiters and employs Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) to separately learn the intact (undamaged) elastic response and damage evolution directly from data. In Stage I, GPR models learn the intact hyperelastic response through volumetric and isochoric response functions (or only the isochoric response under incompressibility), ensuring energetic consistency of the intact response and satisfaction of fundamental principles such as material frame indifference and balance of angular momentum. In Stage II, damage is modeled via a separate GPR model that learns the mapping between the intact strain energy density predicted by Stage I models and a stress-reduction factor governing damage and failure, with monotonicity, non-negativity, and complete-failure constraints enforced through penalty-based optimization to ensure thermodynamic admissibility. Validation on synthetic datasets, including benchmarking against analytical constitutive models and competing data-driven approaches, demonstrates high in-distribution accuracy under uniaxial tension and robust generalization from limited training data to compression and shear modes not used during training. Application to experimental brain tissue data demonstrates the practical applicability of the framework and enables inference of damage evolution and critical failure energy. Overall, the proposed framework combines the physical consistency, interpretability, and generalizability of analytical models with the flexibility, predictive accuracy, and automation of machine learning, offering a powerful approach for modeling failure in soft materials under limited experimental data.

cs.CE↗

arXiv2025

A Physics-Informed Data-Driven Discovery for Constitutive Modeling of Compressible, Nonlinear, History-Dependent Soft Materials under Multiaxial Cyclic Loading

We propose a general hybrid physics-informed machine learning framework for modeling nonlinear, history-dependent viscoelastic behavior under multiaxial cyclic loading. The approach is built on a generalized internal state variable-based visco-hyperelastic constitutive formulation, where stress is decomposed into volumetric, isochoric hyperelastic, and isochoric viscoelastic components. Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) models the equilibrium response, while Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) units capture time-dependent viscoelastic effects. Physical constraints, including objectivity, material symmetry, and thermodynamic consistency, are enforced to ensure physically valid predictions. After developing the general form of the surrogate model based on tensor integrity bases and response functions, we employed the nonlinear Holzapfel differential viscoelastic model to generate training data. Two datasets, one for short-term and another for long-term relaxation, are constructed to span a wide range of material memory characteristics. The model is trained and tested under diverse multiaxial loading conditions, including different stretch levels applied independently in the longitudinal and transverse directions, varying strain rates, and both tension and compression states, even beyond the training domain. Energy dissipation is explicitly analyzed at different strain rates for both datasets to verify thermodynamic consistency through the second law. The results show that the proposed framework accurately captures complex, nonlinear, and rate-dependent material responses. Moreover, it demonstrates strong robustness to synthetic noise, enabling generalizable and physically consistent predictions under realistic and variable loading scenarios.

cond-mat.soft↗

arXiv2025

Stress Softening Damage in Strongly Nonlinear Viscoelastic Soft Materials A Physics Informed Data Driven Constitutive Model with Time Temperature Coupling

This study presents a novel physics informed, data-driven modeling framework for capturing the strongly nonlinear thermo-viscoelastic behavior of soft materials exhibiting stress softening, with emphasis on the Mullins effect. Unlike previous approaches limited to quasi-static or isothermal conditions, our model unifies rate dependence, temperature sensitivity, large strain cyclic loading, and evolving damage mechanisms. Thermodynamic admissibility is ensured via a custom loss function that embeds the Clausius Duhem inequality and explicitly constrains the damage variable for physically realistic softening. A Temporal Convolutional Network is trained on high fidelity experimental data across multiple temperatures, strain rates, and stretch levels, enabling the model to capture rich thermomechanical coupling and history dependence. The framework generalizes to unseen thermo mechanical conditions, higher strain rates, and larger deformations, and remains robust to input noise. Validation against finite element simulations using Abaqus/Explicit demonstrates excellent agreement under cyclic loading and damage evolution, confirming the surrogate models effectiveness for advanced simulation workflows.

cond-mat.soft↗

arXiv2023

Physics-informed Data-driven Discovery of Constitutive Models with Application to Strain-Rate-sensitive Soft Materials

A novel data-driven constitutive modeling approach is proposed, which combines the physics-informed nature of modeling based on continuum thermodynamics with the benefits of machine learning. This approach is demonstrated on strain-rate-sensitive soft materials. This model is based on the viscous dissipation-based visco-hyperelasticity framework where the total stress is decomposed into volumetric, isochoric hyperelastic, and isochoric viscous overstress contributions. It is shown that each of these stress components can be written as linear combinations of the components of an irreducible integrity basis. Three Gaussian process regression-based surrogate models are trained (one per stress component) between principal invariants of strain and strain rate tensors and the corresponding coefficients of the integrity basis components. It is demonstrated that this type of model construction enforces key physics-based constraints on the predicted responses: the second law of thermodynamics, the principles of local action and determinism, objectivity, the balance of angular momentum, an assumed reference state, isotropy, and limited memory. The three surrogate models that constitute our constitutive model are evaluated by training them on small-size numerically generated data sets corresponding to a single deformation mode and then analyzing their predictions over a much wider testing regime comprising multiple deformation modes. Our physics-informed data-driven constitutive model predictions are compared with the corresponding predictions of classical continuum thermodynamics-based and purely data-driven models. It is shown that our surrogate models can reasonably capture the stress-strain-strain rate responses in both training and testing regimes, and provide improvements in terms of prediction accuracy, generalizability to multiple deformation modes, and compatibility with limited data.

cs.CE↗

arXiv2022

Data-driven Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Human Head Models

Computational models of the human head are promising tools for estimating the impact-induced response of brain, and thus play an important role in the prediction of traumatic brain injury. Modern biofidelic head model simulations are associated with very high computational cost, and high-dimensional inputs and outputs, which limits the applicability of traditional uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods on these systems. In this study, a two-stage, data-driven manifold learning-based framework is proposed for UQ of computational head models. This framework is demonstrated on a 2D subject-specific head model, where the goal is to quantify uncertainty in the simulated strain fields (i.e., output), given variability in the material properties of different brain substructures (i.e., input). In the first stage, a data-driven method based on multi-dimensional Gaussian kernel-density estimation and diffusion maps is used to generate realizations of the input random vector directly from the available data. Computational simulations of a small number of realizations provide input-output pairs for training data-driven surrogate models in the second stage. The surrogate models employ nonlinear dimensionality reduction using Grassmannian diffusion maps, Gaussian process regression to create a low-cost mapping between the input random vector and the reduced solution space, and geometric harmonics models for mapping between the reduced space and the Grassmann manifold. It is demonstrated that the surrogate models provide highly accurate approximations of the computational model while significantly reducing the computational cost. Monte Carlo simulations of the surrogate models are used for uncertainty propagation. UQ of strain fields highlight significant spatial variation in model uncertainty, and reveal key differences in uncertainty among commonly used strain-based brain injury predictor variables.

physics.bio-ph↗