SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Léo Pfitzner

Publications and source records attributed to Léo Pfitzner.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Contribution of expert aggregation to temperature prediction part i

Many Numerical Weather Prediction models and their associated Post-Processed Models are available. Combining all of these predictions in an optimal way is however not straightforward. This can be achieved thanks to Expert Aggregation (EA) which has many advantages, such as being online, being adaptive to model changes and having theoretical guarantees. In this paper, we propose a method for making deterministic temperature predictions with EA. We used Exponentially Weighted Average, MLprod and MLpol and Bernstein Online Aggregation. Hence, we combine and outperform the forecasts of the raw and post-processed Integrated Forecasting System (IFS), forecasts of Application of Research to Operations at Mesoscale (AROME), Action de Recherche Petite Echelle Grande Echelle (ARPEGE) and quantiles of the post processed Pr{é}vision d'Ensemble ARPEGE (PEARP). We also compare the different EA strategies in various settings and show that they outperform the National Blend of Models. Finally, we discuss certain limitations.

math.OC

Contribution of expert aggregation to temperature prediction part II: Second order bounds with sleeping experts

In this paper we improve on the temperature predictions made with (online) Expert Aggregation (EA) [Cesa-Bianchi and Lugosi, 2006] in Part I. In particular, we make the aggregation more reactive, whilst maintaining at least the same root mean squared error and reducing the number of large errors. We have achieved this by using the Sleeping Expert Framework (SEF) [Freund et al., 1997, Devaine et al., 2013], which allows the more efficient use of biased experts (bad on average but which may be good at some point). To deal with the fact that, unlike in Devaine et al. [2013], we do not know in advance when to use these biased experts, we resorted to gradient boosted regression trees [Chen and Guestrin, 2016] and provide regret bounds against sequences of experts [Mourtada and Maillard, 2017] which take into account this uncertainty. We applied this in a fully online way on BOA [Wintenberger, 2024], an adaptive aggregation with second order regret bounds, which had the best results in Part I. Finally, we made a meta-aggregation with the EA follow the leader. This chooses whether or not to use the SEF in order to limit the possible noise added by the SEF.

math.OC