arXiv subjects

L. Caves

Publications and source records attributed to L. Caves.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

$^{28}$Al Half-life Measurement and the negative mirror asymmetry between the $^{28}$Al($\beta^-$)$^{28m}$Si and $^{28}$P($\beta^+$)$^{28m}$Si decays

In the past, the mirror asymmetry parameter has been proposed as a probing mechanism for the presence of beyond the Standard Model second-class currents in nuclear beta decay transitions. However, this was hindered by large uncertainties in the required nuclear structure correction terms. Recently, a new calculation of these corrections attempted, but could not fully explain the negative mirror asymmetry between the $^{28}$Al($\beta^-$)$^{28m}$Si and $^{28}$P($\beta^+$)$^{28m}$Si decays. To put the mirror asymmetry parameter on a more solid footing, the half-life of $^{28}$Al was measured for the first time using a radioactive ion beam at the Nuclear Science Laboratory of the University of Notre Dame. The new result, $t_{1/2}=$134.432(34) s, is consistent with most of the past data except for one highly discrepant measurement. The new mirror asymmetry parameter of -3.5(10)$\%$ obtained still does not agree with nuclear structure calculations.

nucl-ex↗

arXiv2021

Remeasuring the anomalously enhanced $B(E2; 2^+ \rightarrow 1^+)$ in $^8\mathrm{Li}$

The large reported $E2$ strength between the $2^+$ ground state and $1^+$ first excited state of $\isotope[8]{Li}$, $B(E2; 2^+ \rightarrow 1^+)= 55(15)\,e^2\fm^4$, presents a puzzle. Unlike in neighboring $A=7\text{--}9$ isotopes, where enhanced $E2$ strengths may be understood to arise from deformation as rotational in-band transitions, the $2^+\rightarrow1^+$ transition in $^8$Li cannot be understood in any simple way as a rotational in-band transition. Moreover, the reported strength exceeds \textit{ab initio} predictions by an order of magnitude. In light of this discrepancy, we revisited the Coulomb excitation measurement of this strength, now using particle-$\gamma$ coincidences, yielding a revised $B(E2; 2^+ \rightarrow 1^+)$ of $19(^{+7}_{-6})(2)$~e$^2$fm$^4$. We explore how this value compares to what might be expected in the limits of rotational models. While the present value is about a factor of three smaller than previously reported, it remains anomalously enhanced.

nucl-ex↗