Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

L. Fatibene

Publications and source records attributed to L. Fatibene.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2025

Lecture Notes in Loop Quantum Gravity. LN3: Boundary equations for Ashtekar-Barbero-Immirzi model

We shall here perform the canonical analysis of field equations of ABI model in order to determine constraint equations. We shall show that one can use algebraic constraints in the covariant framework to fix $k^i$ as a function of the frame and obtain a model where $(A^i_a, E_i^a)$ is a pair of independent fields which are also a pair of conjugated fields. We shall not impose any relation on Immirzi parameter $\beta$ and Holst parameter $\gamma$, still constraint equations will depend on $\beta$ only and they agree with standard result of LQG which are obtained by a suitable canonical transformation on a leaf of the ADM foliation used to define a Hamiltonian framework. We eventually state the scheme for quantization that will be discussed in the following lecture notes.

gr-qc↗
arXiv2024

Lecture Notes in Loop Quantum Gravity. LN2: Cauchy problems and pre-quantum states

We discuss the structure of covariant equations, relating analytical properties of solutions to algebraic properties of the corresponding differential operator, specifically of its principal symbol. The principal symbol and its globality is discussed for a general quasi-linear PDE system, regardless the algebraic structure the configuration space can have. We also discuss how the typical relativistic model can be under-determined and over-determined at the same time as well as how one can define out of it a well-posed Cauchy problem. This issue leads us to pre-quantum configurations and Cauchy bubbles as the way to set up evolution problems in a compact region of spacetime, taking into account that relativistic models are defined on bare manifolds. The typical application we shall sketch is standard GR.

gr-qc↗
arXiv2024

Introduction to Loop Quantum Gravity. The Holst's action and the covariant formalism

We review Holst formalism and we discuss dynamical equivalence with standard GR (in dimension 4). Holst formalism is written for a spin coframe field $e^I_\mu$ and a $Spin(3,1)$-connection $\omega^{IJ}_\mu$ on spacetime $M$ and it depends on the Holst parameter $\gamma\in \mathbb{R}-\{0\}$. We show the model is dynamically equivalent to standard GR, in the sense that up to a pointwise $Spin(3,1)$-gauge transformation acting on frame indices, solutions of the two models are in one-to-one correspondence. Hence the two models are classically equivalent. One can also introduce new variables by splitting the spin connection into a pair of a $Spin(3)$-connection $A^i_\mu$ and a $Spin(3)$-valued 1-form $k^i_\mu$. The construction of these new variables relies on a particular algebraic structure, called a reductive splitting. A reductive splitting is a weaker structure than requiring that the gauge group splits as the products of two sub-groups, as it happens in Euclidean signature in the selfdual formulation originally introduced in this context by Ashtekar, and it still allows to deal with the Lorentzian signature without resorting to complexifications. The reductive splitting of $SL(2, \mathbb{C})$ is not unique and it is parameterized by a real parameter $\beta$, called the Immirzi parameter. The splitting is here done on spacetime, not on space, to obtain a $Spin(3)$-connection $A^i_\mu$, which is called the Barbero-Immirzi connection on spacetime. One obtains a covariant model depending on the fields $(e^I_\mu, A^i_\mu, k^i_\mu)$ which is again dynamically equivalent to standard GR (as well as the Holst action). Usually, in the literature one sets $\beta=\gamma$ for the sake of simplicity. Here we keep the Holst and Immirzi parameters distinct to show that eventually, only $\beta$ will survive in boundary field equations.

gr-qc↗
arXiv2023

A variational framework for higher order perturbations

A covariant, global, variational framework for perturbations in field theories is presented. Perturbations are obtained as vertical vector fields on the configuration bundle and they drag, exactly, solution into solutions. The flow of a perturbation drags solutions into solutions and the dragged perturbed solutions can be expanded in a series with respect to the flow parameter, hence it contains perturbations at any order. Mechanics is included as a special case. As a simple application, we recover the well-known discussion about stability of geodesics on a sphere $S_2$.

math-ph↗
arXiv2023

Relativistic GPS in 3-dimensions

We extend to three dimensions the proposal of a completely relativistic positioning system (rPS). The system does not rely on approximations, in fact, it works at a few Schwarzschild radii from a black hole, and it does not rely on Newtonian physics or special relativity. Since general relativity (GR) claims to be our fundamental framework to describe classical physics, it must provide tools to bootstrap physics within the theory itself, without relying on previous approximated frameworks. The rPS is able to self-diagnose, that is, it detects deviations from assumptions about the gravitational field and consequently stops operations; in addition it is robust, i.e., it is able to autonomously restore operations when assumptions are restored. From a more general viewpoint, the rPS is equivalent to geodesy in spacetime, which establishes a (conventional) coordinate system on a surface by means of measurements within the surface itself, as well as allowing it to extract information about the intrinsic geometry of the same surface. In other words, the positioning system is potentially able to extract information about the gravitational field (which in fact is identified with the geometry of spacetime) in addition to the gravitational theory, which describes its dynamics. Thus, it becomes a framework within which one can operationally distinguish different theories of gravitation.

gr-qc↗
arXiv2022

The effective Equation of State in Palatini $f(R)$ cosmology

We investigate how the cosmological Equation of State can be used for scrutinizing extended theories of gravity, in particular, the Palatini $f(R)$ gravity. Specifically, the approach consists, at first, in investigating the effective Equation of State produced by a given model. Then, the inverse problem can also be considered in view of determining which models are compatible with a given effective Equation of State. We consider and solve some cases and show that, for example, power-law models are (the only models) capable of transforming barotropic Equations of State into effective barotropic ones. Moreover, the form of Equation of State is preserved (only) for $f(R)=R$, as expected. In this perspective, modified Equations of State are a feature capable of distinguishing Extended Gravity with respect to General Relativity. We also investigate quadratic and non-homogeneous effective Equations of State showing, in particular, that they contain the Starobinsky model and other ones.

gr-qc↗
arXiv2019

Conformal gravity: light deflection revisited and the galactic rotation curve failure

We show how Conformal Gravity (CG) has to satisfy a fine-tuning condition to describe the rotation curves of disk galaxies without the aid of dark matter. Interpreting CG as a gauge natural theory yields conservation laws and their associated superpotentials without ambiguities. We consider the light deflection of a point-like lens and impose that the two Schwarzschild-like metrics with and without the lens are identical at infinite distances from the lens. The energy conservation law implies that the parameter $γ$ in the linear term of the metric has to vanish, otherwise the two metrics are physically inaccessible from each other. This linear term is responsible to mimic the role of dark matter in disk galaxies and gravitational lensing systems. Our analysis shows that removing the need of dark matter with CG thus relies on a fine-tuning condition on $γ$. We also illustrate why the results of previous investigations of gravitational lensing in CG largely disagree. These discrepancies derive from the erroneous use of the deflection angle definition adopted in General Relativity, where the vacuum solution is asymptotically flat, unlike CG. In addition, the lens mass is identified with various combinations of the metric parameters. However, these identifications are arbitrary, because the mass is not a conformally invariant quantity, unlike the conserved charge associated to the energy conservation law. Based on this conservation law and by removing the fine-tuning condition on $γ$, i.e. by setting $γ=0$, the energy difference between the metric with the point-like lens and the metric without it defines a conformally invariant quantity that can in principle be used for (1) a proper derivation of light deflection in CG, and (2) the identification of the lens mass with a function of the parameters $β$ and $k$ of the Schwarzschild-like metric.

astro-ph.CO↗
arXiv2019

Spin frame transformations and Dirac equations

We define spin frames, with the aim of extending spin structures from the category of (pseudo-)Riemannian manifolds to the category of spin manifolds with a fixed signature on them, though with no selected metric structure. Because of this softer requirements, transformations allowed by spin frames are more general than usual spin transformations and they usually do not preserve the induced metric structures. We study how these new transformations affect connections both on the spin bundle and on the frame bundle and how this reflects on the Dirac equations.

math.DG↗
arXiv2018

Hubble drift in Palatini $f(\mathcal{R})$-theories

In a Palatini $f(\mathcal{R})$-model, we define chonodynamical effects due to the choice of atomic clocks as standard reference clocks and we develop a formalism able to quantitatively separate them from the usual effective dark sources one has in extended theories. We apply the formalism to Hubble drift and briefly discuss the issue about the physical frame. In particular, we argue that there is no physical frame in the sense one does different things in different frames and that, in a sense, is the physical characteristic of extended gravity. As an example, we discuss how Jordan frame may be well suited to discuss cosmology, though it fails within the solar system.

gr-qc↗
arXiv2016

Strong gravitational lensing in $f\left(χ\right)=χ^{3/2}$ gravity

We discuss the phenomenology of gravitational lensing in the purely metric $f\left(χ\right)$ gravity, an $f(R)$ gravity where the action of the gravitational field depends on the source mass. We focus on the strong lensing regime in galaxy-galaxy lens systems and in clusters of galaxies. Using an approximate metric solution accurate to second order of the velocity field $v/c$, we show how, in the $f\left(χ\right)=χ^{3/2}$ gravity, the same light deflection can be produced by point-like lenses with masses smaller than in General Relativity; this mass difference increases with increasing impact parameter and decreasing lens mass. However, for sufficiently massive point-like lenses and small impact parameters, $f\left(χ\right)=χ^{3/2}$ and GR yield indistinguishable light deflection angles: this regime occurs both in observed galaxy-galaxy lens systems and in the central regions of galaxy clusters. In the former systems, the GR and $f\left(χ\right)$ masses are compatible with the mass of standard stellar populations and little or no dark matter, whereas, on the scales of the core of galaxy clusters, the presence of substantial dark matter is required both in General Relativity, and in our approximate $f\left(χ\right)=χ^{3/2}$ point-like lens solution. We thus conclude that our approximate metric solution of $f\left(χ\right)=χ^{3/2}$ is unable to describe the observed phenomenology of the strong lensing regime without the aid of dark matter.

astro-ph.CO↗
arXiv2016

Constraining the Physical State by Symmetries

After reviewing the hole argument and its relations with initial value problem and general covariance, we shall discuss how much freedom one has to define the physical state of a system in a generally covariant (or gauge covariant) field theory. We shall show that in gauge covariant theories (and generally covariant theories with a a compact space) one has no freedom and one is forced to declare as physically equivalent two configurations which differ by a gauge transformation (or by a global spacetime diffeomorphism), as it is usually prescribed. On the contrary, when space is not compact, the result proven for the compact case does not hold true and one may have different options to define physically equivalent configurations, still preserving determinism.

gr-qc↗
arXiv2015

Equivalence among frames in extended gravity

We shall discuss equivalence of frames in Palatini f(R)-theories at action level. A Palatini formulation of Brans-Dicke theories (equivalent to the purely metric ones) will also be discussed.

gr-qc↗
arXiv2015

Generally Covariant vs. Gauge Structure for Conformal Field Theories

We introduce the natural lift of spacetime diffeomorphisms for conformal gravity and discuss the physical equivalence between the natural and gauge natural structure of the theory. Accordingly, we argue that conformal transformations must be introduced as gauge transformations (affecting fields but not spacetime point) and then discuss special structures implied by the splitting of the conformal group.

gr-qc↗
arXiv2015

Gauge Natural Formulation of Conformal Theory of Gravity

We consider conformal gravity as a gauge natural theory. We study its conservation laws and superpotentials. We also consider the Mannheim and Kazanas spherically symmetric vacuum solution and discuss conserved quantities associated to conformal and diffeomorphism symmetries.

gr-qc↗
arXiv2014

Extended Gravity

We shall show equivalence between Palatini-$f(\calR)$ theories and Brans-Dicke (BD) theories at the level of action principles in generic dimension with generic matter coupling. We do that by introducing the Helmholtz Lagrangian associated to Palatini-$f(\calR)$ theory and then performing frame transformations in order to recover Einstein frame and Brans-Dicke frame. This clarifies the relation among different formulations and the transformations among different frames. Additionally, it defines a formulation {\it a lá Palatini} for the Brans-Dicke theory which is dynamically equivalent to metric BD (unlike the standard Palatini-formulation of metric BD theory which are {\it not} dynamically equivalent). In conclusion we discuss interpretation of extended theories of gravitation and perspectives.

gr-qc↗
arXiv2013

Mathematical Equivalence vs. Physical Equivalence between Extended Theories of Gravitations

We shall show that although Palatini f(R)-theories are equivalent to Brans-Dicke theories, still the first pass the Mercury precession of perihelia test, while the second do not. We argue that the two models are not physically equivalent due to a different assumptions about free fall. We shall also go through perihelia test without fixing a conformal gauge (clocks or rulers) in order to highlight what can be measured in a conformal invariant way and what cannot. We shall argue that the conformal gauge is broken by choosing a definition of clock, rulers or, equivalently, of masses.

gr-qc↗
arXiv2012

Do Barbero-Immirzi connections exist in different dimensions and signatures?

We shall show that no reductive splitting of the spin group exists in dimension 3 \leq m \leq 20 other than in dimension m = 4. In dimension 4 there are reductive splittings in any signature. Euclidean and Lorentzian signatures are reviewed in particular and signature (2, 2) is investigated explicitly in detail. Reductive splittings allow to define a global SU(2)-connection over spacetime which encodes in an weird way the holonomy of the standard spin connection. The standard Barbero-Immirzi (BI) connection used in LQG is then obtained by restriction to a spacelike slice. This mechanism provides a good control on globality and covariance of BI connection showing that in dimension other than 4 one needs to provide some other mechanism to define the analogous of BI connection and control its globality.

gr-qc↗