Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

L. Perivolaropoulos

Publications and source records attributed to L. Perivolaropoulos.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Cosmological Horizons, Uncertainty Principle and Maximum Length Quantum Mechanics

The cosmological particle horizon is the maximum measurable length in the Universe. The existence of such a maximum observable length scale implies a modification of the quantum uncertainty principle. Thus due to non-locality of quantum mechanics, the global properties of the Universe could produce a signature on the behaviour of local quantum systems. A Generalized Uncertainty Principle (GUP) that is consistent with the existence of such a maximum observable length scale $l_{max}$ is $Δx Δp \geq \frac{\hbar}{2}\;\frac{1}{1-αΔx^2}$ where $α= l_{max}^{-2}\simeq (H_0/c)^2$ ($H_0$ is the Hubble parameter and $c$ is the speed of light). In addition to the existence of a maximum measurable length $l_{max}=\frac{1}{\sqrt α}$, this form of GUP implies also the existence of a minimum measurable momentum $p_{min}=\frac{3 \sqrt{3}}{4}\hbar \sqrtα$. Using appropriate representation of the position and momentum quantum operators we show that the spectrum of the one dimensional harmonic oscillator becomes $\bar{\mathcal{E}}_n=2n+1+λ_n \barα$ where $\bar{\mathcal{E}}_n\equiv 2E_n/\hbar ω$ is the dimensionless properly normalized $n^{th}$ energy level, $\barα$ is a dimensionless parameter with $\barα\equiv α\hbar/m ω$ and $λ_n\sim n^2$ for $n\gg 1$ (we show the full form of $λ_n$ in the text). For a typical vibrating diatomic molecule and $l_{max}=c/H_0$ we find $\barα\sim 10^{-77}$ and therefore for such a system, this effect is beyond reach of current experiments. However, this effect could be more important in the early universe and could produce signatures in the primordial perturbation spectrum induced by quantum fluctuations of the inflaton field.

gr-qc↗

Propagation of gravitational waves in an expanding background in the presence of a point mass

We solve the Laplace equation $\Box h_{ij}=0$ describing the propagation of gravitational waves in an expanding background metric with a power law scale factor in the presence of a point mass in the weak field approximation (Newtonian McVittie background). We use boundary conditions at large distances from the mass corresponding to a standing spherical gravitational wave in an expanding background which is equivalent to a linear combination of an incoming and an outgoing propagating gravitational wave. We compare the solution with the corresponding solution in the absence of the point mass and show that the point mass increases the amplitude of the wave and also decreases its frequency (as observed by an observer at infinity) in accordance with gravitational time delay.

gr-qc↗

A Comparison of Thawing and Freezing Dark Energy Parametrizations

Dark energy equation of state $w(z)$ parametrizations with two parameters and given monotonicity are generically either convex or concave functions. This makes them suitable for fitting either freezing or thawing quintessence models but not both simultaneously. Fitting a dataset based on a freezing model with an unsuitable (concave when increasing) $w(z)$ parametrization (like CPL) can lead to significant misleading features like crossing of the phantom divide line, incorrect $w(z=0)$, incorrect slope \etc that are not present in the underlying cosmological model. To demonstrate this fact we generate scattered cosmological data both at the level of $w(z)$ and the luminosity distance $D_L(z)$ based on either thawing or freezing quintessence models and fit them using parametrizations of convex and of concave type. We then compare statistically significant features of the best fit $w(z)$ with actual features of the underlying model. We thus verify that the use of unsuitable parametrizations can lead to misleading conclusions. In order to avoid these problems it is important to either use both convex and concave parametrizations and select the one with the best $χ^2$ or use principal component analysis thus splitting the redshift range into independent bins. In the latter case however, significant information about the slope of $w(z)$ at high redshifts is lost. Finally, we propose a new family of parametrizations (nCPL) $w(z)=w_0+w_a (\frac{z}{1+z})^n$ which generalizes the CPL and interpolates between thawing and freezing parametrizations as the parameter $n$ increases to values larger than 1.

astro-ph.CO↗

Scalar-Tensor Quintessence with a linear potential: Avoiding the Big Crunch cosmic doomsday

All quintessence potentials that are either monotonic with negative interval or have a minimum at negative values of the potential, generically predict a future collapse of the scale factor to a "doomsday" singularity. We show that this doomsday is generically avoided in models with a proper non-minimal coupling of the quintessence scalar field to the curvature scalar $R$. For simplicity we consider linear quintessence potential $V=-sϕ$ and linear non-minimal coupling $F=1-λϕ$. However our result is generic and is due to the fact that the non-minimal coupling modifies the effective potential that determines the dynamics of the scalar field. Thus for each positive value of the parameter $s$ we find a critical value $λ_{crit}(s)$ such that for $λ>λ_{crit}(s)$ the negative potential energy does not dominate the universe and the cosmic doomsday Big Crunch singularity is avoided because the scalar field eventually rolls up its potential. We find that $λ_{crit}(s)$ increases approximately linearly with $s$. For $λ>λ_{crit}(s)$ the potential energy of the scalar field becomes positive and it eventually dominates while the dark energy equation of state parameter tends to $w=-1$ leading to a deSitter Universe.

gr-qc↗

Viable f(T) models are practically indistinguishable from LCDM

We investigate the cosmological predictions of several $f(T)$ models, with up to two parameters, at both the background and the perturbation levels. Using current cosmological observations (geometric supernovae type Ia, cosmic microwave background and baryonic acoustic oscillation and dynamical growth data) we impose constraints on the distortion parameter, which quantifies the deviation of these models from the concordance $Λ$ cosmology at the background level. In addition we constrain the growth index $γ$ predicted in the context of these models using the latest perturbation growth data in the context of three parametrizations for $γ$. The evolution of the best fit effective Newton constant, which incorporates the $f(T)$-gravity effects, is also obtained along with the corresponding $1σ$ error regions. We show that all the viable parameter sectors of the $f(T)$ gravity models considered practically reduce these models to $Λ$CDM. Thus, the degrees of freedom that open up to $Λ$CDM in the context of $f(T)$ gravity models are not utilized by the cosmological data leading to an overall disfavor of these models.

astro-ph.CO↗

Testing General Relativity Using the Evolution of Linear Bias

We investigate the cosmic evolution of the linear bias in the framework of a flat FLRW spacetime. We consider metric perturbations in the Newtonian gauge, including Hubble scale effects. Making the following assumptions, (i) scale independent current epoch bias $b_0$, (ii) equal accelerations between tracers and matter, (iii) unimportant halo merging effects (which is quite accurate for $z<3$), we analytically derive the scale dependent bias evolution. The identified scale dependence is only due to Hubble scale evolution GR effects, while other scale dependence contributions are ignored. We find that up to galaxy cluster scales the fluctuations of the metric do not introduce a significant scale dependence in the linear bias. Our bias evolution model is then used to derive a connection between the matter growth index $γ$ and the observable value of the tracer power spectrum normalization $σ_8(z)$. We show how this connection can be used as an observational test of General Relativity on extragalactic scales.

astro-ph.CO↗

LCDM: Triumphs, Puzzles and Remedies

The consistency level of LCDM with geometrical data probes has been increasing with time during the last decade. Despite of these successes, there are some puzzling conflicts between LCDM predictions and dynamical data probes (bulk flows, alignment and magnitude of low CMB multipoles, alignment of quasar optical polarization vectors, cluster halo profiles). Most of these puzzles are related to the existence of preferred anisotropy axes which appear to be unlikely close to each other. A few models that predict the existence of preferred cosmological axes are briefly discussed.

astro-ph.CO↗

Generalized LTB model with Inhomogeneous Isotropic Dark Energy: Observational Constraints

We consider on-center and off-center observers in an inhomogeneous, spherically symmetric, isocurvature (flat) concentration of dark energy with typical size of a few Gpc. Such a concentration could be produced e.g. by a recently formed global monopole with core size that approaches the Hubble scale. In this case we would have what may be called `topological quintessence' in analogy with the well-known topological inflation. We show that the minimum comoving radius r_{0min} of such a dark energy inhomogeneity that is consistent with the Union2 Type Ia supernovae (SnIa) data at the 3σlevel is r_{0min}\simeq 1.8 Gpc. As expected, the best-fit fractional dark energy density at the center, Ω_X,in, approaches the corresponding LCDM value Ω_X,in =0.73 for large enough values of the inhomogeneity radius r_0 (r_0 > 4Gpc). Using the Union2 data, we show that the maximum allowed shift r_{obs-max} of the observer from the center of the inhomogeneity is about 0.7 r_0 which respects the Copernican principle. The model naturally predicts the existence of a preferred axis and alignment of the low CMB multipoles. However, the constraints on r_{obs-max} coming from the magnitude of the CMB dipole remain a severe challenge to the Copernican principle and lead to r_{obs-max}< 110 Mpc even for an inhomogeneity radius as large as r_0=7 Gpc.

astro-ph.CO↗

Searching for a Cosmological Preferred Axis: Union2 Data Analysis and Comparison with Other Probes

We review, compare and extend recent studies searching for evidence for a preferred cosmological axis. We start from the Union2 SnIa dataset and use the hemisphere comparison method to search for a preferred axis in the data. We find that the hemisphere of maximum accelerating expansion rate is in the direction $(l,b)=({309^\circ}^{+23^\circ}_{-3^\circ}, {18^\circ}^{+11^\circ}_{-10^\circ})$ ($\omm=0.19$) while the hemisphere of minimum acceleration is in the opposite direction $(l,b)=({129^\circ}^{+23^\circ}_{-3^\circ},{-18^\circ}^{+10^\circ}_{-11^\circ})$ ($\omm=0.30$). The level of anisotropy is described by the normalized difference of the best fit values of $\omm$ between the two hemispheres in the context of \lcdm fits. We find a maximum anisotropy level in the Union2 data of $\frac{Δ\ommax}{\bomm}=0.43\pm 0.06$. Such a level does not necessarily correspond to statistically significant anisotropy because it is reproduced by about $30%$ of simulated isotropic data mimicking the best fit Union2 dataset. However, when combined with the axes directions of other cosmological observations (bulk velocity flow axis, three axes of CMB low multipole moments and quasar optical polarization alignment axis), the statistical evidence for a cosmological anisotropy increases dramatically. We estimate the probability that the above independent six axes directions would be so close in the sky to be less than $1%$. Thus either the relative coincidence of these six axes is a very large statistical fluctuation or there is an underlying physical or systematic reason that leads to their correlation.

astro-ph.CO↗

Consistency of LCDM with Geometric and Dynamical Probes

The LCDM cosmological model assumes the existence of a small cosmological constant in order to explain the observed accelerating cosmic expansion. Despite the dramatic improvement of the quality of cosmological data during the last decade it remains the simplest model that fits remarkably well (almost) all cosmological observations. In this talk I review the increasingly successful fits provided by LCDM on recent geometric probe data of the cosmic expansion. I also briefly discuss some emerging shortcomings of the model in attempting to fit specific classes of data (eg cosmic velocity dipole flows and cluster halo profiles). Finally, I summarize recent results on the theoretically predicted matter overdensity ($δ_m=\frac{δρ_m}{ρ_m}$) evolution (a dynamical probe of the cosmic expansion), emphasizing its scale and gauge dependence on large cosmological scales in the context of general relativity. A new scale dependent parametrization which describes accurately the growth rate of perturbations even on scales larger than 100h^{-1}Mpc is shown to be a straightforward generalization of the well known scale independent parametrization f(a)=\omms(a)^γvalid on smaller cosmological scales.

astro-ph.CO↗

Evolution of Dark Energy Perturbations in Scalar-Tensor Cosmologies

We solve analytically and numerically the generalized Einstein equations in scalar-tensor cosmologies to obtain the evolution of dark energy and matter linear perturbations. We compare our results with the corresponding results for minimally coupled quintessence perturbations. Our results for natural (O(1)) values of parameters in the Lagrangian which lead to a background expansion similar to LCDM are summarized as follows: 1. Scalar-Tensor dark energy density perturbations are amplified by a factor of about 10^6 compared to minimally coupled quintessence perturbations on scales less than about 100 h^{-1} Mpc. On these scales dark energy perturbations constitute a fraction of about 10% compared to matter density perturbations. 2. Scalar-Tensor dark energy density perturbations are anti-correlated with matter linear perturbations on sub-Hubble scales. Thus clusters of galaxies are predicted to overlap with voids of dark energy. 3. This anti-correlation of matter with negative pressure perturbations induces a mild amplification of matter perturbations by about 10% on sub-Hubble scales. 4. The evolution of scalar field perturbations on sub-Hubble scales, is scale independent and therefore it corresponds to a vanishing effective speed of sound (c_{sΦ}=0). It also involves large oscillations at early times induced by the amplified effective mass of the field. This amplification is due to the non-minimal coupling of the field to the Ricci curvature scalar and (thus) to matter. No such oscillations are present in minimally coupled quintessence perturbations which are suppressed on sub-Hubble scales (c_{sΦ}=1). Implications of our results include modified predictions for cluster halo profiles observed properties. These profiles are known to be in some tension with the predictions of LCDM.

astro-ph.CO↗

PPN Parameter $γ$ and Solar System Constraints of Massive Brans-Dicke Theories

Previous solar system constraints of the Brans-Dicke (BD) parameter $ω$ have either ignored the effects of the scalar field potential (mass terms) or assumed a highly massive scalar field. Here, we interpolate between the above two assumptions and derive the solar system constraints on the BD parameter $ω$ for {\it any} field mass. We show that for $ω=O(1)$ the solar system constraints relax for a field mass $m \gsim 20 \times m_{AU}= 20\times 10^{-27}GeV$.

gr-qc↗

Comparison of Recent SnIa datasets

We rank the six latest Type Ia supernova (SnIa) datasets (Constitution (C), Union (U), ESSENCE (Davis) (E), Gold06 (G), SNLS 1yr (S) and SDSS-II (D)) in the context of the Chevalier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) parametrization $w(a)=w_0+w_1 (1-a)$, according to their Figure of Merit (FoM), their consistency with the cosmological constant ($Λ$CDM), their consistency with standard rulers (Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO)) and their mutual consistency. We find a significant improvement of the FoM (defined as the inverse area of the 95.4% parameter contour) with the number of SnIa of these datasets ((C) highest FoM, (U), (G), (D), (E), (S) lowest FoM). Standard rulers (CMB+BAO) have a better FoM by about a factor of 3, compared to the highest FoM SnIa dataset (C). We also find that the ranking sequence based on consistency with $Λ$CDM is identical with the corresponding ranking based on consistency with standard rulers ((S) most consistent, (D), (C), (E), (U), (G) least consistent). The ranking sequence of the datasets however changes when we consider the consistency with an expansion history corresponding to evolving dark energy $(w_0,w_1)=(-1.4,2)$ crossing the phantom divide line $w=-1$ (it is practically reversed to (G), (U), (E), (S), (D), (C)). The SALT2 and MLCS2k2 fitters are also compared and some peculiar features of the SDSS-II dataset when standardized with the MLCS2k2 fitter are pointed out. Finally, we construct a statistic to estimate the internal consistency of a collection of SnIa datasets. We find that even though there is good consistency among most samples taken from the above datasets, this consistency decreases significantly when the Gold06 (G) dataset is included in the sample.

astro-ph.CO↗

Bright High z SnIa: A Challenge for LCDM?

It has recently been pointed out by Kowalski et. al. (arxiv:0804.4142) that there is `an unexpected brightness of the SnIa data at z>1'. We quantify this statement by constructing a new statistic which is applicable directly on the Type Ia Supernova (SnIa) distance moduli. This statistic is designed to pick up systematic brightness trends of SnIa datapoints with respect to a best fit cosmological model at high redshifts. It is based on binning the normalized differences between the SnIa distance moduli and the corresponding best fit values in the context of a specific cosmological model (eg LCDM). We then focus on the highest redshift bin and extend its size towards lower redshifts until the Binned Normalized Difference (BND) changes sign (crosses 0) at a redshift z_c (bin size N_c). The bin size N_c of this crossing (the statistical variable) is then compared with the corresponding crossing bin size N_{mc} for Monte Carlo data realizations based on the best fit model. We find that the crossing bin size N_c obtained from the Union08 and Gold06 data with respect to the best fit LCDM model is anomalously large compared to N_{mc} of the corresponding Monte Carlo datasets obtained from the best fit LCDM in each case. In particular, only 2.2% of the Monte Carlo LCDM datasets are consistent with the Gold06 value of N_c while the corresponding probability for the Union08 value of N_c is 5.3%. Thus, according to this statistic, the probability that the high redshift brightness bias of the Union08 and Gold06 datasets is realized in the context of a (w_0,w_1)=(-1,0) model (LCDM cosmology) is less than 6%. The corresponding realization probability in the context of a (w_0,w_1)=(-1.4,2) model is more than 30% for both the Union08 and the Gold06 datasets.

astro-ph↗

Kink-Antikink Formation from an Oscillation Mode by Sudden Distortion of the Evolution Potential

We demonstrate numerically that an oscillation mode in 1+1 dimensions (eg a breather or an oscillon) can decay into a kink-antikink pair by a sudden distortion of the evolution potential which occurs within a certain time or space domain. In particular, we consider the transition of a sine-Gordon potential into a Φ^4 potential. The breather field configuration is assumed to initially evolve in a sine-Gordon potential with velocity $v$ and oscillation frequency $ω$. We then consider two types of numerical experiments: a. An abrupt transition of the potential to a $Φ^4$ form at t_0=0 over the whole 1-dimensional lattice and b. The impact of the breather on a region x>x_0=0 where the potential has the Φ^4 form which is different from the sine-Gordon form valid at x<x_0=0. We find that in both cases there is a region of parameters (v,ω) such that the breather decays to a kink-antikink pair. This region of parameters for kink-antikink formation is qualitatively similar with the parameter region where the energy of the breather exceeds the energy of the kink-antikink pair in the Φ^4 potential. We demonstrate that the same mechanism for soliton formation is realized when using a gaussian oscillator (oscillon) instead of a breather. We briefly discuss the implications of our results for realistic experiments as well as their extension to soliton formation in two and three space dimensions.

hep-ph↗

Six Puzzles for LCDM Cosmology

The LCDM cosmological model is a well defined, simple and predictive model which is consistent with the majority of current cosmological observations. Despite of these successes there are specific cosmological observations which differ from the predictions of LCDM at a level of 2σor higher. These observations include the following: 1. Large Scale Velocity Flows (LCDM predicts significantly smaller amplitude and scale of flows than what observations indicate), 2. Brightness of Type Ia Supernovae (SnIa) at High Redshift z (LCDM predicts fainter SnIa at High z), 3. Emptiness of Voids (LCDM predicts more dwarf or irregular galaxies in voids than observed), 4. Profiles of Cluster Haloes (LCDM predicts shallow low concentration and density profiles in contrast to observations which indicate denser high concentration cluster haloes) 5. Profiles of Galaxy Haloes (LCDM predicts halo mass profiles with cuspy cores and low outer density while lensing and dynamical observations indicate a central core of constant density and a flattish high dark mass density outer profile), 6. Sizable Population of Disk Galaxies (LCDM predicts a smaller fraction of disk galaxies due to recent mergers expected to disrupt cold rotationally supported disks). Even though the origin of some of the above challenges may be astrophysical or related to dark matter properties, it should be stressed that even on galactic and cluster scales, the effects of dark energy on the equilibrium and stability of astrophysical systems are not negligible and they may play a key role in the resolution of the above puzzles. Here, I briefly review these six challenges of LCDM and discuss the possible dark energy properties required for their resolution.

astro-ph↗

Testing GRBs as Standard Candles

Several correlations among Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) observables with available redshifts have been recently identified. Proper evaluation and calibration of these correlations may facilitate the use of GRBs as standard candles constraining the expansion history of the universe up to redshifts of $z>6$. Here we use the 69 GRB dataset recently compiled by Schaefer (astro-ph/0612285) and we test the calibration of five of the above correlations ($1:\epkk-E_γ$, $2:\epkk-L$, $3:\tlag-L$, $4:V-L$, $5:\trt-L$) with respect to two potential sources of systematics: Evolution with redshift and cosmological model used in the calibration. In examining the model dependence we assume flat \lcdm and vary $\omm$. Our approach avoids the circularity problem of previous studies since we do not fix $\omm$ to find the correlation parameters. Instead we simultaneously minimize $χ^2$ with respect to both the log-linear correlation parameters $a$, $b$ and the cosmological parameter $\omm$. We find no statistically significant evidence for redshift dependence of $a$ and $b$ in any of the correlation relations tested. We also find that one of the five correlation relations tested ($\epkk-E_γ$) has a significantly lower intrinsic dispersion compared to the other correlations. For this correlation relation, the maximum likelihood method favors the existence of a cosmological constant while the other four correlation favor a flat matter dominated universe $\omm \simeq 1$. Finally, a cross-correlation analysis between the GRBs and SnIa data for various values of $\omm$ has shown that the $E_{peak}-E_γ$ relation traces well the SnIa redshift regime. However, even the tightest correlation relation ($E_{peak}-E_γ$) provides much weaker constraints on $\omm$ than current SnIa data.

astro-ph↗

Is the CMB shift parameter connected with the growth of cosmological perturbations?

We verify numerically that in the context of general relativity (GR), flat models which have the same $Ω_{\rm m}$ and CMB shift parameter $R$ but different $H(a)$ and $w(a)$ also have very similar (within less than 8%) growth of perturbations even though the dark energy density evolution is quite different. This provides a direct connection between geometrical and dynamical tests of dark energy and may be used as a cosmological test of general relativity.

astro-ph↗