arXiv subjects

Lamia Salsabil

Publications and source records attributed to Lamia Salsabil.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

URL Extraction from Scholarly Documents: A Cross-Format Comparative Analysis

URLs in scholarly documents link to rich external resources such as datasets, software, publications, and websites. Extracting these URLs is crucial in the data preparation stage of many downstream tasks, such as link rot analysis, web crawling, and building knowledge graphs. However, existing studies often downplay this phase, simply extracting URLs from a single format, usually text directly converted from PDFs. We present a systematic study evaluating URL extraction across six input formats (text with annotation layer, LaTeX, HTML, XML, Markdown, and PNG converted from PDF). To support the evaluation, we compiled a benchmark dataset consisting of 2,338 manually annotated URLs from 200 arXiv papers spanning a wide range of domains over a 33-year period. In addition to evaluating individual file formats, we also compared 63 composite input-format combinations. Our extensive evaluations indicate that TEXTWAL achieves the best performance among single-format inputs, while TEXTWAL+LaTeX achieves the best overall URL extraction performance. The same trend is observed for URLs linking to open-access datasets and software. To further validate these findings, we apply our format-specific URL extraction pipelines to a longitudinal random sample of 364,744 arXiv papers spanning 33 years. We observe a sharp increase in URL density after 2015, along with remarkable differences in URL extraction across file formats over time. Overall, our study highlights the importance of selecting an appropriate format for URL extraction from scholarly documents. The dataset and code are publicly available at: https://github.com/lamps-lab/arxiv-url-bench .

cs.DL↗

arXiv2025

Toward Robust URL Extraction for Open Science: A Study of arXiv File Formats and Temporal Trends

In this work, we study how URL extraction results depend on input format. We compiled a pilot dataset by extracting URLs from 10 arXiv papers and used the same heuristic method to extract URLs from four formats derived from the PDF files or the source LaTeX files. We found that accurate and complete URL extraction from any single format or a combination of multiple formats is challenging, with the best F1-score of 0.71. Using the pilot dataset, we evaluate extraction performance across formats and show that structured formats like HTML and XML produce more accurate results than PDFs or Text. Combining multiple formats improves coverage, especially when targeting research-critical resources. We further apply URL extraction on two tasks, namely classifying URLs into open-access datasets and software and the others, and analyzing the trend of URLs usage in arXiv papers from 1992 to 2024. These results suggest that using a combination of multiple formats achieves better performance on URL extraction than a single format, and the number of URLs in arXiv papers has been steadily increasing since 1992 to 2014 and has been drastically increasing from 2014 to 2024. The dataset and the Jupyter notebooks used for the preliminary analysis are publicly available at https://github.com/lamps-lab/arxiv-urls

cs.DL↗

arXiv2023

ETDPC: A Multimodality Framework for Classifying Pages in Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) have been proposed, advocated, and generated for more than 25 years. Although ETDs are hosted by commercial or institutional digital library repositories, they are still an understudied type of scholarly big data, partially because they are usually longer than conference proceedings and journals. Segmenting ETDs will allow researchers to study sectional content. Readers can navigate to particular pages of interest, discover, and explore the content buried in these long documents. Most existing frameworks on document page classification are designed for classifying general documents and perform poorly on ETDs. In this paper, we propose ETDPC. Its backbone is a two-stream multimodal model with a cross-attention network to classify ETD pages into 13 categories. To overcome the challenge of imbalanced labeled samples, we augmented data for minority categories and employed a hierarchical classifier. ETDPC outperforms the state-of-the-art models in all categories, achieving an F1 of 0.84 -- 0.96 for 9 out of 13 categories. We also demonstrated its data efficiency. The code and data can be found on GitHub (https://github.com/lamps-lab/ETDMiner/tree/master/etd_segmentation).

cs.CV↗

arXiv2023

It's Not Just GitHub: Identifying Data and Software Sources Included in Publications

Paper publications are no longer the only form of research product. Due to recent initiatives by publication venues and funding institutions, open access datasets and software products are increasingly considered research products and URIs to these products are growing more prevalent in scholarly publications. However, as with all URIs, resources found on the live Web are not permanent. Archivists and institutions including Software Heritage, Internet Archive, and Zenodo are working to preserve data and software products as valuable parts of reproducibility, a cornerstone of scientific research. While some hosting platforms are well-known and can be identified with regular expressions, there are a vast number of smaller, more niche hosting platforms utilized by researchers to host their data and software. If it is not feasible to manually identify all hosting platforms used by researchers, how can we identify URIs to open-access data and software (OADS) to aid in their preservation? We used a hybrid classifier to classify URIs as OADS URIs and non-OADS URIs. We found that URIs to Git hosting platforms (GHPs) including GitHub, GitLab, SourceForge, and Bitbucket accounted for 33\% of OADS URIs. Non-GHP OADS URIs are distributed across almost 50,000 unique hostnames. We determined that using a hybrid classifier allows for the identification of OADS URIs in less common hosting platforms which can benefit discoverability for preserving datasets and software products as research products for reproducibility.

cs.DL↗

arXiv2023

MetaEnhance: Metadata Quality Improvement for Electronic Theses and Dissertations of University Libraries

Metadata quality is crucial for digital objects to be discovered through digital library interfaces. However, due to various reasons, the metadata of digital objects often exhibits incomplete, inconsistent, and incorrect values. We investigate methods to automatically detect, correct, and canonicalize scholarly metadata, using seven key fields of electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) as a case study. We propose MetaEnhance, a framework that utilizes state-of-the-art artificial intelligence methods to improve the quality of these fields. To evaluate MetaEnhance, we compiled a metadata quality evaluation benchmark containing 500 ETDs, by combining subsets sampled using multiple criteria. We tested MetaEnhance on this benchmark and found that the proposed methods achieved nearly perfect F1-scores in detecting errors and F1-scores in correcting errors ranging from 0.85 to 1.00 for five of seven fields.

cs.DL↗