arXiv subjects

Laura Ibáñez-Martínez

Publications and source records attributed to Laura Ibáñez-Martínez.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Ghost in the Encoder: Decodable Artist Identity Representations in Lyrics-to-Song Generation

Text-to-song generation models can be prompted to imitate specific artists or regurgitate entire songs from their training data. Although these phenomena have been documented behaviorally on small datasets, little is known about the internal representations that may give rise to them. Prior interpretability work on generative audio has focused on locating semantic concepts such as genre or time signature within model activations. In this work, we show that a trained model can be probed for linearly decodable representations of artist identity from song lyrics alone, without any additional identifiers. Through a controlled case study of ACE-Step 1.5 spanning 2,000 songs across 100 artists, we demonstrate that the artist associated with a given set of lyrics can be identified within the model's internal activations, and that this conditioning signal propagates from the lyric encoder to the diffusion backbone during inference. These findings indicate that lyrics constitute an artist-level conditioning channel not addressed by prompt-side replication safeguards. More broadly, our work highlights how latent-space analysis can be used to audit what generative music models have implicitly learned from their training data.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2026

MusGU+: Toward a Musician-Centered Evaluation Framework and Discovery Tool for Generative Music AI

Generative music systems are increasingly presented as tools that democratize music creation, yet their practical suitability for musicians remains underexplored. Prior work includes openness-focused evaluation frameworks, such as MusGO (Music-Generative Open AI), as well as qualitative studies of musicians' experiences with generative systems. However, these approaches do not support systematic comparison or early-stage discovery of models for creative use. Motivated by such limitations, we introduce MusGU+, a musician-centered evaluation framework organized around three dimensions: Adaptability, Usability, and Controllability. Together, these capture whether a model can be feasibly trained or fine-tuned on personal data, integrated into real-world music workflows, and controlled in musically meaningful ways. We evaluate 10 representative generative music systems and present an interactive discovery tool that enables musicians to explore and filter models according to these criteria. While MusGO remains valuable for promoting responsible research practices, MusGU+ supports informed selection and practical adoption of generative systems by musicians.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2026

Evaluating Disentangled Representations for Controllable Music Generation

Recent approaches in music generation rely on disentangled representations, often labeled as structure and timbre or local and global, to enable controllable synthesis. Yet the underlying properties of these embeddings remain underexplored. In this work, we evaluate such disentangled representations in a set of music audio models for controllable generation using a probing-based framework that goes beyond standard downstream tasks. The selected models reflect diverse unsupervised disentanglement strategies, including inductive biases, data augmentations, adversarial objectives, and staged training procedures. We further isolate specific strategies to analyze their effect. Our analysis spans four key axes: informativeness, equivariance, invariance, and disentanglement, which are assessed across datasets, tasks, and controlled transformations. Our findings reveal inconsistencies between intended and actual semantics of the embeddings, suggesting that current strategies fall short of producing truly disentangled representations, and prompting a re-examination of how controllability is approached in music generation.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2025

MusGO: A Community-Driven Framework For Assessing Openness in Music-Generative AI

Since 2023, generative AI has rapidly advanced in the music domain. Despite significant technological advancements, music-generative models raise critical ethical challenges, including a lack of transparency and accountability, along with risks such as the replication of artists' works, which highlights the importance of fostering openness. With upcoming regulations such as the EU AI Act encouraging open models, many generative models are being released labelled as 'open'. However, the definition of an open model remains widely debated. In this article, we adapt a recently proposed evidence-based framework for assessing openness in LLMs to the music domain. Using feedback from a survey of 110 participants from the Music Information Retrieval (MIR) community, we refine the framework into MusGO (Music-Generative Open AI), which comprises 13 openness categories: 8 essential and 5 desirable. We evaluate 16 state-of-the-art generative models and provide an openness leaderboard that is fully open to public scrutiny and community contributions. Through this work, we aim to clarify the concept of openness in music-generative AI and promote its transparent and responsible development.

cs.SD↗