arXiv subjects

Lawrence Swaminathan Xavier Prince

Publications and source records attributed to Lawrence Swaminathan Xavier Prince.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Finding Common Ground: Graded Communal Knowledge in Bluesky Starter Packs

Communication is made possible by common ground---the unspoken knowledge that people share and presuppose of one another, whether that be online or offline. In his conception of common ground, Clark (1996) distinguishes between personal and communal common ground, and asserts that the latter is graded: the more community affiliations two people share, the more common ground they share as well. Social media research has invoked this mechanism to explain how users connect, but it has gone largely untested because community memberships are rarely visible and, where they are, they are coupled to user interactions in a way that leads to conflating effects. To circumvent these challenges, this study repurposes Bluesky starter packs (SPs) as user-curated community affiliation labels. Across 191,648 pairs of users, we show that shared lexical repertoire---our proxy for common ground---grows monotonically with the number of SPs that users share, with users sharing a single pack being roughly twice as similar as equally connected strangers. A semantic renormalization of SP co-membership shows furthermore that it is more so the number of topically \emph{distinct} communities, rather than the raw count, in which common ground is graded. Finally, we show that community co-membership adds to common ground independently of proximity in the Bluesky follow network. These results lead to the conclusion that community membership is a measurable, separable, and semantically structured carrier of common ground. Reading it as such makes common ground observable before an exchange rather than inferred from it, and thus opens the door for large-scale observational approaches to a set of questions that have so far only been posed in the laboratory.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2026

A Dialogue-Based Framework for Correcting Multimodal Errors in AI-Assisted STEM Education

Large Language Models (LLMs) are democratizing access to personalized tutoring; however, their effectiveness is hindered by challenges in processing multimodal content, which limits AI's potential to provide equitable, high-quality STEM support. This study evaluates LLM performance on multimodal physics problems, identifies specific failure modes through an empirical error taxonomy, and tests practical interventions designed to overcome multimodal processing limitations. We assessed three publicly available LLMs (Claude, Gemini, and ChatGPT) on multimodal physics problems from the OpenStax database and compared the results with text-only performance. An empirically derived error taxonomy was developed through pilot testing, followed by evaluation of a structured multimodal dialogue intervention. All three models achieved near-ceiling accuracy (96%) on text-only physics problems. Performance declined substantially on multimodal problems, consistent with what we term the Multimodal Interference Effect. Error analysis identified four failure modes: visual processing errors, context misinterpretation, mathematical computational errors, and hybrid errors, with visual processing errors being the most prevalent. The structured dialogue intervention corrected 82% of errors overall; visual processing errors were corrected at 100% across all models. Educators and students can implement these interventions immediately, requiring no model retraining, to improve AI tutoring reliability on image-rich STEM content, advancing equitable access to high-quality learning support.

physics.ed-ph↗

arXiv2026

Analyzing VLM-Based Approaches for Anomaly Classification and Segmentation

Vision-Language Models (VLMs), particularly CLIP, have revolutionized anomaly detection by enabling zero-shot and few-shot defect identification without extensive labeled datasets. By learning aligned representations of images and text, VLMs facilitate anomaly classification and segmentation through natural language descriptions of normal and abnormal states, eliminating traditional requirements for task-specific training or defect examples. This project presents a comprehensive analysis of VLM-based approaches for anomaly classification (AC) and anomaly segmentation (AS). We systematically investigate key architectural paradigms including sliding window-based dense feature extraction (WinCLIP), multi-stage feature alignment with learnable projections (AprilLab framework), and compositional prompt ensemble strategies. Our analysis evaluates these methods across critical dimensions: feature extraction mechanisms, text-visual alignment strategies, prompt engineering techniques, zero-shot versus few-shot trade-offs, computational efficiency, and cross-domain generalization. Through rigorous experimentation on benchmarks such as MVTec AD and VisA, we compare classification accuracy, segmentation precision, and inference efficiency. The primary contribution is a foundational understanding of how and why VLMs succeed in anomaly detection, synthesizing practical insights for method selection and identifying current limitations. This work aims to facilitate informed adoption of VLM-based methods in industrial quality control and guide future research directions.

cs.CV↗