SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Leon Kullmann

Publications and source records attributed to Leon Kullmann.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Designing Caterpillars for Graphs: Approximation and Hardness

The classical Minimum Linear Arrangement (MLA) problem has been studied extensively. It is known to be NP-hard and it admits an $O(\sqrt{\log n}\log\log n)$-approximation [Feige and Lee, IPL, 2007]. MLA can be defined as follows as design problem: Given a graph $G$ with vertex set $V(G)$, design a path $H$ on the same vertex set that minimizes the linear arrangement cost $\sum_{uv\in E(G)}\textrm{dist}_H(u,v)$, where $\textrm{dist}_H(u,v)$ indicates the distance of $u$ and $v$ in $H$. We initiate the study of the generalization in which $H$ is allowed to be a caterpillar graph of maximum degree at most $\Delta$. Caterpillars are the simplest generalization of paths, having pathwidth one and interpolating between paths and stars via the degree parameter $\Delta$. We give an algorithm that lifts any $\alpha$-approximation for MLA to an $(\alpha+3-2/(\Delta-1))$-approximation for our problem, thus obtaining an $O(\sqrt{\log n}\log\log n)$-approximation for our more general problem as well. Moreover, we derive a $4$-approximation whenever MLA is polynomial-time solvable, in particular, for trees. Complementing these results, we prove NP-hardness for every constant $\Delta\geq 2$, and, in stark contrast to MLA, show it remains NP-hard on trees when $\Delta$ is part of the input.

cs.DS

Symmetric Proofs in the Ideal Proof System

We consider the Ideal Proof System (IPS) introduced by Grochow and Pitassi and pose the question of which tautologies admit symmetric proofs, and of what complexity. The symmetry requirement in proofs is inspired by recent work establishing lower bounds in other symmetric models of computation. We link the existence of symmetric IPS proofs to the expressive power of logics such as fixed-point logic with counting and Choiceless Polynomial Time, specifically regarding the graph isomorphism problem. We identify relationships and tradeoffs between the symmetry of proofs and other parameters of IPS proofs such as size, degree and linearity. We study these on a number of standard families of tautologies from proof complexity and finite model theory such as the pigeonhole principle, the subset sum problem and the Cai-F\"urer-Immerman graphs, exhibiting non-trivial upper bounds on the size of symmetric IPS proofs.

cs.LO