SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Leon Wehrhan

Publications and source records attributed to Leon Wehrhan.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials: Advancing Open-Source Software for Efficient and Scalable Molecular Simulation

Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) enable atomistic simulations with near ab initio accuracy at significantly reduced computational cost, but their broader adoption is often limited by fragmented tooling, limited scalability, and inflexible software design. We present mlip v2, a new generation of the mlip library that advances efficient and scalable molecular simulation through a unified and extensible framework. The new release features a targeted API redesign with improved modularity and control, enabling flexible customization of training, data processing, and simulation workflows. It further integrates a new high-performance backend for equivariant operations, e3j, significantly accelerating model inference and simulations. In addition, the framework introduces a range of entirely new capabilities, including the eSEN architecture with a Mixture-of-Experts formulation for scalable training on large and diverse datasets, improved handling of electrostatics through more physically grounded charge modeling and long-range interaction treatment, and advanced simulation features such as NPT ensembles and nudged elastic band methods. Together, these extensions significantly broaden the scope of MLIP applications, enabling efficient modeling of complex, reactive, and out-of-equilibrium systems, and bridging the gap between ML research and practical molecular simulation applications. The library is available on GitHub and on PyPI under the Apache license 2.0.

physics.chem-ph

MLIPAudit: A benchmarking tool for Machine Learned Interatomic Potentials

Machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) promise to significantly advance atomistic simulations by delivering quantum-level accuracy for large molecular systems at a fraction of the computational cost of traditional electronic structure methods. While model hubs and categorisation efforts have emerged in recent years, it remains difficult to consistently discover, compare, and apply these models across diverse scenarios. The field still lacks a standardised and comprehensive framework for evaluating MLIP performance. We introduce MLIPAudit, an open, curated and modular benchmarking suite designed to assess the accuracy of MLIP models across a variety of application tasks. MLIPAudit offers a diverse collection of benchmark systems, including small organic compounds, molecular liquids, proteins and flexible peptides, along with pre-computed results for a range of pre-trained and published models. MLIPAudit also provides tools for users to evaluate their models using the same standardised pipeline. A continuously updated leaderboard tracks performance across benchmarks, enabling direct comparison on downstream tasks. By providing a unified, transparent reference framework for model validation and comparison, MLIPAudit aims to foster reproducibility, transparency, and community-driven progress in the development of MLIPs for complex molecular systems. In order to illustrate the use of the library, we present some benchmarks run on a series of internal models, along with publicly available ones (UMA-Small, MACE-OFF, MACE-MP). The library is available on GitHub at https://github.com/instadeepai/mlipaudit, on PyPI at https://pypi.org/project/mlipaudit/ under the Apache License 2.0, and the leaderboard can be accessed on HuggingFace at https://huggingface.co/spaces/InstaDeepAI/mlipaudit-leaderboard.

physics.chem-ph