SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Lev Gordeev

Publications and source records attributed to Lev Gordeev.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

A note on Jerabek's paper "A simplified lower bound for implicational logic"

In our previous papers we sketched proofs of the equality NP = coNP = PSPACE. These results have been obtained by proof theoretic tree-to-dag compressing techniques adapted to Prawitz's Natural Deduction (ND) for implicational minimal logic with references to Hudelmaier's cutfree sequent calculus. In this note we comment on Je\v{r}\'{a}bek's approach that claimed to refute our results by providing exponential lower bounds on the implicational minimal logic. This claim is wrong and misleading, which is briefly demonstrated by Basis example below.

cs.CC

Predicative proof theory of PDL and basic applications

Propositional dynamic logic (PDL) is presented in Schütte-style mode as one-sided semiformal tree-like sequent calculus Seq$_ω^{\text{pdl}}$ with standard cut rule and the omega-rule with principal formulas $\left[ P^{\ast }\right] \!A$. The omega-rule-free derivations in Seq$_{ω}^{\text{pdl}}$ are finite (trees) and sequents deducible by these finite derivations are valid in PDL. Moreover the cut-elimination theorem for Seq$_ω^{\text{pdl}}$ is provable in Peano Arithmetic (PA)extended by transfinite induction up to Veblen's ordinal $φ_ω\left( 0\right) $. Hence (by the cutfree subformula property) such predicative extension of PA proves that any given $\left[ P^{\ast }\right] $-free sequent is valid in PDL iff it is deducible in Seq$_ω^{\text{pdl}}$ by a finite cut- and omega-rule-free derivation, while PDL-validity of arbitrary star-free sequents is decidable in polynomial space. The former also implies standard Herbrand-style conclusions, which eventually leads to PSPACE-decidability of PDL-validity of $S$, provided that $P$ is atomic and $A$ is in a suitable \emph{basic conjunctive normal form}. Furthermore we consider star-free formulas $A$ in dual \emph{basic disjunctive normal form}, and corresponding expansions $S=\left\langle P^{\ast }\right\rangle \!A\vee Z$ whose PDL-validity problem is known to be EXPTIME-complete. We show that cutfree-derivability in Seq$_ω^{\text{pdl}}$ (hence PDL-validity) of such $S$\ is equivalent to plain validity of a suitable "transparent" quantified boolean formula $\widehat{S}$. The whole proof can be formalized in PA extended by transfinite induction along $φ_ω\left( 0\right)$ -- actually in the corresponding primitive recursive weakening, $\mathbf{PRA}_{φ_{ω}\left( 0\right)}$.

cs.LO

On P Versus NP

It is shown that graph-theoretic problem CLIQUE can't be solved in polynomial time by any deterministic TM. This upgrades the well-known partial result that claims only monotone unsolvability thereof, and eventually implies P $\neq$ NP as CLIQUE is NP-complete. This paper essentially simplifies my previous presentation that used more complex models of computation based on standard Boolean semantics while fixing technical errors spotted by a generic proof assistant Isabelle that has been implemented by Ren\'e Thiemann.

cs.CC