Leyla Roksan Caglar | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Same Compression Principle, Different Geometry: Rate-Distortion Signatures Dissociate Biological and Artificial Visual Systems

Efficient coding theory predicts that biological perceptual systems compress sensory input optimally under resource constraints, with the systematic structure of errors reflecting the geometry of that compression. Here we operationalize this principle using rate-distortion theory (RDT) to characterize how any system - biological or artificial - trades representational fidelity for informational efficiency. Treating stimulus-response behavior as an effective communication channel, we infer rate-distortion (RD) frontiers directly from confusion matrices and summarize each system with three geometric signatures: slope (beta), curvature (kappa), and area under the RD curve (AUC), capturing the marginal cost, abruptness, and overall efficiency of the accuracy-compression trade-off respectively. Applying this framework to human psychophysical data and 18 deep vision models across 12 families of controlled image perturbations at graded severities, we find that both biological and artificial systems follow a common lossy-compression principle but occupy systematically different regions of RD space. Humans exhibit smooth, flexible trade-offs characteristic of near-optimal efficient coding, while deep networks operate in steeper, more brittle regimes even at matched accuracy, with geometry dissociable from performance across training regimes. Critically, behavioral RD signatures track internal representational geometry, evidenced by the behaviorally inferred compression structure correlating with internal representational dissimilarity across all models. These results establish RD geometry as a compact diagnostic of perceptual compression strategy that recovers mechanistically interpretable structure in internal representations from behavioral input alone and extends naturally to the direct characterization of compression geometry in neural population activity.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Directional Confusions Reveal Divergent Inductive Biases Through Rate-Distortion Geometry in Human and Machine Vision

To humans, a robin seems more like a bird than a bird seems like a robin, but does this asymmetry also hold for machine vision? Humans and modern vision models can match each other in accuracy while making systematically different kinds of errors, differing not in how often they fail, but in who gets mistaken for whom. We show these directional confusions reveal distinct inductive biases invisible to accuracy alone. Using matched human and deep neural network responses on a natural-image categorization task under 12 perturbation types, we quantify asymmetry in confusion matrices and link its organization to the geometry of the information--error trade-off - how efficiently, and how gracefully, a system generalizes under distortion. We find that humans exhibit broad but weak asymmetries across many class pairs, whereas deep vision models show sparser, stronger directional collapses into a few dominant categories. Robustness training reduces overall asymmetry magnitude but fails to recover this human-like distributed structure. Generative simulations further show that these two asymmetry organizations shift the trade-off geometry in opposite directions even at matched accuracy, explaining why the same scalar asymmetry score can reflect fundamentally different generalization strategies. Together, these results establish directional confusion structure as a sensitive, interpretable signature of inductive bias that accuracy-based evaluation cannot recover.

cs.CV↗