arXiv subjects

Liangying Yin

Publications and source records attributed to Liangying Yin.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2021

Analysis of genetic differences between psychiatric disorders: Exploring pathways and cell-types/tissues involved and ability to differentiate the disorders by polygenic scores

Although displaying genetic correlations, psychiatric disorders are clinically defined as categorical entities as they each have distinguishing clinical features and may involve different treatments. Identifying differential genetic variations between these disorders may reveal how the disorders differ biologically and help to guide more personalized treatment. Here we presented a comprehensive analysis to identify genetic markers differentially associated with various psychiatric disorders/traits based on GWAS summary statistics, covering 18 psychiatric traits/disorders and 26 comparisons. We also conducted comprehensive analysis to unravel the genes, pathways and SNP functional categories involved, and the cell types and tissues implicated. We also assessed how well one could distinguish between psychiatric disorders by polygenic risk scores (PRS). SNP-based heritabilities (h2SNP) were significantly larger than zero for most comparisons. Based on current GWAS data, PRS have mostly modest power to distinguish between psychiatric disorders. For example, we estimated that AUC for distinguishing schizophrenia from major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder (BPD) from MDD and schizophrenia from BPD were 0.694, 0.602 and 0.618 respectively, while the maximum AUC (based on h2SNP) were 0.763, 0.749 and 0.726 respectively. We also uncovered differences in each pair of studied traits in terms of their differences in genetic correlation with comorbid traits. For example, clinically-defined MDD appeared to more strongly genetically correlated with other psychiatric disorders and heart disease, when compared to non-clinically-defined depression in UK Biobank. Our findings highlight genetic differences between psychiatric disorders and the mechanisms involved. PRS may aid differential diagnosis of selected psychiatric disorders in the future with larger GWAS samples.

q-bio.GN↗

arXiv2020

A framework to decipher the genetic architecture of combinations of complex diseases: applications in cardiovascular medicine

Genome-wide association studies(GWAS) have proven to be highly useful in revealing the genetic basis of complex diseases. At present, most GWAS are studies of a particular single disease diagnosis against controls. However, in practice, an individual is often affected by more than one condition/disorder. For example, patients with coronary artery disease(CAD) are often comorbid with diabetes mellitus(DM). Along a similar line, it is often clinically meaningful to study patients with one disease but without a comorbidity. For example, obese DM may have different pathophysiology from non-obese DM. Here we developed a statistical framework to uncover susceptibility variants for comorbid disorders (or a disorder without comorbidity), using GWAS summary statistics only. In essence, we mimicked a case-control GWAS in which the cases are affected with comorbidities or a disease without a relevant comorbid condition (in either case, we may consider the cases as those affected by a specific subtype of disease, as characterized by the presence or absence of comorbid conditions). We extended our methodology to deal with continuous traits with clinically meaningful categories (e.g. lipids). In addition, we illustrated how the analytic framework may be extended to more than two traits. We verified the feasibility and validity of our method by applying it to simulated scenarios and four cardiometabolic (CM) traits. We also analyzed the genes, pathways, cell-types/tissues involved in CM disease subtypes. LD-score regression analysis revealed some subtypes may indeed be biologically distinct with low genetic correlations. Further Mendelian randomization analysis found differential causal effects of different subtypes to relevant complications. We believe the findings are of both scientific and clinical value, and the proposed method may open a new avenue to analyzing GWAS data.

q-bio.GN↗