arXiv subjects

Lily M. Turkstra

Publications and source records attributed to Lily M. Turkstra.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Evaluating Closed-Loop EEG Feedback for Simulated Prosthetic Vision in Immersive VR: A Sham-Controlled Feasibility Study

Visual prostheses require users to interpret sparse and distorted artificial percepts through active visual search. We developed an EEG-guided neuroadaptive training platform for simulated prosthetic vision in immersive virtual reality and evaluated its feasibility in a sham-controlled object-localization task. Twenty-two sighted participants searched a virtual desk scene rendered through a low-resolution phosphene simulation while EEG was recorded using a dry-electrode headset integrated with a head-mounted display. During training, participants received post-trial visual feedback based either on a commonly used EEG engagement index, $β/(α+θ)$, or on visually matched non-contingent sham values. Both groups showed comparable within-session improvements in localization performance, consistent with practice, increasing familiarity with the simulated percepts, or refinement of search strategies. EEG-contingent feedback did not produce reliable group-level benefits in localization accuracy, completion time, workload, or modulation of the targeted index. Exploratory analyses showed substantial individual variability, but did not establish a feedback-specific relationship between the engagement index and behavioral performance. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of integrating EEG-contingent feedback with immersive simulated prosthetic vision, while identifying important limitations of the EEG measure, single-session training protocol, and post-trial feedback design.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Actionable Guidance Outperforms Map and Compass Cues in Demanding Immersive VR Wayfinding

Navigation aids are central to immersive virtual reality (VR) experiences that involve physical locomotion. Their effectiveness depends not only on how much spatial information they provide, but also on how directly that information supports movement decisions. We compared three common guidance techniques for immersive VR wayfinding: a directional arrow, a minimap, and a compass. In a controlled room-scale VR study with 42 participants completing 1008 trials, participants navigated to target landmarks in a time-pressured maze with reduced visibility and forced route replanning. Across behavioral and eye-tracking measures, arrow guidance produced the strongest navigation performance, minimap guidance yielded intermediate performance, and compass cues performed worst, suggesting that during immersive locomotion users benefit from guidance that can be interpreted rapidly while moving. These results suggest that in demanding immersive locomotion tasks, interfaces that translate spatial information directly into actionable movement cues can outperform richer but more interpretive spatial representations. Our findings highlight the importance of designing XR navigation interfaces that minimize the cognitive translation between spatial information and movement decisions.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Assistive technology use in domestic activities by people who are blind

People who are blind employ unique strategies when performing instrumental activities of daily living (iADLs), often relying on multiple sensory modalities and assistive technologies. While prior research has extensively explored adaptive strategies for outdoor activities like wayfinding and navigation, less emphasis has been placed on the information needs and problem-solving strategies for managing domestic activities. To address this gap, our study presents insights from 16 semi-structured interviews with individuals who are either legally or completely blind, highlighting both the current use and potential future applications of technologies for home-based iADLs. Our findings reveal several underexplored challenges, including the difficulty of locating misplaced objects, a structured problem-solving approach where digital tools are a last resort, and limited awareness of assistive training programs. Participants also faced persistent usability barriers as software updates disrupted accessibility features. Participants utilize a variety of low-tech and high-tech solutions, with tactile labeling systems and digital assistance apps being particularly prevalent. However, existing assistive technologies often fail to integrate seamlessly with users' preferred strategies, leading to frustration and underutilization. Addressing these barriers is crucial for enhancing the adoption of assistive technologies and ultimately improving the quality of life for people who are blind.

cs.HC↗