Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Lior Gishboliner

Publications and source records attributed to Lior Gishboliner.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
arXiv2025

Hypergraph removal with polynomial bounds

Given a fixed $k$-uniform hypergraph $F$, the $F$-removal lemma states that every hypergraph with few copies of $F$ can be made $F$-free by the removal of few edges. Unfortunately, for general $F$, the constants involved are given by incredibly fast-growing Ackermann-type functions. It is thus natural to ask for which $F$ one can prove removal lemmas with polynomial bounds. One trivial case where such bounds can be obtained is when $F$ is $k$-partite. Alon proved that when $k=2$ (i.e. when dealing with graphs), only bipartite graphs have a polynomial removal lemma. Kohayakawa, Nagle and Rödl conjectured in 2002 that Alon's result can be extended to all $k>2$, namely, that the only $k$-graphs $F$ for which the hypergraph removal lemma has polynomial bounds are the trivial cases when $F$ is $k$-partite. In this paper we prove this conjecture.

math.CO↗
arXiv2025

Hardness of Hypergraph Edge Modification Problems

For a fixed graph $F$, let $ex_F(G)$ denote the size of the largest $F$-free subgraph of $G$. Computing or estimating $ex_F(G)$ for various pairs $F,G$ is one of the central problems in extremal combinatorics. It is thus natural to ask how hard is it to compute this function. Motivated by an old problem of Yannakakis from the 80's, Alon, Shapira and Sudakov [ASS'09] proved that for every non-bipartite graph $F$, computing $ex_F(G)$ is NP-hard. Addressing a conjecture of Ailon and Alon (2007), we prove a hypergraph analogue of this theorem, showing that for every $k \geq 3$ and every non-$k$-partite $k$-graph $F$, computing $ex_F(G)$ is NP-hard. Furthermore, we conjecture that our hardness result can be extended to all $k$-graphs $F$ other than a matching of fixed size. If true, this would give a precise characterization of the $k$-graphs $F$ for which computing $ex_F(G)$ is NP-hard, since we also prove that when $F$ is a matching of fixed size, $ex_F(G)$ is computable in polynomial time. This last result can be considered an algorithmic version of the celebrated Erdős-Ko-Rado Theorem. The proof of [ASS'09] relied on a variety of tools from extremal graph theory, one of them being Turán's theorem. One of the main challenges we have to overcome in order to prove our hypergraph extension is the lack of a Turán-type theorem for $k$-graphs. To circumvent this, we develop a completely new graph theoretic approach for proving such hardness results.

math.CO↗
arXiv2025

Tight Hamilton cycles with high discrepancy

In this paper, we study discrepancy questions for spanning subgraphs of $k$-uniform hypergraphs. Our main result is that, for any integers $k \ge 3$ and $r \ge 2$, any $r$-colouring of the edges of a $k$-uniform $n$-vertex hypergraph $G$ with minimum $(k-1)$-degree $δ(G) \ge (1/2+o(1))n$ contains a tight Hamilton cycle with high discrepancy, that is, with at least $n/r+Ω(n)$ edges of one colour. The minimum degree condition is asymptotically best possible and our theorem also implies a corresponding result for perfect matchings. Our tools combine various structural techniques such as Turán-type problems and hypergraph shadows with probabilistic techniques such as random walks and the nibble method. We also propose several intriguing problems for future research.

math.CO↗
arXiv2024

Canonical Ramsey numbers of sparse graphs

The canonical Ramsey theorem of Erdős and Rado implies that for any graph $H$, any edge-coloring (with an arbitrary number of colors) of a sufficiently large complete graph $K_N$ contains a monochromatic, lexicographic, or rainbow copy of $H$. The least such $N$ is called the Erdős-Rado number of $H$, denoted by $ER(H)$. Erdős-Rado numbers of cliques have received considerable attention, and in this paper we extend this line of research by studying Erdős-Rado numbers of sparse graphs. For example, we prove that if $H$ has bounded degree, then $ER(H)$ is polynomial in $|V(H)|$ if $H$ is bipartite, but exponential in general. We also study the closely-related problem of constrained Ramsey numbers. For a given tree $S$ and given path $P_t$, we study the minimum $N$ such that every edge-coloring of $K_N$ contains a monochromatic copy of $S$ or a rainbow copy of $P_t$. We prove a nearly optimal upper bound for this problem, which differs from the best known lower bound by a function of inverse-Ackermann type.

math.CO↗
arXiv2024

Induced subgraphs of $K_r$-free graphs and the Erdős--Rogers problem

For two graphs $F,H$ and a positive integer $n$, the function $f_{F,H}(n)$ denotes the largest $m$ such that every $H$-free graph on $n$ vertices contains an $F$-free induced subgraph on $m$ vertices. This function has been extensively studied in the last 60 years when $F$ and $H$ are cliques and became known as the Erdős-Rogers function. Recently, Balogh, Chen and Luo, and Mubayi and Verstraëte initiated the systematic study of this function in the case where $F$ is a general graph. Answering, in a strong form, a question of Mubayi and Verstraëte, we prove that for every positive integer $r$ and every $K_{r-1}$-free graph $F$, there exists some $\varepsilon_F>0$ such that $f_{F,K_r}(n)=O(n^{1/2-\varepsilon_F})$. This result is tight in two ways. Firstly, it is no longer true if $F$ contains $K_{r-1}$ as a subgraph. Secondly, we show that for all $r\geq 4$ and $\varepsilon>0$, there exists a $K_{r-1}$-free graph $F$ for which $f_{F,K_r}(n)=Ω(n^{1/2-\varepsilon})$. Along the way of proving this, we show in particular that for every graph $F$ with minimum degree $t$, we have $f_{F,K_4}(n)=Ω(n^{1/2-6/\sqrt{t}})$. This answers (in a strong form) another question of Mubayi and Verstraëte. Finally, we prove that there exist absolute constants $0<c<C$ such that for each $r\geq 4$, if $F$ is a bipartite graph with sufficiently large minimum degree, then $Ω(n^{\frac{c}{\log r}})\leq f_{F,K_r}(n)\leq O(n^{\frac{C}{\log r}})$. This shows that for graphs $F$ with large minimum degree, the behaviour of $f_{F,K_r}(n)$ is drastically different from that of the corresponding off-diagonal Ramsey number $f_{K_2,K_r}(n)$.

math.CO↗
arXiv2024

An efficient asymmetric removal lemma and its limitations

The triangle removal states that if $G$ contains $\varepsilon n^2$ edge-disjoint triangles, then $G$ contains $δ(\varepsilon)n^3$ triangles. Unfortunately, there are no sensible bounds on the order of growth of $δ(\varepsilon)$, and at any rate, it is known that $δ(\varepsilon)$ is not polynomial in $\varepsilon$. Csaba recently obtained an asymmetric variant of the triangle removal, stating that if $G$ contains $\varepsilon n^2$ edge-disjoint triangles, then $G$ contains $2^{-\mathrm{poly}(1/\varepsilon)}\cdot n^5$ copies of $C_5$. To this end, he devised a new variant of Szemerédi's regularity lemma. We obtain the following results: - We first give a regularity-free proof of Csaba's theorem, which improves the number of copies of $C_5$ to the optimal number $\mathrm{poly}(\varepsilon)\cdot n^5$. - We say that $H$ is $K_3$-abundant if every graph containing $\varepsilon n^2$ edge-disjoint triangles has $\mathrm{poly}(\varepsilon)\cdot n^{|V(H)|}$ copies of $H$. It is easy to see that a $K_3$-abundant graph must be triangle-free and tripartite. Given our first result, it is natural to ask if all triangle-free tripartite graphs are $K_3$-abundant. Our second result is that assuming a well-known conjecture of Ruzsa in additive number theory, the answer to this question is negative. Our proofs use a mix of combinatorial, number-theoretic, probabilistic, and Ramsey-type arguments.

math.CO↗
arXiv2023

Difference-Isomorphic Graph Families

Many well-studied problems in extremal combinatorics deal with the maximum possible size of a family of objects in which every pair of objects satisfies a given restriction. One problem of this type was recently raised by Alon, Gujgiczer, Körner, Milojević and Simonyi. They asked to determine the maximum size of a family $\mathcal{G}$ of graphs on $[n]$, such that for every two $G_1,G_2 \in \mathcal{G}$, the graphs $G_1 \setminus G_2$ and $G_2 \setminus G_1$ are isomorphic. We completely resolve this problem by showing that this maximum is exactly $2^{\frac{1}{2}\big(\binom{n}{2} - \lfloor \frac{n}{2}\rfloor\big)}$ and characterizing all the extremal constructions. We also prove an analogous result for $r$-uniform hypergraphs.

math.CO↗
arXiv2023

Trimming forests is hard (unless they are made of stars)

Graph modification problems ask for the minimal number of vertex/edge additions/deletions needed to make a graph satisfy some predetermined property. A (meta) problem of this type, which was raised by Yannakakis in 1981, asks to determine for which properties ${\mathcal P}$, it is NP-hard to compute the smallest number of edge deletions needed to make a graph satisfy ${\mathcal P}$. Despite being extensively studied in the past 40 years, this problem is still wide open. In fact, it is open even when ${\mathcal P}$ is the property of being $H$-free, for some fixed graph $H$. In this case we use $\text{rem}_{H}(G)$ to denote the smallest number of edge deletions needed to turn $G$ into an $H$-free graph. Alon, Sudakov and Shapira [Annals of Math. 2009] proved that if $H$ is not bipartite, then computing $\text{rem}_{H}(G)$ is NP-hard. They left open the problem of classifying the bipartite graphs $H$ for which computing $\text{rem}_{H}(G)$ is NP-hard. In this paper we resolve this problem when $H$ is a forest, showing that computing $\text{rem}_{H}(G)$ is polynomial-time solvable if $H$ is a star forest and NP-hard otherwise. Our main innovation in this work lies in introducing a new graph theoretic approach for Yannakakis's problem, which differs significantly from all prior works on this subject. In particular, we prove new results concerning an old and famous conjecture of Erdős and Sós, which are of independent interest.

math.CO↗
arXiv2023

Ramsey problems for monotone paths in graphs and hypergraphs

The study of ordered Ramsey numbers of monotone paths for graphs and hypergraphs has a long history, going back to the celebrated work by Erdős and Szekeres in the early days of Ramsey theory. In this paper we obtain several results in this area, establishing two conjectures of Mubayi and Suk and improving bounds due to Balko, Cibulka, Král and Kynčl. We also obtain a color-monotone version of the well-known Canonical Ramsey Theorem of Erdős and Rado, which could be of independent interest.

math.CO↗
arXiv2023

On Rödl's Theorem for Cographs

A theorem of Rödl states that for every fixed $F$ and $\varepsilon>0$ there is $δ=δ_F(\varepsilon)$ so that every induced $F$-free graph contains a vertex set of size $δn$ whose edge density is either at most $\varepsilon$ or at least $1-\varepsilon$. Rödl's proof relied on the regularity lemma, hence it supplied only a tower-type bound for $δ$. Fox and Sudakov conjectured that $δ$ can be made polynomial in $\varepsilon$, and a recent result of Fox, Nguyen, Scott and Seymour shows that this conjecture holds when $F=P_4$. In fact, they show that the same conclusion holds even if $G$ contains few copies of $P_4$. In this note we give a short proof of a more general statement.

math.CO↗
arXiv2023

Testing versus estimation of graph properties, revisited

A distance estimator for a graph property $\mathcal{P}$ is an algorithm that given $G$ and $α, \varepsilon >0$ distinguishes between the case that $G$ is $(α-\varepsilon)$-close to $\mathcal{P}$ and the case that $G$ is $α$-far from $\mathcal{P}$ (in edit distance). We say that $\mathcal{P}$ is estimable if it has a distance estimator whose query complexity depends only on $\varepsilon$. Every estimable property is also testable, since testing corresponds to estimating with $α=\varepsilon$. A central result in the area of property testing, the Fischer--Newman theorem, gives an inverse statement: every testable property is in fact estimable. The proof of Fischer and Newman was highly ineffective, since it incurred a tower-type loss when transforming a testing algorithm for $\mathcal{P}$ into a distance estimator. This raised the natural problem, studied recently by Fiat--Ron and by Hoppen--Kohayakawa--Lang--Lefmann--Stagni, whether one can find a transformation with a polynomial loss. We obtain the following results. 1. If $\mathcal{P}$ is hereditary, then one can turn a tester for $\mathcal{P}$ into a distance estimator with an exponential loss. This is an exponential improvement over the result of Hoppen et. al., who obtained a transformation with a double exponential loss. 2. For every $\mathcal{P}$, one can turn a testing algorithm for $\mathcal{P}$ into a distance estimator with a double exponential loss. This improves over the transformation of Fischer--Newman that incurred a tower-type loss. Our main conceptual contribution in this work is that we manage to turn the approach of Fischer--Newman, which was inherently ineffective, into an efficient one. On the technical level, our main contribution is in establishing certain properties of Frieze--Kannan Weak Regular partitions that are of independent interest.

math.CO↗
arXiv2023

Large cliques or co-cliques in hypergraphs with forbidden order-size pairs

The well-known Erdős-Hajnal conjecture states that for any graph $F$, there exists $ε>0$ such that every $n$-vertex graph $G$ that contains no induced copy of $F$ has a homogeneous set of size at least $n^ε$. We consider a variant of the Erdős-Hajnal problem for hypergraphs where we forbid a family of hypergraphs described by their orders and sizes. For graphs, we observe that if we forbid induced subgraphs on $m$ vertices and $f$ edges for any positive $m$ and $0\leq f \leq \binom{m}{2}$, then we obtain large homogeneous sets. For triple systems, in the first nontrivial case $m=4$, for every $S \subseteq \{0,1,2,3,4\}$, we give bounds on the minimum size of a homogeneous set in a triple system where the number of edges spanned by every four vertices is not in $S$. In most cases the bounds are essentially tight. We also determine, for all $S$, whether the growth rate is polynomial or polylogarithmic. Some open problems remain.

math.CO↗
arXiv2023

Polynomial removal lemmas for ordered graphs

A recent result of Alon, Ben-Eliezer and Fischer establishes an induced removal lemma for ordered graphs. That is, if $F$ is an ordered graph and $\varepsilon>0$, then there exists $δ_{F}(\varepsilon)>0$ such that every $n$-vertex ordered graph $G$ containing at most $δ_{F}(\varepsilon) n^{v(F)}$ induced copies of $F$ can be made induced $F$-free by adding/deleting at most $\varepsilon n^2$ edges. We prove that $δ_{F}(\varepsilon)$ can be chosen to be a polynomial function of $\varepsilon$ if and only if $|V(F)|=2$, or $F$ is the ordered graph with vertices $x<y<z$ and edges $\{x,y\},\{x,z\}$ (up to complementation and reversing the vertex order). We also discuss similar problems in the non-induced case.

math.CO↗
arXiv2023

On Ramsey size-linear graphs and related questions

In this paper we prove several results on Ramsey numbers $R(H,F)$ for a fixed graph $H$ and a large graph $F$, in particular for $F = K_n$. These results extend earlier work of Erdős, Faudree, Rousseau and Schelp and of Balister, Schelp and Simonovits on so-called Ramsey size-linear graphs. Among others, we show that if $H$ is a subdivision of $K_4$ with at least $6$ vertices, then $R(H,F) = O(v(F) + e(F))$ for every graph $F$. We also conjecture that if $H$ is a connected graph with $e(H) - v(H) \leq \binom{k+1}{2} - 2$, then $R(H,K_n) = O(n^k)$. The case $k=2$ was proved by Erdős, Faudree, Rousseau and Schelp. We prove the case $k=3$.

math.CO↗
arXiv2023

Oriented discrepancy of Hamilton cycles

We propose the following conjecture extending Dirac's theorem: if $G$ is a graph with $n\ge 3$ vertices and minimum degree $δ(G)\ge n/2$, then in every orientation of $G$ there is a Hamilton cycle with at least $δ(G)$ edges oriented in the same direction. We prove an approximate version of this conjecture, showing that minimum degree $n/2 + O(k)$ guarantees a Hamilton cycle with at least $(n+k)/2$ edges oriented in the same direction. We also study the analogous problem for random graphs, showing that if the edge probability $p = p(n)$ is above the Hamiltonicity threshold, then, with high probability, in every orientation of $G \sim G(n,p)$ there is a Hamilton cycle with $(1-o(1))n$ edges oriented in the same direction.

math.CO↗
arXiv2023

Maximal Chordal Subgraphs

A chordal graph is a graph with no induced cycles of length at least $4$. Let $f(n,m)$ be the maximal integer such that every graph with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges has a chordal subgraph with at least $f(n,m)$ edges. In 1985 Erdős and Laskar posed the problem of estimating $f(n,m)$. In the late '80s, Erdős, Gyárfás, Ordman and Zalcstein determined the value of $f(n,n^2/4+1)$ and made a conjecture on the value of $f(n,n^2/3+1)$. In this paper we prove this conjecture and answer the question of Erdős and Laskar, determining $f(n,m)$ asymptotically for all $m$ and exactly for $m \leq n^2/3+1$.

math.CO↗
arXiv2023

Minimum Degree Threshold for $H$-factors with High Discrepancy

Given a graph $H$, a perfect $H$-factor in a graph $G$ is a collection of vertex-disjoint copies of $H$ spanning $G$. Kühn and Osthus showed that the minimum degree threshold for a graph $G$ to contain a perfect $H$-factor is either given by $1-1/χ(H)$ or by $1-1/χ_{cr}(H)$ depending on certain natural divisibility considerations. Given a graph $G$ of order $n$, a $2$-edge-coloring of $G$ and a subgraph $G'$ of $G$, we say that $G'$ has high discrepancy if it contains significantly (linear in $n$) more edges of one color than the other. Balogh, Csaba, Pluhár and Treglown asked for the minimum degree threshold guaranteeing that every 2-edge-coloring of $G$ has an $H$-factor with high discrepancy and they settled the case where $H$ is a clique. Here we completely resolve this question by determining the minimum degree threshold for high discrepancy of $H$-factors for every graph $H$.

math.CO↗
arXiv2023

The Minimum Degree Removal Lemma Thresholds

The graph removal lemma is a fundamental result in extremal graph theory which says that for every fixed graph $H$ and $\varepsilon > 0$, if an $n$-vertex graph $G$ contains $\varepsilon n^2$ edge-disjoint copies of $H$ then $G$ contains $δn^{v(H)}$ copies of $H$ for some $δ= δ(\varepsilon,H) > 0$. The current proofs of the removal lemma give only very weak bounds on $δ(\varepsilon,H)$, and it is also known that $δ(\varepsilon,H)$ is not polynomial in $\varepsilon$ unless $H$ is bipartite. Recently, Fox and Wigderson initiated the study of minimum degree conditions guaranteeing that $δ(\varepsilon,H)$ depends polynomially or linearly on $\varepsilon$. In this paper we answer several questions of Fox and Wigderson on this topic.

math.CO↗