arXiv subjects

Lishui Fan

Publications and source records attributed to Lishui Fan.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

ZeroCoder: Can LLMs Improve Code Generation Without Ground-Truth Supervision?

Code generation is important in software engineering, and Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is a powerful paradigm to improve it through execution-based feedback. However, most RLVR pipelines rely on human-curated tests, making progress bottlenecked by scarce and costly supervision. Existing work tried to use self-generated tests to ground rewards, but the lack of discriminative tests constrains the effect due to the sub-optimal performance of the model on test generation. We aim to improve code generation without ground-truth supervision by co-evolving code and test generation, so that their interactions yield progressively more informative supervision. To this end, we present ZeroCoder, a fully label-free co-evolutionary framework that jointly trains a Coder and a Tester using execution feedback from self-generated code-test interactions. For each problem, ZeroCoder executes sampled solutions against sampled tests to form a passing matrix, identifies a consensus subset of likely-correct solutions and consistent tests via a pluggable selection algorithm, and derives role-specific rewards. To ensure reward quality, ZeroCoder filters low-information instances via rank-based pre-filtering and trains the Tester with a curriculum balancing validity and mutation-driven discriminativeness. We further identify selector drift, the progressive miscalibration of fixed selection rules during co-evolution, and introduce DyB4, a Bayesian selector that uses as few as 10 labeled instances to recalibrate its priors dynamically. Across three models and six benchmarks, ZeroCoder consistently improves code generation and test generation. In the fully label-free setting, it improves code generation by up to 14.5% over the base model on Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct. With DyB4, the gain reaches 21.6%, while test generation improves by 24.3%, approaching oracle-supervised performance.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2026

Balancing Latency and Accuracy of Code Completion via Local-Cloud Model Cascading

Line-level code completion requires a critical balance between high accuracy and low latency. Existing methods suffer from a trade-off: large language models (LLMs) provide high-quality suggestions but incur high latency, while small language models (SLMs) are fast but often suboptimal. We propose MCCom (Model-Cascading-based code Completion), a framework that cascades a local SLM with a cloud-based LLM. To achieve effective cascading, MCCom leverages user actions as a novel signal to trigger the LLM only when the SLM fails, significantly reducing cloud computation costs. Furthermore, we introduce a two-stage speculative decoding strategy and an iterative retrieval mechanism to enhance collaboration between the models. We also train a 121M-parameter lightweight model, which achieves 73.8% of the performance of a 7B state-of-the-art model. Evaluated on RepoEval and a new real-world benchmark StmtEval, MCCom reduces inference latency by up to 47.9% and LLM usage by 46.3%, while improving the LLM's exact match rate by 8.9% through effective collaboration.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

ReCode: Reinforcing Code Generation with Reasoning-Process Rewards

In practice, rigorous reasoning is often a key driver of correct code, while Reinforcement Learning (RL) for code generation often neglects optimizing reasoning quality. Bringing process-level supervision into RL is appealing, but it faces two challenges. First, training reliable reward models to assess reasoning quality is bottlenecked by the scarcity of fine-grained preference data. Second, naively incorporating such neural rewards may suffer from reward hacking. This work proposes ReCode (Reasoning-Reinforced Code Generation), a novel RL training framework comprising: (1) Contrastive Reasoning-Process Reward Learning (CRPL), which trains a reward model with synthesized optimized and degraded reasoning variants to assess the quality of reasoning process; and (2) Consistency-Gated GRPO (CG-GRPO), which integrates the reasoning-process reward model into RL by gating neural reasoning-process rewards with strict execution outcomes, using execution correctness as a hard gate to mitigate reward hacking. Additionally, to assess the reward model's discriminative capability in assessing reasoning-process quality, we introduce LiveCodeBench-RewardBench (LCB-RB), a new benchmark comprising preference pairs of superior and inferior reasoning processes tailored for code generation. Experimental results across HumanEval(+), MBPP(+), LiveCodeBench, and BigCodeBench show that a 7B model trained with ReCode outperforms the base version by 16.1% and reaches performance comparable to GPT-4-Turbo. We further demonstrate the generalizability of ReCode by extending it to the math domain.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

FGIT: Fault-Guided Fine-Tuning for Code Generation

Modern instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) have made remarkable progress in code generation. However, these LLMs fine-tuned with standard supervised fine-tuning (SFT) sometimes generate plausible-looking but functionally incorrect code variants. This issue likely stems from the limitation of standard SFT, which treats all tokens equally during optimization and fails to emphasize the error-sensitive segments-specific code differences between correct implementations and similar incorrect variants. To address this problem, we propose Fault-Guided Fine-Tuning (FGIT), a novel fine-tuning technique that enhances LLMs' code generation by (1) extracting multi-granularity (line/token-level) differences between correct and incorrect yet similar implementations to identify error-sensitive segments, and (2) dynamically prioritizing those segments during training via dynamic loss weighting. Through extensive experiments on seven LLMs across three widely-used benchmarks, our method achieves an average relative improvement of 6.9% on pass@1 with some enhanced 6.7B LLMs outperforming closed-source models, e.g., GPT-3.5-Turbo. Furthermore, our fine-tuning technique demonstrates strong generalization with performance improvements ranging from 3.8% to 19.1% across diverse instruction-tuned LLMs, and our ablation studies confirm the contributions of different granularities of differences and hyperparameters.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2024

Self-Explained Keywords Empower Large Language Models for Code Generation

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance in code generation. However, due to the long-tail distribution of LLMs' training data, low-frequency terms are typically underrepresented in the training process. Consequently, LLMs often misunderstand or overlook problem-specific, low-frequency keywords during code generation, compromising the accuracy of the generated code. To address this, we propose a novel technique named SEK(\textbf{S}elf-\textbf{E}xplained \textbf{K}eywords), which empowers an LLM for better code generation by extracting and explaining the key terms in the problem description with the LLM itself and ranking them based on frequency. Comprehensive experiments across three benchmarks, i.e., HumanEval(+), MBPP(+), and APPS, with five representative LLMs, show that SEK can significantly improve LLMs in code generation, yielding substantial and consistent gains. For instance, SEK improves the Pass@1 of DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct from 85.4\% to 93.3\% on the Humaneval benchmark. Further analysis confirms that SEK enables the LLMs to shift their attention from low-frequency keywords to their corresponding high-frequency counterparts.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2024

Exploring the Capabilities of LLMs for Code Change Related Tasks

Developers deal with code-change-related tasks daily, e.g., reviewing code. Pre-trained code and code-change-oriented models have been adapted to help developers with such tasks. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have shown their effectiveness in code-related tasks. However, existing LLMs for code focus on general code syntax and semantics rather than the differences between two code versions. Thus, it is an open question how LLMs perform on code-change-related tasks. To answer this question, we conduct an empirical study using \textgreater 1B parameters LLMs on three code-change-related tasks, i.e., code review generation, commit message generation, and just-in-time comment update, with in-context learning (ICL) and parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT, including LoRA and prefix-tuning). We observe that the performance of LLMs is poor without examples and generally improves with examples, but more examples do not always lead to better performance. LLMs tuned with LoRA have comparable performance to the state-of-the-art small pre-trained models. Larger models are not always better, but \textsc{Llama~2} and \textsc{Code~Llama} families are always the best. The best LLMs outperform small pre-trained models on the code changes that only modify comments and perform comparably on other code changes. We suggest future work should focus more on guiding LLMs to learn the knowledge specific to the changes related to code rather than comments for code-change-related tasks.

cs.SE↗