arXiv subjects

Lorenzo Tortora de Falco

Publications and source records attributed to Lorenzo Tortora de Falco.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Connectivity at the crossroad of intuitionistic and classical polarizations in linear logic

We investigate a property that extends the Danos-Regnier correctness criterion for linear logic proof-structures. The property applies to the correctness graphs of a proof-structure: it states that any such graph is acyclic and the number of its connected components is exactly one more than the number of nodes bottom or weakening. This is known to be necessary but not sufficient in multiplicative exponential linear logic (MELL) to recover a sequent calculus proof from a proof-structure. We present a geometric restriction on proof-structures allowing us to turn this necessary property into a sufficient one, computationally efficient: we can thus introduce the notable fragment VMELL of MELL for which the property is indeed a correctness criterion. The fragment VMELL brings together the classical and intuitionistic polarizations. We translate the bang calculus terms into proof-nets of VMELL, factorize the usual translations in linear logic of the call-by-name and call-by-value lambda-calculi, prove that cut elimination simulates bang reduction, and provide an explicit characterization of the bang calculus terms as proof-nets.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Yeo's Theorem for Locally Colored Graphs: the Path to Sequentialization in Linear Logic

We revisit sequentialization proofs associated with the Danos-Regnier correctness criterion in the theory of proof nets of linear logic. Our approach relies on a generalization of Yeo's theorem for graphs, based on colorings of half-edges. This happens to be the appropriate level of abstraction to extract sequentiality information from a proof net without modifying its graph structure. We thus obtain different ways of recovering a sequent calculus derivation from a proof net inductively, by relying on a splitting vertex, which we can impose to be a par-vertex, or a terminal vertex, or a non-axiom vertex, etc., in a modular way. This approach applies in presence of the mix-rules as well as for proof nets of unit-free multiplicative-additive linear logic (through an appropriate further generalization of Yeo's theorem). The proof of our Yeo-style theorem relies on a key lemma that we call cusp minimization. Given a coloring of half-edges, a cusp in a path is a vertex whose adjacent half-edges in the path have the same color. And, given a cycle with at least one cusp and subject to suitable hypotheses, cusp minimization constructs a cycle with strictly less cusps. In the absence of cusp-free cycles, cusp minimization is then enough to ensure the existence of a splitting vertex, i.e. a vertex that is a cusp of any cycle it belongs to. Our theorem subsumes several graph-theoretical results, including some known to be equivalent to Yeo's theorem. The novelty is that they can be derived in a straightforward way, just by defining a dedicated coloring, again without any modification of the underlying graph structure (vertices and edges) -- similar results from the literature required more involved encodings.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

On the role of connectivity in Linear Logic proofs

We investigate a property that extends the Danos-Regnier correctness criterion for linear logic proof-structures. The property applies to the correctness graphs of a proof-structure: it states that any such graph is acyclic and the number of its connected components is exactly one more than the number of nodes bottom or weakening. This is known to be necessary but not sufficient in multiplicative exponential linear logic to recover a sequent calculus proof from a proof-structure. We present a geometric condition on untyped proof-structures allowing us to turn this necessary property into a sufficient one: we can thus isolate fragments of linear logic for which this property is indeed a correctness criterion. In a suitable fragment of multiplicative linear logic with units, the criterion yields a characterization of the equivalence induced by permutations of rules in sequent calculus. In intuitionistic linear logic, the property is equivalent to the familiar requirement of having exactly one output conclusion, and it is sufficient for sequentialization in the axiom-free setting.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2024

Linear Realisability over nets: multiplicatives (long version)

We provide a new realisability model based on orthogonality for the multiplicative fragment of linear logic, both in presence of generalised axioms (MLL*) and in the standard case (MLL). The novelty is the definition of cut elimination for generalised axioms. We prove that our model is adequate and complete both for MLL* and MLL.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2022

Gluing resource proof-structures: inhabitation and inverting the Taylor expansion

A Multiplicative-Exponential Linear Logic (MELL) proof-structure can be expanded into a set of resource proof-structures: its Taylor expansion. We introduce a new criterion characterizing (and deciding in the finite case) those sets of resource proof-structures that are part of the Taylor expansion of some MELL proof-structure, through a rewriting system acting both on resource and MELL proof-structures. We also prove semi-decidability of the type inhabitation problem for cut-free MELL proof-structures.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2019

Glueability of resource proof-structures: inverting the Taylor expansion (long version)

A Multiplicative-Exponential Linear Logic (MELL) proof-structure can be expanded into a set of resource proof-structures: its Taylor expansion. We introduce a new criterion characterizing those sets of resource proof-structures that are part of the Taylor expansion of some MELL proof-structure, through a rewriting system acting both on resource and MELL proof-structures.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2019

Proceedings Joint International Workshop on Linearity & Trends in Linear Logic and Applications

This volume contains a selection of papers presented at Linearity/TLLA 2018: Joint Linearity and TLLA workshops (part of FLOC 2018) held on July 7-8, 2018 in Oxford. Linearity has been a key feature in several lines of research in both theoretical and practical approaches to computer science. On the theoretical side there is much work stemming from linear logic dealing with proof technology, complexity classes and more recently quantum computation. On the practical side there is work on program analysis, expressive operational semantics for programming languages, linear programming languages, program transformation, update analysis and efficient implementation techniques. Linear logic is not only a theoretical tool to analyse the use of resources in logic and computation. It is also a corpus of tools, approaches, and methodologies (proof nets, exponential decomposition, geometry of interaction, coherent spaces, relational models, etc.) that were originally developed for the study of linear logic's syntax and semantics and are nowadays applied in several other fields.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2016

Relational type-checking for MELL proof-structures. Part 1: Multiplicatives

Relational semantics for linear logic is a form of non-idempotent intersection type system, from which several informations on the execution of a proof-structure can be recovered. An element of the relational interpretation of a proof-structure R with conclusion $Γ$ acts thus as a type (refining $Γ$) having R as an inhabitant. We are interested in the following type-checking question: given a proof-structure R, a list of formulae $Γ$, and a point x in the relational interpretation of $Γ$, is x in the interpretation of R? This question is decidable. We present here an algorithm that decides it in time linear in the size of R, if R is a proof-structure in the multiplicative fragment of linear logic. This algorithm can be extended to larger fragments of multiplicative-exponential linear logic containing $λ$-calculus.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2014

A semantic account of strong normalization in Linear Logic

We prove that given two cut free nets of linear logic, by means of their relational interpretations one can: 1) first determine whether or not the net obtained by cutting the two nets is strongly normalizable 2) then (in case it is strongly normalizable) compute the maximal length of the reduction sequences starting from that net.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2013

An Abstract Approach to Stratification in Linear Logic

We study the notion of stratification, as used in subsystems of linear logic with low complexity bounds on the cut-elimination procedure (the so-called light logics), from an abstract point of view, introducing a logical system in which stratification is handled by a separate modality. This modality, which is a generalization of the paragraph modality of Girard's light linear logic, arises from a general categorical construction applicable to all models of linear logic. We thus learn that stratification may be formulated independently of exponential modalities; when it is forced to be connected to exponential modalities, it yields interesting complexity properties. In particular, from our analysis stem three alternative reformulations of Baillot and Mazza's linear logic by levels: one geometric, one interactive, and one semantic.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2011

The relational model is injective for Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (without weakenings)

We show that for Multiplicative Exponential Linear Logic (without weakenings) the syntactical equivalence relation on proofs induced by cut-elimination coincides with the semantic equivalence relation on proofs induced by the multiset based relational model: one says that the interpretation in the model (or the semantics) is injective. We actually prove a stronger result: two cut-free proofs of the full multiplicative and exponential fragment of linear logic whose interpretations coincide in the multiset based relational model are the same "up to the connections between the doors of exponential boxes".

cs.LO↗