arXiv subjects

Louisa Cornelis

Publications and source records attributed to Louisa Cornelis.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

HOPSE: Scalable Higher-Order Positional and Structural Encoder for Combinatorial Representations

While Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have proven highly effective at modeling relational data, pairwise connections cannot fully capture multi-way relationships naturally present in complex real-world systems. In response to this, Topological Deep Learning (TDL) leverages more general combinatorial representations--such as simplicial or cellular complexes--to accommodate higher-order interactions. Existing TDL methods often extend GNNs through Higher-Order Message Passing (HOMP), but face critical scalability challenges due to the steep complexity overhead of propagating messages through combinatorial structures. To overcome this limitation, we propose HOPSE (Higher-Order Positional and Structural Encoder), a framework free of message passing layers that uses Hasse graph decompositions to derive efficient and expressive encodings over arbitrary higher-order domains. Notably, HOPSE scales linearly with the size of combinatorial representations while preserving the expressive power and permutation equivariance of the HOMP approaches. Experiments on molecular and topological benchmarks show that it matches or surpasses state-of-the-art performance while consistently achieving speedups over HOMP-based models, opening a new path for scalable TDL. The code is available at https://github.com/geometric-intelligence/topobench.git.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

OgBench: A Framework for Evaluating Graph Neural Networks on Omics Data

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have become the dominant framework for inductive graph-level learning. Yet most benchmarks focus on the regime $n \gg p$, where the number of graphs $n$ greatly exceeds the number of nodes per graph $p$. This overlooks biological domains such as omics, which operate in the opposite $n \ll p$ regime, characterized by large graphs of genes, transcripts, or proteins across few patient samples. This raises the question: \textit{how do GNNs perform in this low-sample, high-node omics setting?} We introduce \texttt{OgBench} (Omics-Graph Bench), the first benchmarking platform for graph-level prediction in the $n \ll p$ regime characteristic of omics data. We provide a standardized, end-to-end modular infrastructure from raw omics data to families of featured graphs with varied structural properties. We benchmark classical GNNs, as well as GNNs designed for large graphs and omics applications, alongside MLPs and machine learning baselines to establish reference performances. Our results show that widely used GNNs often do not outperform simple MLPs and classical baselines. These findings challenge the prevailing assumption that graph structure inherently adds value in this domain, fostering a critical reassessment of current learning paradigms. Ultimately, by exposing these limitations, OgBench provides the open-source ecosystem necessary for the community to develop and validate novel architectures explicitly tailored for biological graphs. The code is available at https://github.com/geometric-intelligence/ogbench.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

When Machine Learning Gets Personal: Evaluating Prediction and Explanation

In high-stakes domains like healthcare, users often expect that sharing personal information with machine learning systems will yield tangible benefits, such as more accurate diagnoses and clearer explanations of contributing factors. However, the validity of this assumption remains largely unexplored. We propose a unified framework to quantify how personalizing a model influences both prediction and explanation. We show that its impacts on prediction and explanation can diverge: a model may become more or less explainable even when prediction is unchanged. For practical settings, we study a standard hypothesis test for detecting personalization effects on demographic groups. We derive a finite-sample lower bound on its probability of error as a function of group sizes, number of personal attributes, and desired benefit from personalization. This provides actionable insights, such as which dataset characteristics are necessary to test an effect, or the maximum effect that can be tested given a dataset. We apply our framework to real-world tabular datasets using feature-attribution methods, uncovering scenarios where effects are fundamentally untestable due to the dataset statistics. Our results highlight the need for joint evaluation of prediction and explanation in personalized models and the importance of designing models and datasets with sufficient information for such evaluation.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Beyond Euclid: An Illustrated Guide to Modern Machine Learning with Geometric, Topological, and Algebraic Structures

The enduring legacy of Euclidean geometry underpins classical machine learning, which, for decades, has been primarily developed for data lying in Euclidean space. Yet, modern machine learning increasingly encounters richly structured data that is inherently nonEuclidean. This data can exhibit intricate geometric, topological and algebraic structure: from the geometry of the curvature of space-time, to topologically complex interactions between neurons in the brain, to the algebraic transformations describing symmetries of physical systems. Extracting knowledge from such non-Euclidean data necessitates a broader mathematical perspective. Echoing the 19th-century revolutions that gave rise to non-Euclidean geometry, an emerging line of research is redefining modern machine learning with non-Euclidean structures. Its goal: generalizing classical methods to unconventional data types with geometry, topology, and algebra. In this review, we provide an accessible gateway to this fast-growing field and propose a graphical taxonomy that integrates recent advances into an intuitive unified framework. We subsequently extract insights into current challenges and highlight exciting opportunities for future development in this field.

cs.LG↗