SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Luca Q. Zamboni

Publications and source records attributed to Luca Q. Zamboni.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Order symmetry and orthogonality of trajectories in discrete interval exchange transformations

Let $π=(<_D,<_A)$ be a pair of distinct orders on a $k$-letter alphabet $A. $ The periodic trajectories $v_i^\infty $ of a discrete $k$-interval exchange transformations $T$ with permutation $π$ are characterized by the following order symmetry : $v_i^ω<_D v_j^ω$ (lexicographically) if and only if $v_i^{-ω}<_Av_j^{-ω}$ (reverse lexicographically). For general words $u$ and $v$ over $A$, the orders need not agree in which case either $u^ω<_A v^ω<_D u^ω$ (Type 1) or $v^ω<_A u^ω<_D v^ω$ (Type 2). We partition all such order crossings amongst the set of conjugates of two words $u$ and $v$ into disjoint families $T_1(u,v)$ and $T_2(u,v)$ and define the index $i(u,v)$ by $|T_1(u,v)|+|T_2(u,v)|.$ Remarkably the difference, $|T_2(u,v)|-|T_1(u,v)|,$ depends only on the Parikh vectors $λ(u)$ and $λ(v).$ We show that $|T_2(u,v)|-|T_1(u,v)|=λ(u)^T Ωλ(v)$ where $Ω$ is a $k\times k$ skew symmetric matrix depending only on $π.$ It follows that the Parikh vectors of the trajectories of a discrete interval exchange are orthogonal with respect to $Ω.$ Applied to dimension $3,$ we obtain an arithmetic formula for the number of orbits in a discrete $3$-interval exchange and hence a characterization of minimality. For general $k,$ the orthogonality of the trajectories gives an upper bound $\lfloor \frac{k+d}2 \rfloor$ on the number of distinct trajectories where $d=\dim \ker (Ω).$ If $T$ is symmetric, then the number of distinct trajectories is at most$\lfloor \frac{k+1}2 \rfloor.$ An alternate interpretation of this result is that on an ordered $k$-letter alphabet, there are at most $\lfloor \frac{k+1}2 \rfloor$ primitive, pairwise non conjugate perfectly clustering words which perfectly cluster collectively in a single array in which all their conjugates are arranged in increasing order.

math.CO

Clustering, order conditions, and languages of interval exchanges

We investigate various connections between the clustering for the Burrows-Wheeler transform, a lossless algorithm used in data compression, and languages of interval exchange transformations. We show that a primitive word $u$ clusters for a pair of orders $(<_D,<_A)$ if and only if $u$ is a return word in the natural coding of a generalised interval exchange transformation with departure and arrival orders $(<_D,<_A)$. This answers a question of M. Lapointe on the perfect clustering of return words for a symmetric standard interval exchange transformation. We show that if $T$ is symmetric, then all natural codings are palindromically rich languages, and the orders of the induced transformation on a cylinder $[w]$ equal the original departure/arrival orders $(<_D,<_A)$ if and only if the shortest bispecial word containing $w$ is a palindrome. We also investigate language related features distinguishing between standard and generalised interval exchange transformations.

math.CO

On Christoffel words & their lexicographic array

By a Christoffel matrix we mean a $n\times n$ matrix corresponding to the lexicographic array of a Christoffel word of length $n.$ In this note we show that if $R$ is an integral domain, then the product of two Christoffel matrices over $R$ is commutative and is a Christoffel matrix over $R.$ Furthermore, if a Christoffel matrix over $R$ is invertible, then its inverse is a Christoffel matrix over $R.$ Consequently, the set $GC_n(R)$ of all $n\times n$ invertible Christoffel matrices over $R$ forms an abelian subgroup of $GL_n(R).$ The subset of $GC_n(R)$ consisting all invertible Christoffel matrices having some element $a$ on the diagonal and $b$ elsewhere (with $a,b \in R$ distinct) forms a subgroup $H$ of $GC_n(R).$ If $R$ is a field, then the quotient $GC_n(R)/H$ is isomorphic to $(\Z/nZ)^\times,$ the multiplicative group of integers modulo $n.$ It follows that for each finite field $F$ and each finite abelian group $G,$ there exists $n\geq 2$ and a faithful representation $G\rightarrow GL_n(F)$ consisting entirely of $n\times n$ (invertible) Christoffel matrices over $F.$ We describe the structure of $GC_n(\Z/2\Z).$

math.CO

Clustering and Arnoux-Rauzy words

We characterize the clustering of a word under the Burrows-Wheeler transform in terms of the resolution of a bounded number of bispecial factors belonging to the language generated by all its powers. We use this criterion to compute, in every given Arnoux-Rauzy language on three letters, an explicit bound $K$ such that each word of length at least $K$ is not clustering; this bound is sharp for a set of Arnoux-Rauzy languages including the Tribonacci one. In the other direction, we characterize all standard Arnoux-Rauzy clustering words, and all perfectly clustering Arnoux-Rauzy words. We extend some results to episturmian languages, characterizing those which produce infinitely many clustering words, and to larger alphabets.

math.DS

Extremal values of semi-regular continuants and codings of interval exchange transformations

Given a set $A$ of positive integers $a_1<\cdots<a_k$ and a partition $P: n_1+\cdots+n_k=n$, find the extremal denominators of the regular and semi-regular continued fraction $[0;x_1,\ldots,x_n]$ with partial quotients $x_i\in A$ and where each $a_i$ occurs exactly $n_i$ times in $x_1,\ldots,x_n$. In 1983, G. Ramharter gave an explicit description of the extremal arrangements of the regular continued fraction and the minimizing arrangement for the semi-regular continued fraction and showed that in each case the arrangement is unique up to reversal and independent of the actual values of the integers $a_i$. However, an explicit determination of a maximizing arrangement for the semi-regular continuant turned out to be more difficult. Ramharter conjectured that as in the other three cases, the maximizing arrangement is unique up to reversal and depends only on the partition $P$ and not on the values of the $a_i$. He further verified the conjecture in the case of a binary $A$. In this paper we confirm Ramharter's conjecture for sets $A$ with $|A|=3$ and give an algorithmic construction for the unique maximizing arrangement. We also show that Ramharter's conjecture fails for sets with $|A|\geq 4$, as the maximizing arrangement is in general neither unique nor independent of the values of the digits in $A$. The central idea is that the extremal arrangements satisfy a strong combinatorial condition, which may also be stated in the context of infinite sequences on an ordered set. We show that for bi-infinite binary words, this condition coincides with the Markoff property, discovered by A.A. Markoff in 1879 in his study of minima of binary quadratic forms. We further show that this same combinatorial condition is the fundamental property which describes the orbit structure of the natural codings of points under a symmetric $k$-interval exchange transformation.

math.CO

Languages of general interval exchange transformations

The languages generated by interval exchange transformations have been characterized by Ferenczi-Zamboni (2008) and Belov-Cernyatev (2010) under some extra conditions on the system. Lifting these conditions leads us to consider successively natural codings of standard interval exchange transformations, natural codings of affine interval exchange transformations, grouped codings of affine interval exchange transformations, and natural codings of generalized interval exchange transformations. We show that these four classes of languages are strictly increasing, and give necessary and/or sufficient (but not all equally explicit) combinatorial criteria to describe each of them. These work also, mutatis mutandis, for interval exchanges with flips

math.DS

A Ramsey Characterisation of Eventually Periodic Words

A factorisation $x = u_1 u_2 \cdots$ of an infinite word $x$ on alphabet $X$ is called `monochromatic', for a given colouring of the finite words $X^*$ on alphabet $X$, if each $u_i$ is the same colour. Wojcik and Zamboni proved that the word $x$ is periodic if and only if for every finite colouring of $X^*$ there is a monochromatic factorisation of $x$. On the other hand, it follows from Ramsey's theorem that, for \textit{any} word $x$, for every finite colouring of $X^*$ there is a suffix of $x$ having a monochromatic factorisation. A factorisation $x = u_1 u_2 \cdots$ is called `super-monochromatic' if each word $u_{k_1} u_{k_2} \cdots u_{k_n}$, where $k_1 < \cdots < k_n$, is the same colour. Our aim in this paper is to show that a word $x$ is eventually periodic if and only if for every finite colouring of $X^*$ there is a suffix of $x$ having a super-monochromatic factorisation. Our main tool is a Ramsey result about alternating sums that may be of independent interest.

math.CO

On the extremal values of the cyclic continuants of Motzkin and Straus

In a 1983 paper, G. Ramharter asks what are the extremal arrangements for the cyclic analogues of the regular and semi-regular continuants first introduced by T.S. Motzkin and E.G. Straus in 1956. In this paper we answer this question by showing that for each set $A$ consisting of positive integers $1<a_1<a_2<\cdots <a_k$ and a $k$-term partition $P: n_1+n_2 + \cdots + n_k=n$, there exists a unique (up to reversal) cyclic word $x$ which maximizes (resp. minimizes) the regular cyclic continuant $K^{\circlearrowright}(\cdot)$ amongst all cyclic words over $A$ with Parikh vector $(n_1,n_2,\ldots,n_k)$. We also show that the same is true for the minimizing arrangement for the semi-regular cyclic continuant $\dot K^{\circlearrowright}(\cdot)$. As in the non-cyclic case, the main difficulty is to find the maximizing arrangement for the semi-regular continuant, which is not unique in general and may depend on the integers $a_1,\ldots,a_k$ and not just on their relative order. We show that if a cyclic word $x$ maximizes $\dot K^{\circlearrowright}(\cdot)$ amongst all permutations of $x$, then it verifies a strong combinatorial condition which we call the singular property. We develop an algorithm for constructing all singular cyclic words having a prescribed Parikh vector.

math.CO

Continuants with equal values, a combinatorial approach

A regular continuant is the denominator $K$ of a terminating regular continued fraction, interpreted as a function of the partial quotients. We regard $K$ as a function defined on the set of all finite words on the alphabet $1<2<3<\dots$ with values in the positive integers. Given a word $w=w_1\cdots w_n$ with $w_i\in\mathbb{N}$ we define its multiplicity $μ(w)$ as the number of times the value $K(w)$ is assumed in the Abelian class $\mathcal{X}(w)$ of all permutations of the word $w.$ We prove that there is an infinity of different lacunary alphabets of the form $\{b_1<\dots <b_t<l+1<l+2<\dots <s\}$ with $b_j, t, l, s\in\mathbb{N}$ and $s$ sufficiently large such that $μ$ takes arbitrarily large values for words on these alphabets. The method of proof relies in part on a combinatorial characterisation of the word $w_{max}$ in the class $\mathcal{X}(w)$ where $K$ assumes its maximum.

math.CO

$ω$-Lyndon words

Let $\A$ be a finite non-empty set and $\preceq $ a total order on $\A^\nats$ verifying the following lexicographic like condition: For each $n\in \nats$ and $u, v\in \A^n,$ if $u^ω\prec v^ω$ then $ux\prec vy$ for all $x, y \in \A^\nats.$ A word $x\in \A^\nats$ is called $ω$-Lyndon if $x\prec y$ for each proper suffix $y$ of $x.$ A finite word $w\in \A^+$ is called $ω$-Lyndon if $w^ω\prec v^ω$ for each proper suffix $v$ of $w.$ In this note we prove that every infinite word may be written uniquely as a non-increasing product of $ω$-Lyndon words.

math.CO

Combining extensions of the Hales-Jewett\\ Theorem with Ramsey Theory\\ in other structures

The Hales-Jewett Theorem states that given any finite nonempty set $\A$ and any finite coloring of the free semigroup $S$ over the alphabet $\A$ there is a {\it variable word\/} over $\A$ all of whose instances are the same color. This theorem has some extensions involving several distinct variables occurring in the variable word. We show that, when combined with a sufficiently well behaved homomorphism, the relevant variable word simultaneously satisfies a Ramsey-Theoretic conclusion in the other structure. As an example we show that if $τ$ is the homomorphism from the set of variable words into the natural numbers which associates to each variable word $w$ the number of occurrences of the variable in $w$, then given any finite coloring of $S$ and any infinite sequence of natural numbers, there is a variable word $w$ whose instances are monochromatic and $τ(w)$ is a sum of distinct members of the given sequence. Our methods rely on the algebraic structure of the Stone-\v Cech compactification of $S$ and the other semigroups that we consider. We show for example that if $τ$ is as in the paragraph above, there is a compact subsemigroup $P$ of $β\ben$ which contains all of the idempotents of $β\ben$ such that, given any $p\in P$, any $A\in p$, and any finite coloring of $S$, there is a variable word $w$ whose instances are monochromatic and $τ(w)\in A$. We end with a new short algebraic proof of an infinitary extension of the Graham-Rothschild Parameter Sets Theorem.

math.CO

Anti-Powers in Infinite Words

In combinatorics of words, a concatenation of $k$ consecutive equal blocks is called a power of order $k$. In this paper we take a different point of view and define an anti-power of order $k$ as a concatenation of $k$ consecutive pairwise distinct blocks of the same length. As a main result, we show that every infinite word contains powers of any order or anti-powers of any order. That is, the existence of powers or anti-powers is an unavoidable regularity. Indeed, we prove a stronger result, which relates the density of anti-powers to the existence of a factor that occurs with arbitrary exponent. As a consequence, we show that in every aperiodic uniformly recurrent word, anti-powers of every order begin at every position. We further show that every infinite word avoiding anti-powers of order $3$ is ultimately periodic, while there exist aperiodic words avoiding anti-powers of order $4$. We also show that there exist aperiodic recurrent words avoiding anti-powers of order $6$.

cs.DM

A Taxonomy of Morphic Sequences

In this note we classify sequences according to whether they are morphic, pure morphic, uniform morphic, pure uniform morphic, primitive morphic, or pure primitive morphic, and for each possibility we either give an example or prove that no example is possible.

cs.FL

The sequence of open and closed prefixes of a Sturmian word

A finite word is closed if it contains a factor that occurs both as a prefix and as a suffix but does not have internal occurrences, otherwise it is open. We are interested in the {\it oc-sequence} of a word, which is the binary sequence whose $n$-th element is $0$ if the prefix of length $n$ of the word is open, or $1$ if it is closed. We exhibit results showing that this sequence is deeply related to the combinatorial and periodic structure of a word. In the case of Sturmian words, we show that these are uniquely determined (up to renaming letters) by their oc-sequence. Moreover, we prove that the class of finite Sturmian words is a maximal element with this property in the class of binary factorial languages. We then discuss several aspects of Sturmian words that can be expressed through this sequence. Finally, we provide a linear-time algorithm that computes the oc-sequence of a finite word, and a linear-time algorithm that reconstructs a finite Sturmian word from its oc-sequence.

cs.DM

Monochromatic factorisations of words and periodicity

In 2006 T. Brown asked the following question: Given a non-periodic infinite word $x=x_1x_2x_3\cdots$ with values in a non-empty set $\mathbb{A},$ does there exist a finite coloring $φ: \mathbb{A}^+\rightarrow C$ relative to which $x$ does not admit a $φ$-monochromatic factorisation, i.e., a factorisation of the form $x=u_1u_2u_3\cdots$ with $φ(u_i)=φ(u_j)$ for all $i,j\geq 1$? Various partial results in support of an affirmative answer to this question have appeared in the literature in recent years. In particular it is known that the question admits an affirmative answer for all non-uniformly recurrent words and various classes of uniformly recurrent words including Sturmian words. In this note we answer this question in general by showing that if $x=x_1x_2x_3\cdots$ is an infinite word with values in a non-empty set $\mathbb{A},$ then $x$ is periodic if and only if for every $2$-coloring $φ: \mathbb{A}^+\rightarrow \{0,1\}$ there exists a $φ$-monochromatic factorisation of $x.$ This characterization of periodicity of infinite words may be reformulated in the language of ultrafilters. Let $β\mathbb{A}^+$ denote the Stone-Cech compactification of the discrete semigroup $\mathbb{A}^+$ which we regard as the set of all ultrafilters on $\mathbb{A}^+.$ Then $x$ is periodic if and only if there exists $p\in β\mathbb{A}^+$ such that for each $A\in p$ there exists a factorisation $x=u_1u_2u_3\cdots $ with each $u_i \in A.$

math.CO

Recurrence in the dynamical system $(X,\langle T_s\rangle_{s\in S})$ and ideals of $βS$

A {\it dynamical system\/} is a pair $(X,\langle T_s\rangle_{s\in S})$, where $X$ is a compact Hausdorff space, $S$ is a semigroup, for each $s\in S$, $T_s$ is a continuous function from $X$ to $X$, and for all $s,t\in S$, $T_s\circ T_t=T_{st}$. Given a point $p\inβS$, the Stone-\v Cech compactification of the discrete space $S$, $T_p:X\to X$ is defined by, for $x\in X$, $\displaystyle T_p(x)=p{-}\!\lim_{s\in S}T_s(x)$. We let $βS$ have the operation extending the operation of $S$ such that $βS$ is a right topological semigroup and multiplication on the left by any point of $S$ is continuous. Given $p,q\inβS$, $T_p\circ T_q=T_{pq}$, but $T_p$ is usually not continuous. Given a dynamical system $(X,\langle T_s\rangle_{s\in S})$, and a point $x\in X$, we let $U(x)=\{p\inβS:T_p(x)$ is uniformly recurrent$\}$. We show that each $U(x)$ is a left ideal of $βS$ and for any semigroup we can get a dynamical system with respect to which $K(βS)=\bigcap_{x\in X}U(x)$ and $c\ell K(βS)=\bigcap\{U(x):x\in X$ and $U(x)$ is closed$\}$. And we show that weak cancellation assumptions guarantee that each such $U(x)$ properly contains $K(βS)$ and has $U(x) \setminus c\ell K(βS)\neq \emptyset$.

math.DS

Cost and dimension of words of zero topological entropy

Let $A^*$ denote the free monoid generated by a finite nonempty set $A.$ In this paper we introduce a new measure of complexity of languages $L\subseteq A^*$ defined in terms of the semigroup structure on $A^*.$ For each $L\subseteq A^*,$ we define its {\it cost} $c(L)$ as the infimum of all real numbers $α$ for which there exist a language $S\subseteq A^*$ with $p_S(n)=O(n^α)$ and a positive integer $k$ with $L\subseteq S^k.$ We also define the {\it cost dimension} $d_c(L)$ as the infimum of the set of all positive integers $k$ such that $L\subseteq S^k$ for some language $S$ with $p_S(n)=O(n^{c(L)}).$ We are primarily interested in languages $L$ given by the set of factors of an infinite word $x=x_0x_1x_2\cdots \in A^ω$ of zero topological entropy, in which case $c(L)<+\infty.$ We establish the following characterisation of words of linear factor complexity: Let $x\in A^ω$ and $L=$Fac$(x)$ be the set of factors of $x.$ Then $p_x(n)=Θ(n)$ if and only $c(L)=0$ and $d_c(L)=2.$ In other words, $p_x(n)=O(n)$ if and only if Fac$(x)\subseteq S^2$ for some language $S\subseteq A^+$ of bounded complexity (meaning $\limsup p_S(n)<+\infty).$ In general the cost of a language $L$ reflects deeply the underlying combinatorial structure induced by the semigroup structure on $A^*.$ For example, in contrast to the above characterisation of languages generated by words of sub-linear complexity, there exist non factorial languages $L$ of complexity $p_L(n)=O(\log n)$ (and hence of cost equal to $0)$ and of cost dimension $+\infty.$ In this paper we investigate the cost and cost dimension of languages defined by infinite words of zero topological entropy.

math.CO

Cyclic Complexity of Words

We introduce and study a complexity function on words $c_x(n),$ called \emph{cyclic complexity}, which counts the number of conjugacy classes of factors of length $n$ of an infinite word $x.$ We extend the well-known Morse-Hedlund theorem to the setting of cyclic complexity by showing that a word is ultimately periodic if and only if it has bounded cyclic complexity. Unlike most complexity functions, cyclic complexity distinguishes between Sturmian words of different slopes. We prove that if $x$ is a Sturmian word and $y$ is a word having the same cyclic complexity of $x,$ then up to renaming letters, $x$ and $y$ have the same set of factors. In particular, $y$ is also Sturmian of slope equal to that of $x.$ Since $c_x(n)=1$ for some $n\geq 1$ implies $x$ is periodic, it is natural to consider the quantity $\liminf_{n\rightarrow \infty} c_x(n).$ We show that if $x$ is a Sturmian word, then $\liminf_{n\rightarrow \infty} c_x(n)=2.$ We prove however that this is not a characterization of Sturmian words by exhibiting a restricted class of Toeplitz words, including the period-doubling word, which also verify this same condition on the limit infimum. In contrast we show that, for the Thue-Morse word $t$, $\liminf_{n\rightarrow \infty} c_t(n)=+\infty.$

cs.FL