arXiv subjects

Luciana Ferrer

Publications and source records attributed to Luciana Ferrer.

40 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

arXiv2019

A discriminative condition-aware backend for speaker verification

We present a scoring approach for speaker verification that mimics the standard PLDA-based backend process used in most current speaker verification systems. However, unlike the standard backends, all parameters of the model are jointly trained to optimize the binary cross-entropy for the speaker verification task. We further integrate the calibration stage inside the model, making the parameters of this stage depend on metadata vectors that represent the conditions of the signals. We show that the proposed backend has excellent out-of-the-box calibration performance on most of our test sets, making it an ideal approach for cases in which the test conditions are not known and development data is not available for training a domain-specific calibration model.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2018

Joint PLDA for Simultaneous Modeling of Two Factors

Probabilistic linear discriminant analysis (PLDA) is a method used for biometric problems like speaker or face recognition that models the variability of the samples using two latent variables, one that depends on the class of the sample and another one that is assumed independent across samples and models the within-class variability. In this work, we propose a generalization of PLDA that enables joint modeling of two sample-dependent factors: the class of interest and a nuisance condition. The approach does not change the basic form of PLDA but rather modifies the training procedure to consider the dependency across samples of the latent variable that models within-class variability. While the identity of the nuisance condition is needed during training, it is not needed during testing since we propose a scoring procedure that marginalizes over the corresponding latent variable. We show results on a multilingual speaker-verification task, where the language spoken is considered a nuisance condition. We show that the proposed joint PLDA approach leads to significant performance gains in this task for two different datasets, in particular when the training data contains mostly or only monolingual speakers.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2018

Scoring Formulation for Multi-Condition Joint PLDA

The joint PLDA model, is a generalization of PLDA where the nuisance variable is no longer considered independent across samples, but potentially shared (tied) across samples that correspond to the same nuisance condition. The original work considered a single nuisance condition, deriving the EM and scoring formulas for this scenario. In this document, we show how to obtain likelihood ratios for scoring when multiple nuisance conditions are allowed in the model.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2018

Joint Probabilistic Linear Discriminant Analysis

Standard probabilistic linear discriminant analysis (PLDA) for speaker recognition assumes that the sample's features (usually, i-vectors) are given by a sum of three terms: a term that depends on the speaker identity, a term that models the within-speaker variability and is assumed independent across samples, and a final term that models any remaining variability and is also independent across samples. In this work, we propose a generalization of this model where the within-speaker variability is not necessarily assumed independent across samples but dependent on another discrete variable. This variable, which we call the channel variable as in the standard PLDA approach, could be, for example, a discrete category for the channel characteristics, the language spoken by the speaker, the type of speech in the sample (conversational, monologue, read), etc. The value of this variable is assumed to be known during training but not during testing. Scoring is performed, as in standard PLDA, by computing a likelihood ratio between the null hypothesis that the two sides of a trial belong to the same speaker versus the alternative hypothesis that the two sides belong to different speakers. The two likelihoods are computed by marginalizing over two hypothesis about the channels in both sides of a trial: that they are the same and that they are different. This way, we expect that the new model will be better at coping with same-channel versus different-channel trials than standard PLDA, since knowledge about the channel (or language, or speech style) is used during training and implicitly considered during scoring.

cs.LG↗