Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Luis Nunes Vicente

Publications and source records attributed to Luis Nunes Vicente.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Pareto sensitivity, most-changing sub-fronts, and knee solutions

When dealing with a multi-objective optimization problem, identifying Pareto optimal solutions that capture relevant trade-offs may not be straightforward. Popular choices include the so-called Pareto knee solutions, which correspond to nondominated points on the Pareto front where a small improvement in any objective leads to a large deterioration in at least one other objective. In this paper, using Pareto sensitivity, we relate Pareto knee solutions to Geoffrion's concept of proper efficiency and show how to compute them according to their verbal (informal) definition of least maximal change. We refer to the resulting approach as the sensitivity knee (snee) approach, and we apply it to unconstrained and constrained problems. Pareto sensitivity can also be used to compute local most-changing Pareto sub-fronts around a nondominated point, where points on the sub-fronts are distributed along directions of maximum change. Our approach is restricted to scalarized methods, in particular to the weighted-sum or epsilon-constrained methods, and requires the computation or approximations of first- and second-order derivatives. We include numerical results from synthetic problems that illustrate our approach.

math.OC↗

Non-monotone direct-search methods for deterministic and stochastic derivative-free optimization

In derivative-free optimization (DFO), one minimizes functions for which the gradient is unavailable or expensive to compute. In many applications, objective function values and gradients are noisy due to simulations or system randomness. A class of standard direct-search methods for DFO accept a trial point when it decreases the objective function by an amount proportional to the squared stepsize. However, when applied to complex landscapes, such a requirement may trap the algorithm in a neighborhood of sub-optimal solutions. We study a non-monotone direct-search alternative where the trial function value is compared with the largest objective function obtained through the $M$ most recent distinct iterates. This max-$M$ non-monotone condition permits temporary increases in the objective function and can help navigate narrow curved valleys; however, its theoretical analysis is significantly more challenging due to the lack of monotonic decrease. In this paper, we develop a comprehensive complexity theory for the max-$M$ non-monotone direct-search in both deterministic and stochastic DFO problems. For deterministic objectives, we establish a worst-case iteration bound for a complete poll based on a positive spanning set and an expected iteration bound for a probabilistic-descent poll. We then analyze a stochastic variant using independent function estimates and show the expected iteration complexity under tail-bound assumptions of the stochastic errors. All three results have the standard complexity of $\mathcal{O}(ε^{-2})$, which matches the iteration complexity of monotone direct-search methods. Our theory is enabled by a new family of merit functions that correct the stored objective values by ordered multiples of the squared stepsize, together with a renewal-reward stopping-time argument for the probabilistic methods.

math.OC↗

Non-smooth stochastic gradient descent using smoothing functions

In this paper, we address stochastic optimization problems involving a composition of a non-smooth outer function and a smooth inner function, a formulation frequently encountered in machine learning and operations research. To deal with the non-differentiability of the outer function, we approximate the original non-smooth function using smoothing functions, which are continuously differentiable and approach the original function as a smoothing parameter goes to zero (at the price of increasingly higher Lipschitz constants). The proposed smoothing stochastic gradient method iteratively drives the smoothing parameter to zero at a designated rate. We establish convergence guarantees under strongly convex, convex, and non-convex settings, proving convergence rates that match known results for non-smooth stochastic compositional optimization. In particular, for convex objectives, smoothing stochastic gradient achieves a 1/T^(1/4) rate in terms of the number of stochastic gradient evaluations. We further show how general compositional and finite-sum compositional problems (widely used frameworks in large-scale machine learning and risk-averse optimization) fit the assumptions needed for the rates (unbiased gradient estimates, bounded second moments, and accurate smoothing errors). We present preliminary numerical results indicating that smoothing stochastic gradient descent can be competitive for certain classes of problems.

math.OC↗

Stochastic block coordinate and function alternation for multi-objective optimization and learning

Multi-objective optimization is central to many engineering and machine learning applications, where multiple objectives must be optimized in balance. While multi-gradient based optimization methods combine these objectives in each step, such methods require computing gradients with respect to all variables at every iteration, resulting in high computational costs in large-scale settings. In this work, we propose a framework that simultaneously alternates the optimization of each objective and the (stochastic) gradient update with respect to each variable block. Our framework reduces per-iteration computational cost while enabling exploration of the Pareto front by allocating a prescribed number of gradient steps to each objective. We establish rigorous convergence guarantees across several stochastic smooth settings, including convex, non-convex, and Polyak-Lojasiewicz conditions, recovering classical convergence rates of single-objective methods. Numerical experiments demonstrate that our framework outperforms non-alternating methods on multi-target regression and produces a competitive Pareto front approximation, highlighting its computational efficiency and practical effectiveness.

math.OC↗

Stochastic set-valued optimization and its application to robust learning

In this paper, we develop a stochastic set-valued optimization (SVO) framework tailored for robust machine learning. In the SVO setting, each decision variable is mapped to a set of objective values, and optimality is defined via set relations. We focus on SVO problems with hyperbox sets, which can be reformulated as multi-objective optimization (MOO) problems with finitely many objectives and serve as a foundation for representing or approximating more general mapped sets. Two special cases of hyperbox-valued optimization (HVO) are interval-valued (IVO) and rectangle-valued (RVO) optimization. We construct stochastic IVO/RVO formulations that incorporate subquantiles and superquantiles into the objective functions of the MOO reformulations, providing a new characterization for subquantiles. These formulations provide interpretable trade-offs by capturing both lower- and upper-tail behaviors of loss distributions, thereby going beyond standard empirical risk minimization and classical robust models. To solve the resulting multi-objective problems, we adopt stochastic multi-gradient algorithms and select a Pareto knee solution. In numerical experiments, the proposed algorithms with this selection strategy exhibit improved robustness and reduced variability across test replications under distributional shift compared with empirical risk minimization, while maintaining competitive accuracy.

math.OC↗

Sequential test sampling for stochastic derivative-free optimization

In many derivative-free optimization algorithms, a sufficient decrease condition decides whether to accept a trial step in each iteration. This condition typically requires that the potential objective function value decrease of the trial step, i.e., the true reduction in the objective function value that would be achieved by moving from the current point to the trial point, be larger than a multiple of the squared stepsize. When the objective function is stochastic, evaluating such a condition accurately can require a large estimation cost. In this paper, we frame the evaluation of the sufficient decrease condition in a stochastic setting as a hypothesis test problem and solve it through a sequential hypothesis test. The two hypotheses considered in the problem correspond to accepting or rejecting the trial step. This test sequentially collects noisy sample observations of the potential decrease until their sum crosses either a lower or an upper boundary depending on the noise variance and the stepsize. When the noise of observations is Gaussian, we derive a novel sample size result, showing that the effort to evaluate the condition explicitly depends on the potential decrease, and that the sequential test terminates early whenever the sufficient decrease condition is away from satisfaction. Furthermore, when the potential decrease is~$Θ(δ^r)$ for some~$r\in(0,2]$, the expected sample size decreases from~$Θ(δ^{-4})$ to~$O(δ^{-2-r})$. We apply this sequential test sampling framework to probabilistic-descent direct search. To analyze its convergence rate, we extend a renewal-reward supermartingale-based convergence rate analysis framework to an arbitrary probability threshold. By doing so, we are able to show that probabilistic-descent direct search has an iteration complexity of $O(n/ε^2)$ for gradient norm...

math.OC↗

A stochastic gradient method for trilevel optimization

With the success that the field of bilevel optimization has seen in recent years, similar methodologies have started being applied to solving more difficult applications that arise in trilevel optimization. At the helm of these applications are new machine learning formulations that have been proposed in the trilevel context and, as a result, efficient and theoretically sound stochastic methods are required. In this work, we propose the first-ever stochastic gradient descent method for solving unconstrained trilevel optimization problems and provide a convergence theory that covers all forms of inexactness of the trilevel adjoint gradient, such as the inexact solutions of the middle-level and lower-level problems, inexact computation of the trilevel adjoint formula, and noisy estimates of the gradients, Hessians, Jacobians, and tensors of third-order derivatives involved. We also demonstrate the promise of our approach by providing numerical results on both synthetic trilevel problems and trilevel formulations for hyperparameter adversarial tuning.

math.OC↗

Full-Low Evaluation Methods For Bound and Linearly Constrained Derivative-Free Optimization

Derivative-free optimization (DFO) consists in finding the best value of an objective function without relying on derivatives. To tackle such problems, one may build approximate derivatives, using for instance finite-difference estimates. One may also design algorithmic strategies that perform space exploration and seek improvement over the current point. The first type of strategy often provides good performance on smooth problems but at the expense of more function evaluations. The second type is cheaper and typically handles non-smoothness or noise in the objective better. Recently, full-low evaluation methods have been proposed as a hybrid class of DFO algorithms that combine both strategies, respectively denoted as Full-Eval and Low-Eval. In the unconstrained case, these methods showed promising numerical performance. In this paper, we extend the full-low evaluation framework to bound and linearly constrained derivative-free optimization. We derive convergence results for an instance of this framework, that combines finite-difference quasi-Newton steps with probabilistic direct-search steps. The former are projected onto the feasible set, while the latter are defined within tangent cones identified by nearby active constraints. We illustrate the practical performance of our instance on standard linearly constrained problems, that we adapt to introduce noisy evaluations as well as non-smoothness. In all cases, our method performs favorably compared to algorithms that rely solely on Full-eval or Low-eval iterations.

math.OC↗

Why is soccer so popular: Understanding underdog achievement and randomness in team ball sports

In this paper, we examine team ball sports to investigate how the likelihood of weaker teams winning against stronger ones, referred to as underdog achievement, is influenced by inherent randomness factors that affect match outcomes in such sports. To address our research question, we collected data on match scores and computed corresponding team rankings from major international competitions for 12 popular team ball sports: basketball, cricket, field hockey, futsal, handball, ice hockey, lacrosse, roller hockey, rugby, soccer, volleyball, and water polo. Then, we developed an underdog achievement score to identify the sports with the highest occurrences of weaker teams prevailing over stronger ones, and we designed a randomness model consisting of factors that contribute to unexpected match outcomes within each sport. Our findings indicate that soccer is among the sports in which a weaker team is most likely to win. Through principal component analysis (PCA) and correlation analysis, we demonstrate that our randomness model can explain such a phenomenon, showing that the underdog achievement can be attributed to numerous factors that can randomly influence match outcomes.

stat.AP↗

The limitation of neural nets for approximation and optimization

We are interested in assessing the use of neural networks as surrogate models to approximate and minimize objective functions in optimization problems. While neural networks are widely used for machine learning tasks such as classification and regression, their application in solving optimization problems has been limited. Our study begins by determining the best activation function for approximating the objective functions of popular nonlinear optimization test problems, and the evidence provided shows that~SiLU has the best performance. We then analyze the accuracy of function value, gradient, and Hessian approximations for such objective functions obtained through interpolation/regression models and neural networks. When compared to interpolation/regression models, neural networks can deliver competitive zero- and first-order approximations (at a high training cost) but underperform on second-order approximation. However, it is shown that combining a neural net activation function with the natural basis for quadratic interpolation/regression can waive the necessity of including cross terms in the natural basis, leading to models with fewer parameters to determine. Lastly, we provide evidence that the performance of a state-of-the-art derivative-free optimization algorithm can hardly be improved when the gradient of an objective function is approximated using any of the surrogate models considered, including neural networks.

cs.LG↗

Inexact bilevel stochastic gradient methods for constrained and unconstrained lower-level problems

Two-level stochastic optimization formulations have become instrumental in a number of machine learning contexts such as continual learning, neural architecture search, adversarial learning, and hyperparameter tuning. Practical stochastic bilevel optimization problems become challenging in optimization or learning scenarios where the number of variables is high or there are constraints. In this paper, we introduce a bilevel stochastic gradient method for bilevel problems with nonlinear and possibly nonconvex lower-level constraints. We also present a comprehensive convergence theory that addresses both the lower-level unconstrained and constrained cases and covers all inexact calculations of the adjoint gradient (also called hypergradient), such as the inexact solution of the lower-level problem, inexact computation of the adjoint formula (due to the inexact solution of the adjoint equation or use of a truncated Neumann series), and noisy estimates of the gradients, Hessians, and Jacobians involved. To promote the use of bilevel optimization in large-scale learning, we have developed new low-rank practical bilevel stochastic gradient methods (BSG-N-FD and~BSG-1) that do not require second-order derivatives and, in the lower-level unconstrained case, dismiss any matrix-vector products.

math.OC↗

Bilevel optimization with a multi-objective lower-level problem: Risk-neutral and risk-averse formulations

In this work, we propose different formulations and gradient-based algorithms for deterministic and stochastic bilevel problems with conflicting objectives in the lower level. Such problems have received little attention in the deterministic case and have never been studied from a stochastic approximation viewpoint despite the recent advances in stochastic methods for single-level, bilevel, and multi-objective optimization. To solve bilevel problems with a multi-objective lower level, different approaches can be considered depending on the interpretation of the lower-level optimality. An optimistic formulation that was previously introduced for the deterministic case consists of minimizing the upper-level function over all non-dominated lower-level solutions. In this paper, we develop new risk-neutral and risk-averse formulations, address their main computational challenges, and develop the corresponding deterministic and stochastic gradient-based algorithms.

math.OC↗

Stochastic trust-region and direct-search methods: A weak tail bound condition and reduced sample sizing

Using tail bounds, we introduce a new probabilistic condition for function estimation in stochastic derivative-free optimization which leads to a reduction in the number of samples and eases algorithmic analyses. Moreover, we develop simple stochastic direct-search and trust-region methods for the optimization of a potentially non-smooth function whose values can only be estimated via stochastic observations. For trial points to be accepted, these algorithms require the estimated function values to yield a sufficient decrease measured in terms of a power larger than 1 of the algoritmic stepsize. Our new tail bound condition is precisely imposed on the reduction estimate used to achieve such a sufficient decrease. This condition allows us to select the stepsize power used for sufficient decrease in such a way to reduce the number of samples needed per iteration. In previous works, the number of samples necessary for global convergence at every iteration $k$ of this type of algorithms was $O(Δ_{k}^{-4})$, where $Δ_k$ is the stepsize or trust-region radius. However, using the new tail bound condition, and under mild assumptions on the noise, one can prove that such a number of samples is only $O(Δ_k^{-2 - \varepsilon})$, where $\varepsilon > 0$ can be made arbitrarily small by selecting the power of the stepsize in the sufficient decrease test arbitrarily close to $1$. The global convergence properties of the stochastic direct-search and trust-region algorithms are established under the new tail bound condition.

math.OC↗

Convergence rates of the stochastic alternating algorithm for bi-objective optimization

Stochastic alternating algorithms for bi-objective optimization are considered when optimizing two conflicting functions for which optimization steps have to be applied separately for each function. Such algorithms consist of applying a certain number of steps of gradient or subgradient descent on each single objective at each iteration. In this paper, we show that stochastic alternating algorithms achieve a sublinear convergence rate of $\mathcal{O}(1/T)$, under strong convexity, for the determination of a minimizer of a weighted-sum of the two functions, parameterized by the number of steps applied on each of them. An extension to the convex case is presented for which the rate weakens to $\mathcal{O}(1/\sqrt{T})$. These rates are valid also in the non-smooth case. Importantly, by varying the proportion of steps applied to each function, one can determine an approximation to the Pareto front.

math.OC↗

Full-low evaluation methods for derivative-free optimization

We propose a new class of rigorous methods for derivative-free optimization with the aim of delivering efficient and robust numerical performance for functions of all types, from smooth to non-smooth, and under different noise regimes. To this end, we have developed Full-Low Evaluation methods, organized around two main types of iterations. The first iteration type is expensive in function evaluations, but exhibits good performance in the smooth and non-noisy cases. For the theory, we consider a line search based on an approximate gradient, backtracking until a sufficient decrease condition is satisfied. In practice, the gradient was approximated via finite differences, and the direction was calculated by a quasi-Newton step (BFGS). The second iteration type is cheap in function evaluations, yet more robust in the presence of noise or non-smoothness. For the theory, we consider direct search, and in practice we use probabilistic direct search with one random direction and its negative. A switch condition from Full-Eval to Low-Eval iterations was developed based on the values of the line-search and direct-search stepsizes. If enough Full-Eval steps are taken, we derive a complexity result of gradient-descent type. Under failure of Full-Eval, the Low-Eval iterations become the drivers of convergence yielding non-smooth convergence. Full-Low Evaluation methods are shown to be efficient and robust in practice across problems with different levels of smoothness and noise.

math.OC↗

An integrated assignment, routing, and speed model for roadway mobility and transportation with environmental, efficiency, and service goals

Managing all the mobility and transportation services with autonomous vehicles for users of a smart city requires determining the assignment of the vehicles to the users and their routing in conjunction with their speed. Such decisions must ensure low emission, efficiency, and high service quality by also considering the impact on traffic congestion caused by other vehicles in the transportation network. In this paper, we first propose an abstract trilevel multi-objective formulation architecture to model all vehicle routing problems with assignment, routing, and speed decision variables and conflicting objective functions. Such an architecture guides the development of subproblems, relaxations, and solution methods. We also propose a way of integrating the various urban transportation services by introducing a constraint on the speed variables that takes into account the traffic volume caused across the different services. Based on the formulation architecture, we introduce a (bilevel) problem where assignment and routing are at the upper level and speed is at the lower level. To address the challenge of dealing with routing problems on urban road networks, we develop an algorithm that alternates between the assignment-routing problem on an auxiliary complete graph and the speed optimization problem on the original non-complete graph. The computational experiments show the effectiveness of the proposed approach in determining approximate Pareto fronts among the conflicting objectives.

math.OC↗

Accuracy and Fairness Trade-offs in Machine Learning: A Stochastic Multi-Objective Approach

In the application of machine learning to real-life decision-making systems, e.g., credit scoring and criminal justice, the prediction outcomes might discriminate against people with sensitive attributes, leading to unfairness. The commonly used strategy in fair machine learning is to include fairness as a constraint or a penalization term in the minimization of the prediction loss, which ultimately limits the information given to decision-makers. In this paper, we introduce a new approach to handle fairness by formulating a stochastic multi-objective optimization problem for which the corresponding Pareto fronts uniquely and comprehensively define the accuracy-fairness trade-offs. We have then applied a stochastic approximation-type method to efficiently obtain well-spread and accurate Pareto fronts, and by doing so we can handle training data arriving in a streaming way.

cs.LG↗

A Stochastic Alternating Balance $k$-Means Algorithm for Fair Clustering

In the application of data clustering to human-centric decision-making systems, such as loan applications and advertisement recommendations, the clustering outcome might discriminate against people across different demographic groups, leading to unfairness. A natural conflict occurs between the cost of clustering (in terms of distance to cluster centers) and the balance representation of all demographic groups across the clusters, leading to a bi-objective optimization problem that is nonconvex and nonsmooth. To determine the complete trade-off between these two competing goals, we design a novel stochastic alternating balance fair $k$-means (SAfairKM) algorithm, which consists of alternating classical mini-batch $k$-means updates and group swap updates. The number of $k$-means updates and the number of swap updates essentially parameterize the weight put on optimizing each objective function. Our numerical experiments show that the proposed SAfairKM algorithm is robust and computationally efficient in constructing well-spread and high-quality Pareto fronts both on synthetic and real datasets.

cs.LG↗