SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Luisa Paoluzzi

Publications and source records attributed to Luisa Paoluzzi.

17 recordsLinked to original sources

Characterising knots by their branched coverings

These are the notes for a mini-course on the problem of determining knots by means of their cyclic branched coverings given at the Workshop on Branched Covers held at IMUS in Seville from November 17 to 21, 2025.

math.GT

On groups with Schottky set boundary

We study relatively hyperbolic group pairs whose boundaries are Schottky sets. We characterize the groups that have boundaries where the Schottky sets have incidence graphs with 1 or 2 components.

math.GT

Cyclic branched covers of alternating knots

For any integer n > 2, the n-fold cyclic branched cover M of an alternating prime knot K in the 3-sphere determines K, meaning that if K is a knot in the 3-sphere that is not equivalent to K then its n-fold cyclic branched cover cannot be homeomorphic to M.

math.GT

Examples of character varieties in characteristic $p$ and ramification

We study $\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{F})$-character varieties of knots over algebraically closed fields $\mathbb{F}$. We give a sufficient condition in terms of the double branched cover of a $2$-bridge knot (or, equivalently, of its Alexander polynomial) on the characteristic of $\mathbb{F}$, an odd prime, for the $\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{F})$-character variety to present ramification phenomena. Finally we provide several explicit computations of character varieties to illustrate the result, exhibiting also other types of ramification.

math.GT

Double branched covers of tunnel number one knots

We provide criteria ensuring that a tunnel number one knot $K$ is not determined by its double branched cover, in the sense that the double branched cover is also the double branched cover of a knot $K'$ not equivalent to $K$.

math.GT

Prime amphicheiral knots with free period 2

We construct prime amphicheiral knots that have free period 2. This settles an open question raised by the second named author, who proved that amphicheiral hyperbolic knots cannot admit free periods and that prime amphicheiral knots cannot admit free periods of order >2.

math.GT

Finite group actions and cyclic branched covers of knots in $\mathbf{S}^3$

We show that a hyperbolic $3$-manifold can be the cyclic branched cover of at most fifteen knots in $\mathbf{S}^3$. This is a consequence of a general result about finite groups of orientation preserving diffeomorphisms acting on $3$-manifolds. A similar, although weaker, result holds for arbitrary irreducible $3$-manifolds: an irreducible $3$-manifold can be the cyclic branched cover of odd prime order of at most six knots in $\mathbf{S}^3$.

math.GT

Boundaries of Kleinian groups

We review the theory of splittings of hyperbolic groups, as determined by the topology of the boundary. We give explicit examples of certain phenomena and then use this to describe limit sets of Kleinian groups up to homeomorphism.

math.GT

A note on covers of fibred hyperbolic manifolds

For each surface $S$ of genus $g>2$ we construct pairs of conjugate pseudo-Anosov maps, $φ_1$ and $φ_2$, and two non-equivalent covers $p_i: \tilde S \longrightarrow S$, $i=1,2$, so that the lift of $φ_1$ to $\tilde S$ with respect to $p_1$ coincides with that of $φ_2$ with respect to $p_2$. The mapping tori of the $φ_i$ and their lift provide examples of pairs of hyperbolic $3$-manifolds so that the first is covered by the second in two different ways.

math.GT

A characterisation of S^3 among homology spheres

We prove that an integral homology 3-sphere is S^3 if and only if it admits four periodic diffeomorphisms of odd prime orders whose space of orbits is S^3. As an application we show that an irreducible integral homology sphere which is not S^3 is the cyclic branched cover of odd prime order of at most four knots in S^3. A result on the structure of finite groups of odd order acting on integral homology spheres is also obtained.

math.GT

A note on the Lawrence-Krammer-Bigelow representation

A very popular problem on braid groups has recently been solved by Bigelow and Krammer, namely, they have found a faithful linear representation for the braid group B_n. In their papers, Bigelow and Krammer suggested that their representation is the monodromy representation of a certain fibration. Our goal in this paper is to understand this monodromy representation using standard tools from the theory of hyperplane arrangements. In particular, we prove that the representation of Bigelow and Krammer is a sub-representation of the monodromy representation which we consider, but that it cannot be the whole representation.

math.GT