arXiv subjects

Luiza O. Ponte

Publications and source records attributed to Luiza O. Ponte.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Foreground removal and 21 cm signal estimates: comparing different blind methods for the BINGO Telescope

The BINGO radiotelescope will observe hydrogen distribution using Intensity Mapping (IM) to analyze the Dark Energy paradigm through Baryon Acoustic Oscillations. The target signal is contaminated by unwanted signals and instrumental noise, making accurate estimations essential for characterizing the 21 cm signal. In this study, we evaluated the performance of three blind foreground-removing algorithms - FastICA, GNILC, and GMCA - on the BINGO pipeline. Each method used different approaches to estimate foreground contributions, and we also investigated how the number of simulations for debiasing affects estimation quality. Our findings indicate that using 50 or 400 simulations yields equivalent results at this stage of analysis. All algorithms produced statistically consistent estimates of the 21 cm signal. We used FastICA for estimating and debiasing the HI spectra from five years of observations, which yielded reliable results, although the first channel was affected by edge effects from the mixing matrix. The overall signal-to-noise ratio was 204, and the chi-squared value was 1.8.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2026

The BINGO project X. Cosmological parameter constraints from HI Intensity Mapping lognormal simulations

Context. Building on the transformative success of optical redshift surveys, the emerging technique of neutral hydrogen (HI) intensity mapping (IM) offers a novel probe of large-scale structure (LSS) growth and the late-time accelerated expansion of the universe. Aims. We present cosmological forecasts for the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from Integrated Neutral Gas Observations (BINGO), a pioneering HI IM experiment, quantifying its potential to constrain the Planck-calibrated $Λ$CDM cosmology and extensions to the $w_0w_a$CDM dark energy model. Methods. For BINGO's Phase~1 configuration, we simulate the HI IM signal using a lognormal model and incorporate three dominant systematics: foreground residuals, thermal noise, and beam resolution effects. Using Bayesian inference, we derive joint constraints on six cosmological parameters ($Ω_b h^2$, $Ω_c h^2$, $100θ_s$, $n_s$, $\ln 10^{10} A_s$, and $τ_r$) alongside 60 HI parameters ($b_{\rm HI}^i$, $Ω_{\rm HI}^i b_{\rm HI}^i$) across 30 frequency channels. Results. Our results demonstrate that combining BINGO with the Planck 2018 CMB dataset tightens the confidence regions of cosmological parameters to $\sim$40\% the size of those from Planck alone, significantly improving the precision of parameter estimation. Furthermore, BINGO constrains the redshift evolution of HI density and delivers competitive measurements of the dark energy equation of state parameters ($w_0$, $w_a$). Conclusions. These results demonstrate BINGO's potential to extract significant cosmological information from the HI distribution and provide constraints competitive with current and future cosmological surveys.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2025

Constraints on interacting dark energy revisited: implications for the Hubble tension

We revisit a class of coupled dark energy models where dark energy interacts with dark matter via phenomenological energy exchange terms. We include the perturbation of the Hubble rate in the interaction term, which was absent in previous works. We also consider more recent data sets such as cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies from \text{Planck} 2018, type I-a supernovae (SNIa) measurements from Pantheon+ and data from baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), and redshift space distortions (RSD). One of the models presents a strong incompatibility when different cosmological datasets are used. We analyze the influence of the SH0ES Cepheid host distances on the results and, although for one model the discrepancy of $H_0$ is reduced to $3.2σ$ when compared to the value obtained by the \textit{Planck} collaboration and $3.6σ$ when compared to the SH0ES team, joint analysis is incompatible. Including BAO with RSD shows incompatibility with SH0ES for all models considered here. We perform a model comparison and although there is a preference for interacting dark energy over $Λ$CDM for all the models for joint analysis CMB+BAO+RSD+SNIa, most of the 2D contours do not overlap. We conclude that the models of interactions in the dark sector considered in this paper are not flexible enough to fit all the cosmological data including values of $H_0$ from SH0ES in a statistically acceptable way. Therefore, the addition of one extra degree of freedom (i.e. the coupling between dark matter and dark matter) does not help enough to alleviate the already existing tension in the vanilla $Λ$CDM, suggesting that the models would need to be modified to include further flexibility of predictions to help elucidate this issue.

astro-ph.CO↗