arXiv subjects

Lukas Rosenberger Schmid

Publications and source records attributed to Lukas Rosenberger Schmid.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

What do VLM-Based Vision-Language Navigation Models Rely on: Interpreting and Steering Policy Behavior

Modern Vision-Language Navigation (VLN) models rely mostly on pre-trained large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to predict navigation actions. While this fusion of language instructions and visual observations allows multimodal reasoning, it obscures how information is routed across modalities or what mechanisms drive navigation decisions. Thus, it remains unclear whether VLN models ground their predictions in relevant semantic cues or can track task progress. In this work, we study the interpretability and steerability of VLN models. We use intervention-based metrics that measure how visual observations, instructions, and visual memory causally influence navigation decisions. Our results show that these navigation policies are sensitive to all input modalities and do not depend on a single one. We further show that these agents encode navigation progress and retain semantic structure from their VLM backbones, enabling concept-level steering through internal activations. Finally, we extract activation vectors for abstract behaviors to transfer them zero-shot to out-of-distribution real-world scenarios, improving performance without additional fine-tuning.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

Probabilistic Scene Graphs: Hierarchical Representation and Real-time System

3D scene graphs provide semantically rich and hierarchical representations for robot perception. However, existing systems do not maintain uncertainty as an explicit belief or propagate it through the operations that construct and refine the graph. We introduce Probabilistic Scene Graph (PSG), a generalization of the conventional scene graph that represents a posterior over possible graphs, factorized into a discrete graph structure of entities, relations, and semantic attributes, and continuous states that ground them spatially, with uncertainty maintained over both components. Geometry is carried directly by the nodes rather than selected from a separately constructed metric map, so a metric map, where needed, follows from the graph rather than preceding it. We instantiate PSG's probabilistic spatial grounding with hierarchical graphs of Gaussians (HGG): each object primitive is represented by a full-covariance Gaussian under a Normal-Inverse-Wishart belief, and the same parametrization applied recursively within a node yields a geometry graph that resolves its surface at finer resolution. We then build a mapping pipeline that preserves these beliefs throughout graph construction and refinement: a purely graph-based coarse-to-fine alignment registers observations by comparing node beliefs, while a nested Expectation-Maximization and factor-graph optimization jointly refines poses, object parameters, and internal geometry. Across six datasets spanning indoor RGB-D, outdoor LiDAR, and cross-modality deployment, HGG operates at sensor rate with near-constant memory and achieves state-of-the-art object accuracy and zero-shot graph alignment.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

3D Scene Graphs: Open Challenges and Future Directions

3D Scene Graphs (3DSGs) have emerged as a powerful representation for spatial AI by combining geometric grounding with semantic and relational abstractions of the environment. Their expressiveness has made them relevant to a broad range of problems in robotics and computer vision, including manipulation, navigation, task planning, scene understanding, and many others. However, the field remains fragmented: different communities adopt distinct formulations, construction pipelines, and evaluation protocols, making it difficult to compare methods, identify common assumptions, and assess remaining challenges for robust real-world deployment. This survey provides a unified and critical review of 3DSGs, with particular emphasis on open challenges and future directions. We first formalize 3DSGs under a common definition and analyze the principal modeling choices that characterize existing formulations, including node and edge attributes, hierarchical structure, dynamic scene representations, and affordance-aware extensions. We then review how 3DSGs are built from raw sensory observations, discussing the most common terminologies, conventions, and techniques. Finally, we examine downstream applications and evaluation strategies, from intrinsic graph quality to task-level performance. To support the community, we also provide a dedicated website that organizes and extends the surveyed content, accessible at https://3dscenegraphs.com/.

cs.RO↗