Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Luke A. Prendergast

Publications and source records attributed to Luke A. Prendergast.

24 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

When large n is not enough---Distribution-free Interval Estimators for Ratios of Quantiles

Ratios of sample percentiles or of quantiles based on a single sample are often published for skewed income data to illustrate aspects of income inequality, but distribution-free confidence intervals for such ratios are to our knowledge not in the literature. Here we derive and compare two large-sample methods for obtaining such intervals. They both require good distribution-free estimates of the quantile density at the quantiles of interest, and such estimates have recently become available. Simulation studies for various sample sizes are carried out for Pareto, lognormal and exponential distributions, as well as fitted generalized lambda distributions, to determine the coverage probabilities and widths of the intervals. Robustness of the estimators to contamination or a positive proportion of zero incomes is examined via influence functions. The motivating example is Australian household income data where ratios of quantiles measure inequality, but of course these results apply equally to data from other countries.

stat.ME↗

Exploiting the Quantile Optimality Ratio to Obtain Better Confidence Intervals for Quantiles

A standard approach to confidence intervals for quantiles requires good estimates of the quantile density. The optimal bandwidth for kernel estimation of the quantile density depends on an underlying location-scale family only through the quantile optimality ratio (QOR), which is the starting point for our results. While the QOR is not distribution-free, it turns out that what is optimal for one family often works quite well for families having similar shape. This allows one to rely on a single representative QOR if one has a rough idea of the distributional shape. Another option that we explore assumes the data can be modeled by the highly flexible generalized lambda distribution (GLD), already studied by others, and we show that using the QOR for the estimated GLD can lead to more than competitive intervals. Confidence intervals for the difference between quantiles from independent populations are also considered, with an application to heart rate data.

stat.ME↗

Meta-analysis of ratios of sample variances

When conducting a meta-analysis of standardized mean differences (SMDs), it is common to assume equal variances in the two arms of each study. This leads to Cohen's $d$ estimates for which interpretation is simple. However, this simplicity should not be used as a justification for the assumption of equal variances in situations where evidence may suggest that it is incorrect. Until now, researchers have either used an $F$-test for each individual study as a justification for the equality of variances or perhaps even conveniently ignored such tools altogether. In this paper we propose using a meta-analysis of F-test statistics to estimate the ratio of variances prior to the combination of SMD's. This procedure allows some studies to be included that might otherwise be omitted by individual fixed level tests for unequal variances, sometimes occur even when the assumption of equal variances holds. The estimated ratio of variances, as well as associated confidence intervals, can be used as guidance as to whether the assumption of equal variances is violated. The estimators considered include variance stabilization transformations (VST) of the $F$-test statistics as well as MLE estimators. The VST approaches enable the use of QQ-plots to visually inspect for violations of equal variances while the MLE estimator easily allows for the introduction of a random effect. When there is evidence of unequal variances, this work provides a means to formally justify the use of less common methods such as log ratio of means when studies are measured on a different scale.

stat.ME↗

Simple response and predictor transformations to adjust for symmetric dependency in dimension reduction for visualization

In the regression setting, dimension reduction allows for complicated regression structures to be detected via visualization in a low-dimension framework. However, some popular dimension reduction methodologies fail to achieve this aim when faced with a problem often referred to as symmetric dependency. In this paper we show how vastly superior results can be achieved when carrying out response and predictor transformations for methods such as least squares and Sliced Inverse Regression. These transformations are simple to implement and utilize estimates from other dimension reduction methods that are not faced with the symmetric dependency problem. We highlight the effectiveness of our approach via simulation and an example. Furthermore, we show that ordinary least squares can effectively detect multiple dimension reduction directions. Methods robust to extreme response values are also considered.

stat.ME↗

A note on sensitivity of principal component subspaces and the efficient detection of influential observations in high dimensions

In this paper we introduce an influence measure based on second order expansion of the RV and GCD measures for the comparison between unperturbed and perturbed eigenvectors of a symmetric matrix estimator. Example estimators are considered to highlight how this measure compliments recent influence analysis. Importantly, we also show how a sample based version of this measure can be used to accurately and efficiently detect influential observations in practice.

math.ST↗

Sensitivity of principal Hessian direction analysis

We provide sensitivity comparisons for two competing versions of the dimension reduction method principal Hessian directions (pHd). These comparisons consider the effects of small perturbations on the estimation of the dimension reduction subspace via the influence function. We show that the two versions of pHd can behave completely differently in the presence of certain observational types. Our results also provide evidence that outliers in the traditional sense may or may not be highly influential in practice. Since influential observations may lurk within otherwise typical data, we consider the influence function in the empirical setting for the efficient detection of influential observations in practice.

stat.ME↗