SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

M. Alirezaei

Publications and source records attributed to M. Alirezaei.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Model-based vs Data-driven Estimation of Vehicle Sideslip Angle and Benefits of Tyre Force Measurements

This paper provides a comprehensive comparison of model-based and data-driven approaches and analyses the benefits of using measured tyre forces for vehicle sideslip angle estimation. The model-based approaches are based on an extended Kalman filter and an unscented Kalman filter, in which the measured tyre forces are utilised in the observation model. An adaptive covariance matrix is introduced to minimise the tyre model mismatch during evasive manoeuvres. For data-driven approaches, feed forward and recurrent neural networks are evaluated. Both approaches use the standard inertial measurement unit and the tyre force measurements as inputs. Using the large-scale experimental dataset of 216 manoeuvres, we demonstrate a significant improvement in accuracy using data-driven vs. model-based approaches. Tyre force measurements improve the performance of both model-based and data-driven approaches, especially in the non-linear regime of tyres.

eess.SY

A Two-Stage Bayesian Optimisation for Automatic Tuning of an Unscented Kalman Filter for Vehicle Sideslip Angle Estimation

This paper presents a novel methodology to auto-tune an Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF). It involves using a Two-Stage Bayesian Optimisation (TSBO), based on a t-Student Process to optimise the process noise parameters of a UKF for vehicle sideslip angle estimation. Our method minimises performance metrics, given by the average sum of the states' and measurement' estimation error for various vehicle manoeuvres covering a wide range of vehicle behaviour. The predefined cost function is minimised through a TSBO which aims to find a location in the feasible region that maximises the probability of improving the current best solution. Results on an experimental dataset show the capability to tune the UKF in 79.9% less time than using a genetic algorithm (GA) and the overall capacity to improve the estimation performance in an experimental test dataset of 9.9% to the current state-of-the-art GA.

eess.SY