M. Tsaqif Wismadi | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Comparing Analytical Approaches for Bike Station Expansion: A Location-Allocation Study in Trondheim, Norway

The strategic placement of bike-sharing infrastructure shapes urban accessibility and mobility outcomes. However, station-allocation approaches vary in their assumptions and decision logic. This study examines how alternative modelling paradigms prioritise urban space when applied to the same planning problem in Trondheim, Norway. We developed a unified analytical framework to compare three location-allocation approaches: weighted linear combination (WLC), maximal covering location problem (MCLP), and a data-driven suitability score based on exogenous spatial features (SSE). Each model designs a 68-station bike-sharing network from scratch using the same 24 spatial features and hierarchical weighting scheme. The resulting configurations are compared with the existing network, and consensus-based synthesis identifies 12 priority locations for expansion. The findings reveal systematic differences in spatial prioritisation across modelling approaches. WLC achieves the strongest coverage of population and transit demand, MCLP produces the widest spatial distribution prioritising geographic reach, and SSE balances demand intensity with accessibility. All model-derived configurations diverge from the existing network, highlighting the influence of historical and institutional factors on real-world deployment. Consensus synthesis identifies 12 expansion sites characterised by multimodal integration potential, underserved residential clusters, and high latent demand. This analysis demonstrates that methodological choices fundamentally shape spatial decision-support outcomes. By systematically evaluating classical optimisation and data-driven approaches under controlled conditions, the study provides evidence-based recommendations for bike-sharing network expansion and clarifies the strengths and limitations of alternative analytical frameworks for location-allocation planning.

physics.soc-ph↗

arXiv2026

Similarity-Based Bike Station Expansion via Hybrid Denoising Autoencoders

Urban bike-sharing systems require strategic station expansion to meet growing demand. Traditional allocation approaches rely on explicit demand modelling that may not capture the urban characteristics distinguishing successful stations. This study addresses the need to exploit patterns from existing stations to inform expansion decisions, particularly in data-constrained environments. We present a data-driven framework leveraging existing stations deemed desirable by operational metrics. A hybrid denoising autoencoder (HDAE) learns compressed latent representations from multi-source grid-level features (socio-demographic, built environment, and transport network), with a supervised classification head regularising the embedding space structure. Expansion candidates are selected via greedy allocation with spatial constraints based on latent-space similarity to existing stations. Evaluation on Trondheim's bike-sharing network demonstrates that HDAE embeddings yield more spatially coherent clusters and allocation patterns than raw features. Sensitivity analyses across similarity methods and distance metrics confirm robustness. A consensus-based procedure across multiple parametrisations distils 32 high-confidence extension zones where all parametrisations agree. The results demonstrate how representation learning captures complex patterns that raw features miss, enabling evidence-based expansion planning without explicit demand modelling. The consensus procedure strengthens recommendations by requiring agreement across parametrisations, while framework configurability allows planners to incorporate operational knowledge. The methodology generalises to any location-allocation problem where existing desirable instances inform the selection of new candidates.

cs.LG↗