arXiv subjects

MIT Hardness Group

Publications and source records attributed to MIT Hardness Group.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Tetris is Hard with Just One Piece Type

We analyze the computational complexity of Tetris clearing (determining whether the player can clear an initial board using a given sequence of pieces) and survival (determining whether the player can avoid losing before placing all the given pieces in an initial board) when restricted to a single polyomino piece type. We prove, for any tetromino piece type $P$ except for O, the NP-hardness of Tetris clearing and survival under the standard Super Rotation System (SRS), even when the input sequence consists of only a specified number of $P$ pieces. These surprising results disprove a 23-year-old conjecture on the computational complexity of Tetris with only I pieces (although our result is only for a specific rotation system). As a corollary, we prove the NP-hardness of Tetris clearing when the sequence of pieces has to be able to be generated from a $7k$-bag randomizer for any positive integer $k\geq 1$. On the positive side, we give polynomial-time algorithms for Tetris clearing and survival when the input sequence consists of only dominoes, assuming a particular rotation model, solving a version of a 9-year-old open problem. Along the way, we give polynomial-time algorithms for Tetris clearing and survival with $1\times k$ pieces (for any fixed $k$), provided the top $k-1$ rows are initially empty, showing that our I NP-hardness result needs to have filled cells in the top three rows.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2026

Planar Graph Orientation Frameworks, Applied to KPlumber and Polyomino Tiling

Given a graph, when can we orient the edges to satisfy local constraints at the vertices, where each vertex specifies which local orientations of its incident edges are allowed? This family of graph orientation problems is a special kind of SAT problem, where each variable (edge orientation) appears in exactly two clauses (vertex constraints) -- once positively and once negatively. We analyze the complexity of many natural vertex types (patterns of allowed vertex neighborhoods), most notably all sets of symmetric vertex types which depend on only the number of incoming edges. In many scenarios, including Planar and Non-Planar Symmetric Graph Orientation with constants, we give a full dichotomy characterizing P vs. NP-complete problem classes. We apply our results to obtain new polynomial-time algorithms, resolving a 20-year-old open problem about KPlumber; to simplify existing NP-hardness proofs for tiling with trominoes; and to prove new NP-completeness results for tiling with tetrominoes.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2025

Pushing Blocks without Fixed Walls via Checkable Gizmos: Push-1 is PSPACE-Complete

We prove PSPACE-completeness of Push-1: given a rectangular grid of 1 x 1 cells, each possibly occupied by a movable block, can a robot move from one specified location to another, given the ability to push up to one block at a time? In particular, we remove the need for fixed (immovable) walls from a 2022 result. This fundamental model of block pushing, introduced in 1999, abstracts the mechanics of many video games. It was shown NP-hard in 2000, but its final complexity remained open for 25 years. Our result uses a new framework for checkable gadgets/gizmos, extending a prior framework for checkable gadgets to handle reconfiguration problems, at the cost of requiring a stronger auxiliary gadget. We also introduce a new connection between the motion-planning-through-gadgets framework (with an agent) and the Graph Orientation Reconfiguration Problem (with no agent), including Nondeterministic Constraint Logic.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

Complexity of 2D Snake Cube Puzzles

Given a chain of $HW$ cubes where each cube is marked "turn $90^\circ$" or "go straight", when can it fold into a $1 \times H \times W$ rectangular box? We prove several variants of this (still) open problem NP-hard: (1) allowing some cubes to be wildcard (can turn or go straight); (2) allowing a larger box with empty spaces (simplifying a proof from CCCG 2022); (3) growing the box (and the number of cubes) to $2 \times H \times W$ (improving a prior 3D result from height $8$ to $2$); (4) with hexagonal prisms rather than cubes, each specified as going straight, turning $60^\circ$, or turning $120^\circ$; and (5) allowing the cubes to be encoded implicitly to compress exponentially large repetitions.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

You Can't Solve These Super Mario Bros. Levels: Undecidable Mario Games

We prove RE-completeness (and thus undecidability) of several 2D games in the Super Mario Bros. platform video game series: the New Super Mario Bros. series (original, Wii, U, and 2), and both Super Mario Maker games in all five game styles (Super Mario Bros. 1 and 3, Super Mario World, New Super Mario Bros. U, and Super Mario 3D World). These results hold even when we restrict to constant-size levels and screens, but they do require generalizing to allow arbitrarily many enemies at each location and onscreen, as well as allowing for exponentially large (or no) timer. Our New Super Mario Bros. constructions fit within one standard screen size. In our Super Mario Maker reductions, we work within the standard screen size and use the property that the game engine remembers offscreen objects that are global because they are supported by "global ground". To prove these Mario results, we build a new theory of counter gadgets in the motion-planning-through-gadgets framework, and provide a suite of simple gadgets for which reachability is RE-complete.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

ASP-Completeness of Hamiltonicity in Grid Graphs, with Applications to Loop Puzzles

We prove that Hamiltonicity in maximum-degree-3 grid graphs (directed or undirected) is ASP-complete, i.e., it has a parsimonious reduction from every NP search problem (including a polynomial-time bijection between solutions). As a consequence, given k Hamiltonian cycles, it is NP-complete to find another; and counting Hamiltonian cycles is #P-complete. If we require the grid graph's vertices to form a full $m \times n$ rectangle, then we show that Hamiltonicity remains ASP-complete if the edges are directed or if we allow removing some edges (whereas including all undirected edges is known to be easy). These results enable us to develop a stronger "T-metacell" framework for proving ASP-completeness of rectangular puzzles, which requires building just a single gadget representing a degree-3 grid-graph vertex. We apply this general theory to prove ASP-completeness of 38 pencil-and-paper puzzles where the goal is to draw a loop subject to given constraints: Slalom, Onsen-meguri, Mejilink, Detour, Tapa-Like Loop, Kouchoku, Icelom; Masyu, Yajilin, Nagareru, Castle Wall, Moon or Sun, Country Road, Geradeweg, Maxi Loop, Mid-loop, Balance Loop, Simple Loop, Haisu, Reflect Link, Linesweeper; Vertex/Touch Slitherlink, Dotchi-Loop, Ovotovata, Building Walk, Rail Pool, Disorderly Loop, Ant Mill, Koburin, Mukkonn Enn, Rassi Silai, (Crossing) Ichimaga, Tapa, Canal View, Aqre, and Paintarea. The last 14 of these puzzles were not even known to be NP-hard. Along the way, we prove ASP-completeness of some simple forms of Tree-Residue Vertex-Breaking (TRVB), including planar multigraphs with degree-6 breakable vertices, or with degree-4 breakable and degree-1 unbreakable vertices.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

Complexity of Planar Graph Orientation Consistency, Promise-Inference, and Uniqueness, with Applications to Minesweeper Variants

We study three problems related to the computational complexity of the popular game Minesweeper. The first is consistency: given a set of clues, is there any arrangement of mines that satisfies it? This problem has been known to be NP-complete since 2000, but our framework proves it as a side effect. The second is inference: given a set of clues, is there any cell that the player can prove is safe? The coNP-completeness of this problem has been in the literature since 2011, but we discovered a flaw that we believe is present in all published results, and we provide a fixed proof. Finally, the third is solvability: given the full state of a Minesweeper game, can the player win the game by safely clicking all non-mine cells? This problem has not yet been studied, and we prove that it is coNP-complete.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

PSPACE-Hard 2D Super Mario Games: Thirteen Doors

We prove PSPACE-hardness for fifteen games in the Super Mario Bros. 2D platforming video game series. Previously, only the original Super Mario Bros. was known to be PSPACE-hard (FUN 2016), though several of the games we study were known to be NP-hard (FUN 2014). Our reductions build door gadgets with open, close, and traverse traversals, in each case using mechanics unique to the game. While some of our door constructions are similar to those from FUN 2016, those for Super Mario Bros. 2, Super Mario Land 2, Super Mario World 2, and the New Super Mario Bros. series are quite different; notably, the Super Mario Bros. 2 door is extremely difficult. Doors remain elusive for just two 2D Mario games (Super Mario Land and Super Mario Run); we prove that these games are at least NP-hard.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

Tetris with Few Piece Types

We prove NP-hardness and #P-hardness of Tetris clearing (clearing an initial board using a given sequence of pieces) with the Super Rotation System (SRS), even when the pieces are limited to any two of the seven Tetris piece types. This result is the first advance on a question posed twenty years ago: which piece sets are easy vs. hard? All previous Tetris NP-hardness proofs used five of the seven piece types. We also prove ASP-completeness of Tetris clearing, using three piece types, as well as versions of 3-Partition and Numerical 3-Dimensional Matching where all input integers are distinct. Finally, we prove NP-hardness of Tetris survival and clearing under the "hard drops only" and "20G" modes, using two piece types, improving on a previous "hard drops only" result that used five piece types.

cs.CC↗