arXiv subjects

Maciej Rapacz

Publications and source records attributed to Maciej Rapacz.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Targum -- A Multilingual New Testament Translation Corpus

Many European languages possess rich biblical translation histories, yet existing corpora - in prioritizing linguistic breadth - often fail to capture this depth. To address this gap, we introduce a multilingual corpus of 651 New Testament translations, of which 334 are unique, spanning five languages with 2.4-5.0x more translations per language than any prior corpus: English (194 unique versions from 390 total), French (41 from 78), Italian (17 from 33), Polish (29 from 48), and Spanish (53 from 102). Aggregated from 12 online biblical libraries and one preexisting corpus, each translation is annotated with metadata that maps the text to a standardized identifier for the work, its specific edition, and its year of revision. This canonicalization allows researchers to define "uniqueness" for their own needs: they can perform micro-level analyses on translation families, such as the KJV lineage, or conduct macro-level studies by deduplicating closely related texts. By providing the first multilingual resource with sufficient depth per language for flexible, multilevel analysis, the corpus fills a gap in the quantitative study of translation history.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Is Textual Similarity Invariant under Machine Translation? Evidence Based on the Political Manifesto Corpus

We investigate the extent to which cosine similarity between paragraph embeddings is invariant under machine translation, using the Manifesto Corpus of over 2,800 political party platforms in 28 languages translated to English via the EU eTranslation service. Rather than measuring translation-induced semantic shift directly we measure the stability of pairwise similarity relationships across embedding models, and use inter-model disagreement on original-language text as a calibrated invariance threshold. This yields a per-language non-inferiority test for four hypotheses about how translation interacts with embedding choice, with verdicts that distinguish languages where translation demonstrably preserves semantic structure from those where it demonstrably degrades it and from those where the available evidence does not resolve the question. The framework is corpus- and pipeline-agnostic and extends naturally to downstream tasks. Applied to our data, it identifies ten languages with translation invariance and four with detectable distortion.

cs.CL↗