SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Mahan Ghafari

Publications and source records attributed to Mahan Ghafari.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Epistatic strength, modularity, and locus heterogeneity shape the number of local optima in fitness landscapes

Fitness landscapes provide a quantitative framework for understanding how natural selection shapes evolutionary trajectories. A central feature of these landscapes is their number of local optima, which determines whether fitness-increasing evolution can proceed towards a global optimum or become trapped on suboptimal peaks. Although multiple peaks are known to require reciprocal sign epistasis, the quantitative relationship between epistasis and number of peaks remains incompletely understood. Here, we show that for a broad class of unstructured fitness landscapes, i.e. isotropic Gaussian random fields, the expected number of local optima is determined by a single local measure of epistasis: the correlation of fitness effects. This provides a baseline prediction for the number of peaks in typical unstructured landscapes and links peak density directly to the amount of reciprocal sign epistasis. This baseline changes when epistatic interactions are structured. We show that clustering interactions within blocks of loci slightly increases the number of local optima. In contrast, strong heterogeneity between loci, where only a small subset of loci participate in epistatic interactions, causes the number of peaks to collapse. These results show that the number of local optima is governed not only by the overall strength of epistasis, but also by how epistatic interactions are distributed across the genotype space. Our framework therefore reconciles the central role of reciprocal sign epistasis with the observation that landscapes with similar amounts of epistasis can differ substantially in ruggedness, and provides a guide to the range of peak numbers expected in typical landscapes.

q-bio.PE

Simple sign epistasis and evolutionary detours in fitness landscapes

In epistatic fitness landscapes, the fitness effect of a mutation depends on the genetic background and may even switch between deleterious and beneficial depending on the presence of another mutation. Epistatic interactions may cause both mutations to change the sign of each other's fitness effects (reciprocal sign epistasis) or only one mutation to do so (simple sign epistasis). Both these forms of epistasis influence evolutionary trajectories. While reciprocal sign epistasis has been associated with multi-peaked landscapes and their ruggedness, the role and relative frequency of simple sign epistasis in fitness landscapes have not been systematically investigated. Here, we prove that the presence of simple sign epistasis is associated with evolutionary detours, i.e., indirect, longer fitness-increasing paths to fitness peaks that include back-mutations. We also show that in experimentally resolved, weakly epistatic landscapes, simple sign epistasis occurs much more frequently than reciprocal sign epistasis. This result is consistent with the theoretical predictions we derive for most landscape models, with the exception of the block model and of landscapes dominated by pairwise allelic incompatibilities, such as RNA stability landscapes. Our results suggest that detours represent a general feature of evolutionary trajectories in weakly epistatic landscapes.

q-bio.PE

Luria-Delbruck, revisited: The classic experiment does not rule out Lamarckian evolution

We re-examined data from the classic Luria-Delbruck fluctuation experiment, which is often credited with establishing a Darwinian basis for evolution. We argue that, for the Lamarckian model of evolution to be ruled out by the experiment, the experiment must favor pure Darwinian evolution over both the Lamarckian model and a model that allows both Darwinian and Lamarckian mechanisms. Analysis of the combined model was not performed in the original 1943 paper. The Luria-Delbruck paper also did not consider the possibility of neither model fitting the experiment. Using Bayesian model selection, we find that the Luria-Delbruck experiment, indeed, favors the Darwinian evolution over purely Lamarckian. However, our analysis does not rule out the combined model, and hence cannot rule out Lamarckian contributions to the evolutionary dynamics.

q-bio.PE