Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Mahbub A. H. M. Latif

Publications and source records attributed to Mahbub A. H. M. Latif.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Identification and Estimation of Causal Estimands with Missing Not at Random Data

Missing not at random (MNAR) data pose significant challenges for causal inference, particularly when both confounders and the outcome are partially observed. Without additional assumptions beyond those required for causal inference, causal estimands are generally not identifiable under MNAR mechanisms. This paper first develops identification results for the causal estimand, the average treatment effect, under several plausible MNAR mechanisms using completeness conditions, and proposes an estimation approach based on the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm. We further extend this identification and estimation framework to mediation analysis, enabling the estimation of natural direct and indirect effects under MNAR mechanisms. Through extensive simulation studies, we compare the proposed method with two widely used approaches for handling missing data, complete-case analysis and multiple imputation. The results show that the proposed method yields substantially lower bias under the considered MNAR mechanisms. Finally, we apply the proposed approach to NHANES data to estimate the causal effect of education on depression, with health condition as the mediator.

stat.ME↗

A Unified Three-Stage Weighting Framework for Causal Inference and Mediation Analysis under Case-Control Sampling

Case-control studies are widely used in epidemiology and biomedical research because they provide substantial efficiency gains when outcomes are rare or prospective follow-up is impractical. However, retrospective outcome-dependent sampling distorts the population outcome distribution, creating fundamental challenges for causal inference. We propose a unified three-stage weighting (3S-weighting) framework for causal inference and causal mediation analysis from case--control studies. The proposed approach first estimates the unknown population outcome prevalence using density-ratio learning and label-shift correction combined with externally available covariate information. Next, prevalence-based design weights are used to reconstruct the target population distribution from the retrospective sample. Finally, stabilized causal and mediation weights are applied within a marginal structural modeling framework to estimate total and pathway-specific causal effects, including the pure direct effect, pure indirect effect, and interaction effect. Simulation studies demonstrate that conventional analyses that ignore retrospective sampling can produce substantial bias in both total and mediation effect estimates, whereas the proposed approach consistently recovers the target population causal parameters across a range of sampling scenarios. An application of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey further illustrates the practical implementation and utility of the proposed framework.

stat.ME↗

Sensitivity Analysis of Inverse Probability Weighting Estimators of Causal Effects in Observational Studies with Multivalued Treatments

One of the fundamental challenges in drawing causal inferences from observational studies is that the assumption of no unmeasured confounding is not testable from observed data. Therefore, assessing sensitivity to this assumption's violation is important to obtain valid causal conclusions in observational studies. Although several sensitivity analysis frameworks are available in the casual inference literature, very few of them are applicable to observational studies with multivalued treatments. To address this issue, we propose a sensitivity analysis framework for performing sensitivity analysis in multivalued treatment settings. Within this framework, a general class of additive causal estimands has been proposed. We demonstrate that the estimation of the causal estimands under the proposed sensitivity model can be performed very efficiently. Simulation results show that the proposed framework performs well in terms of bias of the point estimates and coverage of the confidence intervals when there is sufficient overlap in the covariate distributions. We illustrate the application of our proposed method by conducting an observational study that estimates the causal effect of fish consumption on blood mercury levels.

stat.ME↗

A Risk-Ratio-Based Marginal Sensitivity Model for Causal Effects in Observational Studies

In observational studies, the identification of causal estimands depends on the no unmeasured confounding (NUC) assumption. As this assumption is not testable from observed data, sensitivity analysis plays an important role in observational studies to investigate the impact of unmeasured confounding on the causal conclusions. In this paper, we proposed a risk-ratio-based sensitivity analysis framework by introducing a modified marginal sensitivity model for observational studies with binary treatments. We further extended the proposed framework to the multivalued treatment setting.We then showed how the point estimate intervals and the corresponding percentile bootstrap confidence intervals can be constructed efficiently under the proposed framework. Simulation results suggested that the proposed framework of sensitivity analysis performs well in the presence of adequate overlap among the treatment groups. Lastly, we demonstrated our proposed sensitivity analysis framework by estimating the causal effect of maternal education on female fertility in Bangladesh.

stat.ME↗

A prediction criterion for working correlation structure selection in GEE

Generalized estimating equations (GEE) is one of the most commonly used methods for marginal regression analysis of longitudinal data, especially with discrete outcomes. The GEE method models the association among the responses of a subject through a working correlation matrix and correct specification of the working correlation structure ensures efficient estimation of the regression parameters. This study proposes a predicted residual sum of squares (PRESS) statistic as a working correlation selection criterion in GEE. An extensive simulation study is designed to assess the performance of the proposed GEE PRESS criterion and to compare its performance with well-known existing criteria in the literature. The results show that the GEE PRESS criterion has better performance than the weighted error sum of squares SC criterion in all cases and is comparable with that of other existing criteria when the true working correlation structure is AR(1) or exchangeable. Lastly, the working correlation selection criteria are illustrated with the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study.

stat.ME↗