SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Mahmood Menon Khan

Publications and source records attributed to Mahmood Menon Khan.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Hybrid Federated and Split Learning for Privacy Preserving Clinical Prediction and Treatment Optimization

Collaborative clinical decision support is often constrained by governance and privacy rules that prevent pooling patient-level records across institutions. We present a hybrid privacy-preserving framework that combines Federated Learning (FL) and Split Learning (SL) to support decision-oriented healthcare modeling without raw-data sharing. The approach keeps feature-extraction trunks on clients while hosting prediction heads on a coordinating server, enabling shared representation learning and exposing an explicit collaboration boundary where privacy controls can be applied. Rather than assuming distributed training is inherently private, we audit leakage empirically using membership inference on cut-layer representations and study lightweight defenses based on activation clipping and additive Gaussian noise. We evaluate across three public clinical datasets under non-IID client partitions using a unified pipeline and assess performance jointly along four deployment-relevant axes: factual predictive utility, uplift-based ranking under capacity constraints, audited privacy leakage, and communication overhead. Results show that hybrid FL-SL variants achieve competitive predictive performance and decision-facing prioritization behavior relative to standalone FL or SL, while providing a tunable privacy-utility trade-off that can reduce audited leakage without requiring raw-data sharing. Overall, the work positions hybrid FL-SL as a practical design space for privacy-preserving healthcare decision support where utility, leakage risk, and deployment cost must be balanced explicitly.

cs.LG

Ethical and Explainable AI in Reusable MLOps Pipelines

This paper introduces a unified machine learning operations (MLOps) framework that brings ethical artificial intelligence principles into practical use by enforcing fairness, explainability, and governance throughout the machine learning lifecycle. The proposed method reduces bias by lowering the demographic parity difference (DPD) from 0.31 to 0.04 without model retuning, and cross-dataset validation achieves an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 on the Statlog Heart dataset. The framework maintains fairness metrics within operational limits across all deployments. Model deployment is blocked if the DPD exceeds 0.05 or if equalized odds (EO) exceeds 0.05 on the validation set. After deployment, retraining is automatically triggered if the 30-day Kolmogorov-Smirnov drift statistic exceeds 0.20. In production, the system consistently achieved DPD <= 0.05 and EO <= 0.03, while the KS statistic remained <= 0.20. Decision-curve analysis indicates a positive net benefit in the 10 to 20 percent operating range, showing that the mitigated model preserves predictive utility while satisfying fairness constraints. These results demonstrate that automated fairness gates and explainability artefacts can be successfully deployed in production without disrupting operational flow, providing organizations with a practical and credible approach to implementing ethical, transparent, and trustworthy AI across diverse datasets and operational settings.

cs.CY