arXiv subjects

Malvika Raj Joshi

Publications and source records attributed to Malvika Raj Joshi.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

QAC0 Can Prepare Every Logarithmic-Qubit State

$\mathsf{QAC}^0$ is the class of constant-depth $\mathrm{poly}(n)$-ancilla circuits obtained by extending $\mathsf{QNC}^0$, the class of local circuits, to include nonlocal interactions via arbitrary width Toffoli gates. It is believed to be weaker than its counterpart, $\mathsf{QNC}^0_f$, obtained by including arbitrary-width FANOUT gates instead ($\mathsf{QAC}^0 \subseteq \mathsf{QNC}^0_f$ [Moo99]). In this note, we show that every $O(\log n)$-qubit state can be exactly and cleanly prepared by a $\mathrm{poly}(n)$-ancilla $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ circuit. Previous known $\mathrm{poly}(n)$-ancilla circuits for arbitrary such states are only known via additional access to either FANOUT or QRAM (indexing) gates [Ros21b, GGJ26b], neither of which are known to be in $\mathsf{QAC}^0$. Equivalently, prior constructions of arbitrary $n$-qubit states in $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ require doubly exponential size and we obtain an exponential factor improvement.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

Constant-Depth Unitary Preparation of Dicke States

Dicke states serve as a critical resource in quantum metrology, communication, and computation. However, unitary preparation of Dicke states is limited to logarithmic depth in standard circuit models and existing constant-depth protocols require measurement and feed-forward. In this work, we present the first unitary, constant-depth protocols for exact Dicke state preparation. We overcome the logarithmic-depth barrier by moving beyond the standard circuit model and leveraging global interactions (native to architectures such as neutral atoms and trapped ions). Specifically, utilizing unbounded CZ gates (i.e. within the QAC$^0$ circuit class), we offer circuits for exact computation of constant-weight Dicke states, using polynomial ancillae, and approximation of weight-1 Dicke states (i.e. $W$ states), using only constant ancillae. Granted additional access to the quantum FAN-OUT operation (i.e. upgrading to the QAC$_f^0$ circuit class), we also achieve exact and clean preparation of arbitrary-weight Dicke states, with polynomial ancillae. These protocols distinguish the constant-depth capabilities of quantum architectures based on connectivity and offer a novel path toward resolving a long-standing quantum complexity conjecture.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

Parity $\notin$ QAC0 $\iff$ QAC0 is Fourier-Concentrated

A major open problem in understanding shallow quantum circuits (QAC$^0$) is whether they can compute Parity. We show that this question is solely about the Fourier spectrum of QAC$^0$: any QAC$^0$ circuit with non-negligible high-level Fourier mass suffices to exactly compute PARITY in QAC$^0$. Thus, proving a quantum analog of the seminal LMN theorem for AC$^0$ is necessary to bound the quantum circuit complexity of PARITY. In the other direction, LMN does not fully capture the limitations of AC$^0$. For example, despite MAJORITY having $99\%$ of its weight on low-degree Fourier coefficients, no AC$^0$ circuit can non-trivially correlate with it. In contrast, we provide a QAC$^0$ circuit that achieves $(1-o(1))$ correlation with MAJORITY, establishing the first average-case decision separation between AC$^0$ and QAC$^0$. This suggests a uniquely quantum phenomenon: unlike in the classical setting, Fourier concentration may largely characterize the power of QAC$^0$. PARITY is also known to be equivalent in QAC$^0$ to inherently quantum tasks such as preparing GHZ states to high fidelity. We extend this equivalence to a broad class of state-synthesis tasks. We demonstrate that existing metrics such as trace distance, fidelity, and mutual information are insufficient to capture these states and introduce a new measure, felinity. We prove that preparing any state with non-negligible felinity, or derived states such as poly(n)-weight Dicke states, implies PARITY $\in$ QAC$^0$.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

Polylogarithmic-Weight Dicke States in QAC$^0$ and Arbitrary Symmetric States in QAC$^0_f$

An $n$-qubit Dicke state of weight $k$, is the uniform superposition over all $n$-bit strings of Hamming weight $k$. Dicke states are central to quantum algorithms exhibiting speedups, such as Decoded Quantum Interferometry (Jordan et al., \emph{Nature}, 2025). In the NISQ era, quantum hardware is constrained by both depth and locality, motivating the question of which global operations suffice to prepare such states. QAC$^0$, the quantum analogue of AC$^0$, minimally extends local $O(1)$-depth quantum circuits by allowing arbitrary-width Toffoli (reversible AND) gates. We show that Dicke states of $\mathrm{polylog}(n)$ weight can be prepared in QAC$^0$. This gives the first QAC$^0$ construction of any super-constant-weight $n$-qubit Dicke state, since previous constructions relied on the much more powerful FANOUT$_n$ gate. In general, we show that any weight-$k$ Dicke state can be constructed using FANOUT$_{\min(k,n-k)}$ gates. Combined with recent hardness results, this yields a tight characterization: for $k \leq n/2$, a $n$-qubit weight-$k$ Dicke state can be prepared in QAC$^0$ if and only if FANOUT$_k$ $\in$ QAC$^0$. We develop a limited-fanout state-synthesis toolkit for QAC$^0$ that yields further constant-depth, poly$(n)$-ancilla constructions: 1. Every $n$-qubit symmetric state supported on Hamming weight $\leq k$ can be prepared using FANOUT$_k$ gates. 2. Every $O(\log n)$-qubit state can be prepared using quantum random-access memory (QRAM$_n$), which refers to a coherent indexing gate. QRAM$_n$ is a potentially weaker resource than FANOUT$_n$ and can be implemented in QAC$^0_f$.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

Shor's algorithm requires Fanout

Shor's algorithm is a canonical quantum supremacy target whose core operation relies on the Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT). In this note, we resolve an open question of Fang, Fenner, Green, Homer and Zhang from 2006 by showing that approximating QFT in constant depth, for any $n$-qubit modulus, necessarily requires the $n$-qubit Fanout operation. Formally, let $\mathsf{QFT}_q$ be the gate acting on $n = \lceil \log q \rceil$ qubits that computes the QFT under modulus $q$. It is known that any $n$-qubit $\mathsf{QFT}_q$ can be implemented in constant depth using $\mathsf{FANOUT}_n$, i.e. $\mathsf{QFT}_q \in \mathsf{QAC}^0_f$. We prove the converse by using a $\mathsf{QFT}_q$ gate to construct a state of "non-negligible felinity". Consequently, $\mathsf{QFT}_q \in \mathsf{QAC}^0 \iff \mathsf{FANOUT}_n \in \mathsf{QAC^0}$. In the case of $q = 2^n$, such as in Shor's, we approximate $\mathsf{FANOUT}_n$ using a single $\mathsf{QFT}_{2^n}$ gate and $O(1)$ two-qubit local gates, thus tying the feasibility of realizing Shor's algorithm with NISQ circuits to that of Fanout.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

Improved Lower Bounds for QAC0

In this work, we prove the strongest known lower bounds for QAC$^0$, allowing polynomially many gates and ancillae. Our main results show that: (1) Depth-3 QAC$^0$ circuits cannot compute PARITY, and require $Ω(\exp(\sqrt{n}))$ gates to compute MAJORITY. (2) Depth-2 circuits cannot approximate high-influence Boolean functions (e.g., PARITY) with non-negligible advantage, regardless of size. We develop new classical simulation techniques for QAC$^0$ to obtain our depth-3 bounds. In these results, we relax the output requirement of the quantum circuit to a single bit, making our depth $2$ approximation bound stronger than the previous best bound of Rosenthal (2021). This also enables us to draw natural comparisons with classical AC$^0$ circuits, which can compute PARITY exactly in depth $2$ (exp size). Our techniques further suggest that, for boolean total functions, constant-depth quantum circuits do not necessarily provide more power than their classical counterparts. Our third result shows that depth $2$ QAC$^0$ circuits, regardless of size, cannot exactly synthesize an $n$-target nekomata state (a state whose synthesis is directly related to the computation of PARITY). This complements the depth $2$ exponential size upper bound of Rosenthal (2021) for approximating nekomatas (which is used as a sub-circuit in the only known constant depth PARITY upper bound). Finally, we argue that approximating PARITY in QAC0, with significantly better than 1/poly(n) advantage on average, is just as hard as computing it exactly. Thus, extending our techniques to higher depths would also rule out approximate circuits for PARITY and related problems

quant-ph↗