Does Central Planning Fail Locally? Evaluating EV Charging Flexibility Optimization Across Grid Levels
Electric vehicles (EVs) are a key enabler of global decarbonization, and their charging flexibility is crucial for integrating high shares of renewable energy into future power systems. Research on EV charging flexibility in future power systems has largely focused on either the transmission or the distribution level, with limited integration between the two. However, these two scales cannot be separated: EV charging optimized at the national transmission level for system-wide planning is ultimately activated in local distribution grids, where it may cause voltage and loading issues. This study bridges that gap by evaluating EV charging flexibility across both grid levels, using two different control approaches. First, a top-down approach disaggregates the optimal charging demand obtained from a centralized planner at the transmission grid down to the distribution grid, explicitly accounting for grid constraints and individual driving requirements. Second, a bottom-up approach optimizes EV charging locally under distribution-grid constraints using electricity price signals from the centralized planning model. Controlled charging from the top-down and bottom-up approaches is then compared with uncontrolled charging. Results show that the top-down approach produces EV charging schedules that are compatible with individual driving behavior and reduce grid violations compared to uncontrolled charging. The bottom-up approach identifies an optimal profile similar to the centrally optimized profile, showing that electricity price signals are a suitable coordination mechanism. These findings suggest that centrally optimized EV charging remains effective when implemented at the distribution level, in systems with high DER penetration.