arXiv subjects

Marc Denecker

Publications and source records attributed to Marc Denecker.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Transforming Constraint Programs to Input for Local Search

Applying local search algorithms to combinatorial optimization problems is not an easy feat. Typically, human intervention is required to compile the constraints to input data for some metaheuristic algorithm. In this paper, we establish a link between symmetry properties of constraint optimization problems and local search neighborhoods, and we use this link to automatically generate neighborhoods from a constraint specification in the context of the IDP system. We evaluate the obtained neighborhoods for six classical optimization problems. The resulting observations support the viability of this technique.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

A Sequent Calculus for General Inductive Definitions

Inductive definitions are an important form of knowledge. The logic FO(ID) is an extension of classical first-order logic FO with general non-monotone inductive definitions. Most existing proof systems for inductive definitions impose syntactic constraints on their definitions, thereby excluding many useful and natural definitions. We extend an existing sequent calculus LKID by Brotherston and Simpson, founded on the principle of mathematical induction, to a sequent calculus SCFO(ID) for FO(ID). The main challenge in this extension is the accommodation of non-monotone inductive definitions. To overcome this challenge, we draw inspiration from the stable semantics, which is a commonly used semantics in logic programming that is closely related to the well-founded semantics behind FO(ID). We corroborate SCFO(ID) by establishing several proof-theoretical properties and through demonstration on various examples. In conclusion, SCFO(ID) is a theoretically substantiated sequent calculus for FO(ID), enabling formal proofs of theorems involving general inductive definitions.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Approximation Fixpoint Theory with Refined Approximation Spaces

Approximation Fixpoint Theory (AFT) is a powerful theory covering various semantics of non-monotonic reasoning formalisms in knowledge representation such as Logic Programming and Answer Set Programming. Many semantics of such non-monotonic formalisms can be characterized as suitable fixpoints of a non-monotonic operator on a suitable lattice. Instead of working on the original lattice, AFT operates on intervals in such lattice to approximate or construct the fixpoints of interest. While AFT has been applied successfully across a broad range of non-monotonic reasoning formalisms, it is confronted by its limitations in other, relatively simple, examples. In this paper, we overcome those limitations by extending consistent AFT to deal with approximations that are more refined than intervals. Therefore, we introduce a more general notion of approximation spaces, showcase the improved expressiveness and investigate relations between different approximation spaces.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Order-Sorted Intensional Logic: Expressing Subtyping Polymorphism with Typing Assertions and Quantification over Concepts

Subtyping, also known as subtype polymorphism, is a concept extensively studied in programming language theory, delineating the substitutability relation among datatypes. This property ensures that programs designed for supertype objects remain compatible with their subtypes. In this paper, we explore the capability of order-sorted logic for utilizing these ideas in the context of Knowledge Representation. We recognize two fundamental limitations: First, the inability of this logic to address the concept rather than the value of non-logical symbols, and second, the lack of language constructs for constraining the type of terms. Consequently, we propose guarded order-sorted intensional logic, where guards are language constructs for annotating typing information and intensional logic provides support for quantification over concepts.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2024

A Category-Theoretic Perspective on Higher-Order Approximation Fixpoint Theory

Approximation Fixpoint Theory (AFT) is an algebraic framework designed to study the semantics of non-monotonic logics. Despite its success, AFT is not readily applicable to higher-order definitions. To solve such an issue, we devise a formal mathematical framework employing concepts drawn from Category Theory. In particular, we make use of the notion of Cartesian closed category to inductively construct higher-order approximation spaces while preserving the structures necessary for the correct application of AFT. We show that this novel theoretical approach extends standard AFT to a higher-order environment, and generalizes the AFT setting of arXiv:1804.08335 . Under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).

cs.LO↗

arXiv2023

An epistemic logic for modeling decisions in the context of incomplete knowledge

Substantial efforts have been made in developing various Decision Modeling formalisms, both from industry and academia. A challenging problem is that of expressing decision knowledge in the context of incomplete knowledge. In such contexts, decisions depend on what is known or not known. We argue that none of the existing formalisms for modeling decisions are capable of correctly capturing the epistemic nature of such decisions, inevitably causing issues in situations of uncertainty. This paper presents a new language for modeling decisions with incomplete knowledge. It combines three principles: stratification, autoepistemic logic, and definitions. A knowledge base in this language is a hierarchy of epistemic theories, where each component theory may epistemically reason on the knowledge in lower theories, and decisions are made using definitions with epistemic conditions.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2023

Using Symmetries to Lift Satisfiability Checking

We analyze how symmetries can be used to compress structures (also known as interpretations) onto a smaller domain without loss of information. This analysis suggests the possibility to solve satisfiability problems in the compressed domain for better performance. Thus, we propose a 2-step novel method: (i) the sentence to be satisfied is automatically translated into an equisatisfiable sentence over a ``lifted'' vocabulary that allows domain compression; (ii) satisfiability of the lifted sentence is checked by growing the (initially unknown) compressed domain until a satisfying structure is found. The key issue is to ensure that this satisfying structure can always be expanded into an uncompressed structure that satisfies the original sentence to be satisfied. We present an adequate translation for sentences in typed first-order logic extended with aggregates. Our experimental evaluation shows large speedups for generative configuration problems. The method also has applications in the verification of software operating on complex data structures. Our results justify further research in automatic translation of sentences for symmetry reduction.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2023

Distributed Autoepistemic Logic: Semantics, Complexity, and Applications to Access Control

In this paper we define and study a multi-agent extension of autoepistemic logic (AEL) called distributed autoepistemic logic (dAEL). We define the semantics of dAEL using approximation fixpoint theory, an abstract algebraic framework that unifies different knowledge representation formalisms by describing their semantics as fixpoints of semantic operators. We define 2- and 3-valued semantic operators for dAEL. Using these operators, approximation fixpoint theory allows us to define a class of semantics for dAEL, each based on different intuitions that are well-studied in the context of AEL. We define a mapping from dAEL to AEL and identify the conditions under which the mapping preserves semantics, and furthermore argue that when it does not, the dAEL semantics is more desirable than the AEL-induced semantics since dAEL manages to contain inconsistencies. The development of dAEL has been motivated by an application in the domain of access control. We explain how dAEL can be fruitfully applied to this domain and discuss how well-suited the different semantics are for the application in access control.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2023

Interactive Model Expansion in an Observable Environment

Many practical problems can be understood as the search for a state of affairs that extends a fixed partial state of affairs, the \emph{environment}, while satisfying certain conditions that are formally specified. Such problems are found in, e.g., engineering, law or economics. We study this class of problems in a context where some of the relevant information about the environment is not known by the user at the start of the search. During the search, the user may consider tentative solutions that make implicit hypotheses about these unknowns. To ensure that the solution is appropriate, these hypotheses must be verified by observing the environment. Furthermore, we assume that, in addition to knowledge of what constitutes a solution, knowledge of general laws of the environment is also present. We formally define partial solutions with enough verified facts to guarantee the existence of complete and appropriate solutions. Additionally, we propose an interactive system to assist the user in their search by determining 1) which hypotheses implicit in a tentative solution must be verified in the environment, and 2) which observations can bring useful information for the search. We present an efficient method to over-approximate the set of relevant information, and evaluate our implementation.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2023

The Logic of Logic Programming

Our position is that logic programming is not programming in the Horn clause sublogic of classical logic, but programming in a logic of (inductive) definitions. Thus, the similarity between prototypical Prolog programs (e.g., member, append, ...) and how inductive definitions are expressed in mathematical text, is not coincidental but essential. We argue here that this provides a natural solution to the main lingering semantic questions of Logic Programming and its extensions.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2022

On Nested Justification Systems (full version)

Justification theory is a general framework for the definition of semantics of rule-based languages that has a high explanatory potential. Nested justification systems, first introduced by Denecker et al. (2015), allow for the composition of justification systems. This notion of nesting thus enables the modular definition of semantics of rule-based languages, and increases the representational capacities of justification theory. As we show in this paper, the original semantics for nested justification systems lead to the loss of information relevant for explanations. In view of this problem, we provide an alternative characterization of semantics of nested justification systems and show that this characterization is equivalent to the original semantics. Furthermore, we show how nested justification systems allow representing fixpoint definitions (Hou and Denecker 2009).

cs.AI↗

arXiv2022

Quantification and Aggregation over Concepts of the Ontology

We argue that in some KR applications, we want to quantify over sets of concepts formally represented by symbols in the vocabulary. We show that this quantification should be distinguished from second-order quantification and meta-programming quantification. We also investigate the relationship with concepts in intensional logic. We present an extension of first-order logic to support such abstractions, and show that it allows writing expressions of knowledge that are elaboration tolerant. To avoid nonsensical sentences in this formalism, we refine the concept of well-formed sentences, and propose a method to verify well-formedness with a complexity that is linear with the number of tokens in the formula. We have extended FO(.), a Knowledge Representation language, and IDP-Z3, a reasoning engine for FO(.), accordingly. We show that this extension was essential in accurately modelling various problem domains in an elaboration-tolerant way, i.e., without reification.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2022

Interactive configurator with FO(.) and IDP-Z3

Industry abounds with interactive configuration problems, i.e., constraint solving problems interactively solved by persons with the assistance of a computer. The computer program, called a configurator, needs to perform a variety of reasoning tasks with the (often incomplete) information that the user provides. Imperative programming approaches make such systems difficult to implement and maintain. Knowledge-based configurators have been proposed to help engineers solve such problems, but many challenges remain. We present IDP-Z3, a new reasoning engine for the FO(.) KR language, and we report on its use for building configurators automatically from a knowledge base.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

Analyzing Semantics of Aggregate Answer Set Programming Using Approximation Fixpoint Theory

Aggregates provide a concise way to express complex knowledge. The problem of selecting an appropriate formalisation of aggregates for answer set programming (ASP) remains unsettled. This paper revisits it from the viewpoint of Approximation Fixpoint Theory (AFT). We introduce an AFT formalisation equivalent with the Gelfond-Lifschitz reduct for basic ASP programs and we extend it to handle aggregates. We analyse how existing approaches relate to our framework. We hope this work sheds some new light on the issue of a proper formalisation of aggregates. This paper is under consideration for acceptance in TPLP.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2021

Justifications and a Reconstruction of Parity Game Solving Algorithms

Parity games are infinite two-player games played on directed graphs. Parity game solvers are used in the domain of formal verification. This paper defines parametrized parity games and introduces an operation, Justify, that determines a winning strategy for a single node. By carefully ordering Justify steps, we reconstruct three algorithms well known from the literature.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2020

Exploiting Game Theory for Analysing Justifications

Justification theory is a unifying semantic framework. While it has its roots in non-monotonic logics, it can be applied to various areas in computer science, especially in explainable reasoning; its most central concept is a justification: an explanation why a property holds (or does not hold) in a model. In this paper, we continue the study of justification theory by means of three major contributions. The first is studying the relation between justification theory and game theory. We show that justification frameworks can be seen as a special type of games. The established connection provides the theoretical foundations for our next two contributions. The second contribution is studying under which condition two different dialects of justification theory (graphs as explanations vs trees as explanations) coincide. The third contribution is establishing a precise criterion of when a semantics induced by justification theory yields consistent results. In the past proving that such semantics were consistent took cumbersome and elaborate proofs. We show that these criteria are indeed satisfied for all common semantics of logic programming. This paper is under consideration for acceptance in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP).

cs.AI↗

arXiv2019

The informal semantics of Answer Set Programming: A Tarskian perspective

In Knowledge Representation, it is crucial that knowledge engineers have a good understanding of the formal expressions that they write. What formal expressions state intuitively about the domain of discourse is studied in the theory of the informal semantics of a logic. In this paper we study the informal semantics of Answer Set Programming. The roots of answer set programming lie in the language of Extended Logic Programming, which was introduced initially as an epistemic logic for default and autoepistemic reasoning. In 1999, the seminal papers on answer set programming proposed to use this logic for a different purpose, namely, to model and solve search problems. Currently, the language is used primarily in this new role. However, the original epistemic intuitions lose their explanatory relevance in this new context. How answer set programs are connected to the specifications of problems they model is more easily explained in a classical Tarskian semantics, in which models correspond to possible worlds, rather than to belief states of an epistemic agent. In this paper, we develop a new theory of the informal semantics of answer set programming, which is formulated in the Tarskian setting and based on Frege's compositionality principle. It differs substantially from the earlier epistemic theory of informal semantics, providing a different view on the meaning of the connectives in answer set programming and on its relation to other logics, in particular classical logic.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2018

Transpiling Programmable Computable Functions to Answer Set Programs

Programming Computable Functions (PCF) is a simplified programming language which provides the theoretical basis of modern functional programming languages. Answer set programming (ASP) is a programming paradigm focused on solving search problems. In this paper we provide a translation from PCF to ASP. Using this translation it becomes possible to specify search problems using PCF.

cs.PL↗