arXiv subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Marcin Pawlowski.
We show that the monogamy of entanglement is a sufficient phenomenon in every physical theory, if the quantum key distribution is to be safe on the grounds of such theory. To do so we present the QKD protocol that is safe in any physical theory under the assumption of the monogamous entanglement only. The necessity of this condition is also discussed.
We ''save'' Bell's Theorem by showing a flaw in Christian's argument.
We analyze an example of a photon in superposition of different modes, and ask what is the degree of their entanglement with vacuum. The problem turns out to be ill-posed since we do not know which representation of the algebra of canonical commutation relations (CCR) to choose for field quantization. Once we make a choice, we can solve the question of entanglement unambiguously. So the difficulty is not with mathematics, but with physics of the problem. In order to make the discussion explicit we analyze from this perspective a popular argument based on a photon leaving a beam splitter and interacting with two two-level atoms. We first solve the problem algebraically in Heisenberg picture, without any assumption about the form of representation of CCR. Then we take the $\infty$-representation and show in two ways that in two-mode states the modes are maximally entangled with vacuum, but single-mode states are not entangled. Next we repeat the analysis in terms of the representation of CCR taken from Berezin's book and show that two-mode states do not involve the mode-vacuum entanglement. Finally, we switch to a family of reducible representations of CCR recently investigated in the context of field quantization, and show that the entanglement with vacuum is present even for single-mode states. Still, the degree of entanglement is here difficult to estimate, mainly because there are $N+2$ subsystems, with $N$ unspecified and large.
Standard quantum cryptographic protocols are not secure if one assumes that nonlocal hidden variables exist and can be measured with arbitrary precision. The security can be restored if one of the communicating parties randomly switches between two standard protocols.
The so-called entanglement with vacuum is not a property of the Fock space, but of some rather pathological representations of CCR/CAR algebras. In some other Fock space representations the notion simply does not exist. We have checked all the main Gedanken experiments where the notion of entanglement with vacuum was used, and found that all the calculations could be performed at a representation-independent level. In particular any such experiment can be formulated in a Fock-space representation where the notion of entanglement with vacuum is meaningless. So, for the moment there is no single experiment where the notion is needed, and probably it is simply unphysical.
This paper has been withdrawn. The main technical result will reappear in the new version of quant-ph/0501003.
It is known that statistical predictions of quantum theory do not depend on its interpretation. In particular, an experiment cannot distinguish between the Copenhagen interpretation (involving no hidden variables) and the de Broglie-Bohm interpretation based on nonlocal hidden variables. Quantum cryptographic protocols, such as BB84 or E91, are secure and mutually equivalent as long as one works within the framework of Copenhagen interpretation. But they are inequivalent and insecure if one considers attacks allowed by the de Broglie-Bohm interpretation. The fundametal problem of quantum cryptography is therefore this: Are all the statements about security of quantum protocols based on our belief in one of the two allowed interpretations of quantum mechanics? We show that this is not the case. Ekert-type protocols can be modified in a way that makes them secure even if the de Broglie-Bohm nonlocal hidden variables exist. Bennett-Brassard-type cryptography does not seem to allow for such a correction.