"They don't care about this": A Systematic Study of TEE Build Reproducibility in the Wild
Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) have become a cornerstone of modern cloud computing, providing strong confidentiality and integrity guarantees for both code and data. A critical component of this trust model is remote attestation, which enables external entities to verify the authenticity and integrity of code executing within a TEE through cryptographic measurements. However, the effectiveness of remote attestation fundamentally depends on the verifier's ability to trace the reported measurement back to the original source code - a property that can only be guaranteed through reproducible builds. In this paper, we investigate the reproducibility of TEE builds through a technical analysis of 115 TEE deployments. Our analysis spans popular TEEs such as Intel SGX, Intel TDX, and AMD SEV, and reveals that a striking 91% of those deployments were not reproducible, with 80% failing to provide both source code and a reference build, the two essential prerequisites for reproducibility. To explore the root causes, we contacted the maintainers of 50 SGX projects and managed to recruit 12 developers from industry and academia for interviews. Only one of our participants reported that reproducibility is a priority during development, effectively confirming our technical findings. Beyond technical barriers (e.g., timestamps included in the binary) that can be readily addressed, we identify broader ecosystem-level challenges, such as the lack of control over the build environment in projects involving multiple stakeholders. We argue that achieving reproducibility in TEEs requires a holistic development approach that extends beyond individual developers and calls for stronger commitments - rather than treating TEEs as a "security badge".